Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
RZNJ

Outfield depth? We need it.

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

Flatly disagree.  

Santander 1.7 rWAR, 37 games 

Hays 0.7 rWAR, 33 games

Stewart 0.6 rWAR, 31 games

Mountcastle 0.5 rWAR, 35 games

Mullins 0.4 rWAR, 48 games 

Every single one of them played significantly over replacement value.  The O’s were 5th in the AL in Wins Above Average for the outfield, at +1.1.   These were small sample sizes, and we could see regression in 2021, but given the ages and experience levels of these players, I’d say the more likely scenario is that as a group we see improvement on a performance that already was pretty good.    

 

 

Wow ...you got me one guy with close to WAR and everybody else less than 1. Less than 1 hardly screams star.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:


i was trying to say 1 of Mountcastle or Mancini likely wind up at first. 

I think Mancini plays first if he's able to play in the field.

I'm not at all certain that Mountcastle would be better served at first. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Wow ...you got me one guy with close to WAR and everybody else less than 1. Less than 1 hardly screams star.

Look at the number of games.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Wow ...you got me one guy with close to WAR and everybody else less than 1. Less than 1 hardly screams star.

Remember WAR is a cumulative stat, if each played a full season those numbers would be higher, so long as they kept hitting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

Wow ...you got me one guy with close to WAR and everybody else less than 1. Less than 1 hardly screams star.

Most of them played less than a quarter of a full season.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Philip said:

Remember WAR is a cumulative stat, if each played a full season those numbers would be higher, so long as they kept hitting

Sure ...but there’s nothing saying that Mullins doesn’t go into a spiral. Hayes stays healthy. Really , Mountcastle is the only OF that I feel comfortable with his growth and progression. Santander did well but he hasn’t started a full season yet either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Most of them played less than a quarter of a full season.  

I don’t think that you can project their 2020 stats X 3 or 4. As I mentioned....let’s see Mullins hit consistently for a full season, let’s see if Hayes can stay off the DL, and I’m willing to give Santander a mulligan based solely on the fact that he really hasn’t been injured prior to this season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t think that you can project their 2020 stats X 3 or 4. As I mentioned....let’s see Mullins hit consistently for a full season, let’s see if Hayes can stay off the DL, and I’m willing to give Santander a mulligan based solely on the fact that he really hasn’t been injured prior to this season.

None of this has anything to do with what you initially said.  You made it seem like their WAR wasn’t a big deal because it’s a low number.  But without the context of games played, that’s just a false statement.

No one is saying they would have all been 3-4 WAR guys but they showed that ability in the sample size of 2020.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

None of this has anything to do with what you initially said.  You made it seem like their WAR wasn’t a big deal because it’s a low number.  But without the context of games played, that’s just a false statement.

No one is saying they would have all been 3-4 WAR guys but they showed that ability in the sample size of 2020.

Plenty of AAAA players have a 1/4 season where they looked like MLB pieces 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t think that you can project their 2020 stats X 3 or 4. As I mentioned....let’s see Mullins hit consistently for a full season, let’s see if Hayes can stay off the DL, and I’m willing to give Santander a mulligan based solely on the fact that he really hasn’t been injured prior to this season.

I made it very clear in my post that it was a small sample size and they could regress.    But the simple fact is, they all performed significantly above replacement level in the relatively short time they played.   And, because of their age and experience level, as a group  I like their chances of improving rather than regressing.   That’s not to say that all of them will improve.   But collectively I think the chances of improvement are better than 50/50.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

Sure ...but there’s nothing saying that Mullins doesn’t go into a spiral. Hayes stays healthy. Really , Mountcastle is the only OF that I feel comfortable with his growth and progression. Santander did well but he hasn’t started a full season yet either.

I kind of agree and WHO saw THAT coming!!!? 😛

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Philip said:

Mountcastle and Mancini are not outfielders, unless standing in the outfield with a glove counts.

You keep saying this about Mountcastle and you keep being wrong.  He was roughly average in LF with very little game experience behind him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NCRaven said:

You keep saying this about Mountcastle and you keep being wrong.  He was roughly average in LF with very little game experience behind him.

You are incorrect. I looked him up just to make sure. He had zero outs above average, zero runs prevented, at FanGraphs, he had minus 1.8 dWAR, negative DRS at every position, including sadly, 1B, which was his worst. He has mildly positive OF UZR/150, but that’s his only above zero stat. 
I know that defense stats take a long time to normalize, but defense has always been the knock on MC, he admits it himself, so it is incorrect to suggest he is a positive defender, though he may hit well enough that it doesn’t matter. I would rather have a real Of and put MC at DH.

Edited by Philip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Philip said:

You are incorrect. I looked him up just to make sure. He had zero outs above average, zero runs prevented, at FanGraphs, he had minus 1.8 WAR, negative DRS at every position, including sadly, 1B, which was his worst. He has mildly positive OF UZR/150, but that’s his only above zero stat. 
I know that defense stats take a long time to normalize, but defense has always been the knock on MC, he admits it himself, so it is incorrect to suggest he is a positive defender, though he may hit well enough that it doesn’t matter. I would rather have a real Of and put MC at DH.

Mountcastle was -1.8 dWar in half of an abbreviated season?  I find that hard to believe.  He would have had to make Jose Canseco look like Willie Mays. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Obviously but it’s based off of what value they get by trading back and not by what’s available IMO. If they can trade #13 for a late one and early #2 (Jacksonville) they will absolutely do it imo! As that’s how they do things.    The rest of my argument is fact until he proves otherwise. It’s funny to me that you so arrogantly scream your wrong and I’m right and then argue both sides of the QB debate. I agree that you have to wait and see, and there is at least a chance all be it small that he drastically improves in accuracy and touch outside. But, I’m not banking on it and based on your previous wait and see position you aren’t enough to throw 100MM plus at him right now. Are the Ravens willing, we shall see but I think their actions speak louder than words as far as it happening now. The next two weeks as mentioned by EDC are gone and we haven’t heard anything else. But, I also know Harbaugh can be stubborn and is probably pushing for it thinking he can run them to the Super Bowl. I think it’s pretty obvious that it can get them to the playoffs but becomes a house of cards once there.
    • This is..interesting   https://www.totalprosports.com/2021/02/24/ravens-matt-judon-demands-apology-or-threatens-to-leak-photos-of-espn-reporter-jamison-hensley-at-a-strip-club-pics/?fbclid=IwAR3m03DbO43OYg9RcptFmAT8rO_S9JyB0_ChhYls4MHZKSVfX97hYaOoklk
    • They will trade down if they view it as the best option.  They will make the pick if that is their best option and they will trade up if they view that as beneficial.  That’s how they do things.   The rest of your post is just about your bias and the same bs argument that I have grown tired of.
    • I would hope you understand the point there.
    • Eddie Murray mid-swing is the lock screen photo on my phone.  And I don’t like IPAs, but that is one fine-looking can of beer above. 
    • Why except me? I know it has to but I’m convinced we’ve seen who Lamar Jackson is outside of some nominal improvement. I don’t