Jump to content
Frobby

Serious question: could Means become a TOR starter?

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

He didn't exceed six innings pitched in any start this year.  Last season he pitched seven five times.  He never exceeded seven.

The demands on a TOR guy are not what they once were but I think the occasional eight or even nine inning start is still expected.

The way I look at it, you have TOR starters and aces.  I think what you are describing is an ace.

Means won’t be an ace...he isn’t the elite of the elite.

But he can be a TOR guy depending on a few factors.

I do think it’s fair to question whether he can throw 200 innings.  I think 170-185 innings is more realistic.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think John will settle into more of mid rotation role and hopefully give us a chance every time he takes the bump. Someone like Kyle Hendricks, your #3 starter for years. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

The way I look at it, you have TOR starters and aces.  I think what you are describing is an ace.

Means won’t be an ace...he isn’t the elite of the elite.

But he can be a TOR guy depending on a few factors.

I do think it’s fair to question whether he can throw 200 innings.  I think 170-185 innings is more realistic.

I agree, unless and until he proves otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

TOR is just the best pitcher in your rotation correct? Wasn't he the TOR last year? Not sure who that was this year? Means or Cobb?

I read TOR starter as a top 30 guy in MLB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Bahama O's Fan said:

Okay. I think people use these terms differently. TOR means top of the rotation. I then always used it as the best pitcher in your rotation 

Some of the O's historic "TOR" guys wouldn't be a #3 on a good team.

I don't think anyone really questions that Means could be the best starter on next season's staff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A TOR to me is one of the top 60 pitchers in baseball.  Some teams may have more than two of these while some have none.

An ACE would be the top twenty of those 60 pitchers IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, thezeroes said:

A TOR to me is one of the top 60 pitchers in baseball.  Some teams may have more than two of these while some have none.

An ACE would be the top twenty of those 60 pitchers IMO.

I’m a little stricter.   I want a TOR to be worthy of a top 2 spot in a decent rotation over at least a few years.    Not that he has to perform to no. 2 standards every single year, but most of the time.   When I think of a TOR, John Lackey and AJ Burnett come to mind.    Maybe a little lower down than that is still TOR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, thezeroes said:

A TOR to me is one of the top 60 pitchers in baseball.  Some teams may have more than two of these while some have none.

An ACE would be the top twenty of those 60 pitchers IMO.

Ace is like top 5 to me. You pretty much expect to win every night no matter who you are facing. Bieber, Cole, Verlander, Degrom, Scherzer. Outside of those guys I can't think of any I would call Ace nowadays. Top 20 would be so called Number 1's but not every Number 1 is an Ace, IMO. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/26/2020 at 11:55 PM, wildcard said:

Sure

Exactly.  Sure, John Means could go 17-7 a year for each of the next 14 years.  Or maybe he goes 19-33 the rest of his career.  Yes, he's looked really good at times, not quite so good at others.

I did a query of guys who had 100-400 innings pitched and a FIP between 4.25-4.75 through age 27 in the last 100 years.  Means is kind of in the middle of that.  Some names I recognize: Andrew Miller, Boof Bonser, Joe Saunders, Rodrigo Lopez, Wade LeBlanc, Wei-Yin Chen, Rich Hill, J.A. Happ, Jason Grimsley, Ed Farmer, Mike Bielecki, Garrett Stephenson, Charlie Hough, Al Leiter, Mark Redman, Tim Wakefield, Willis Roberts, Paul Byrd, Jerry Don Gleaton, Tyler Wilson, Gene Harris, Tim Worrell, Jim Konstanty, Dave DeBusschere, Greneral Crowder.

Not too many top-of-the-rotation starters there, but who knows?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/27/2020 at 8:56 AM, Frobby said:

Too soon to know about the first issue.  His minor league track record was very good: 27, 27, 26 and 28 starts in a MiL environment where 28 is basically the max over a 140 game season.    

I take your point about getting deep into games.   I was watching in the 6th, Means still working on a no hitter at the time and Garceau mentioned he was at 93 pitches.    How does your pitch count get that high when you’ve allowed one baserunner and still working in the 6th?   Still, TOR innings per start seems to be a moving target these days.  I count 8 pitchers this year who’ve made 10 starts and thrown 6+ innings per start.   There’s only 18 pitchers in MLB who qualify for the ERA title!  (That does not include innings from yesterday or the upcoming games today, so that number will increase, but still...)
 

9 of 18 outs were K's.  As I watched there were several deeper counts and felt like there was more work than the no hitter suggested.  Still looked good, but no quick innings based on pitch counts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The results for much of last year put him there and he has a bit more velocity along with a solid end in 2020. That said, I'm very hesitant to go there. I would honestly be quite happy if he gives us a solid mid-rotation option for the next several years. That would allow him to be a dependable anchor in the rotation as Akin and Kremer get a full year next year and we start introducing Hall and Grayson to the mix in the next couple seasons (along with Baumann, Lowther, Smith, etc.).

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • The discrepancy is even worse when you think about how our draft picks work, with I think two exceptions, far better than theirs. It’s hard to blame one person, because the problem is over so long, but boy somebody is to blame
    • Now here's the Red Sox:   Dustin Pedroia, 2:24 2004, 51.6 rWAR Mookie Betts, 5:21 2011, 45.2 rWAR Jon Lester, 2:16 2002, 44.6 rWAR Anthony Rizzo, 6:20 2007, 34.3 rWAR Kevin Youkilis, 8:17 2001, 32.4 rWAR Jacoby Ellsbury, 1:23 2005, 31.0 rWAR (FA comp) Josh Reddick, 17:7 2006, 24.7 rWAR Jonathan Papelbon, 4:17 2003, 23.3 rWAR Jackie Bradley Jr., 1:40 2011, 17.8 rWAR (FA comp) Jed Lowrie, 1:45 2005, 17.0 rWAR (FA comp) Clay Buchholz, 1:42 2005, 16.7 rWAR (FA comp) Freddy Sanchez, 11:22 2000, 15.9 rWAR Justin Masterson, 2:27 2006, 10.1 rWAR David Murphy, 1:17 2003, 9.9 rWAR Andrew Benintendi , 1:7 2015, 9.7 rWAR Travis Shaw, 9:21 2011, 9.4 rWAR Kelly Shoppach, 2:4 2001, 8.3 rWAR (FA comp) Alex Wilson, 2:28 2009, 5.1 rWAR Brandon Moss, 8:16 2002, 5.0 rWAR Daniel Bard, 1:28 2006, 5.0 rWAR (FA comp) Manny Delcarmen, 2:22 2000, 3.8 rWAR Christian Vazquez 9:30 2008, 3.6 rWAR Matt Murton; 1:32 2003, 3.3 rWAR (FA comp) Brandon Workman 2:7 2010, 3.1 rWAR   Cla Meredith, 6:24 2004, 2.9 rWAR Hunter Strickland, 18:20 2007, 3.8 rWAR Ryan Pressly, 11:20 2007, 7.0 rWAR Kristopher Negron 7:27 2006, 1.8 rWAR Kason Gabbard, 29:22 2000, 1.8 rWAR J.B. Wendelken, 13:23 2012, 1.4 rWAR Brian Johnson, 1s:31 2012, 1.3 rWAR Tanner Houck, 1:24 2017, 1.3 rWAR Noe Ramirez, 3:21 2011, 1.3 rWAR Mauricio Dubron 26:7 2013, 1.2 rWAR Travis Lakins, 6:6 2015, 1.2 rWAR Ty Buttrey, 4:23 2012, 1.1 rWAR Jeremy Hazelbacher, 27:4 2009, 1.1 rWAR   Total: 37 players, 458.8 rWAR 2000-09: 25 players, 364.8 rWAR 2009-20: 12 players, 94.0 rWAR   They crushed us in the 2000-09 period.    We have a slight edge on them in 2010-20 to date.     
    • Actually he's the perfect guy for the Japanese Leagues. He might hit 80 home runs in Korea!
    • There is no real legit argument that regular at bats aren’t there for Nunez until Diaz is an option up here.
    • Yammering about the rule five is my favorite part of the off-season. I wonder who we might lose? I don’t think anybody’s going to take Sedlock, and if they do, I highly doubt they would keep him. We’ve already discussed pop, but I wonder if there any guys in the system who are on the radars of other teams? Unprotected top 30 guys are of course the first place to look, but they are definitely not the only place to look.
    • Shaw has nothing to do with Nunez. There is no correlation at all. Shaw should be DFA’d at some point, probably soon. He can be outrighted. You’re not supposed to get excited about a move like this. It’s a potential depth move, with a big LH power upside if he can make some larger improvements. Chances are slim he can do that, but why not take a shot?  He’ll be in AAA, unless he makes huge strides. And he does remind me of Chris Davis quite a bit.  I am not sure if Nunez was making what Valaika is due, projected around $1 million, that he would still be an Oriole. I doubt it. Roster space is one thing, roster flexibility is another, but he just would not have gotten the at bats. They need the at bats for Mancini, Mountcastle, Hays, Santander, Stewart, Mullins and Diaz when he comes up. Yes, some injury history in there, sure. But the upside and potential value in that group can only be developed with experience. They need these guys to get their at bats. They are all potential members of the next competitive team the Orioles have. And like 2020, Iglesias, and several others, might get some at bats at DH. Why keep a guy around with no options, whose only tool is his bat, when he’s not going to get at bats? I think that is smart, not cheap. Now if they did that to Mancini, that would be cheap. Without the albatross of the Davis contract, I still think Nunez is out. He needs to be a regular to be productive, he’s not a bench guy. 
    • God bless Caleb Joseph. meanwhile. Zach Davies....grrr...9.7 WAR. Think we coulda’ used that? please don’t share Parra’s Orioles WAR...that just twists the knife.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...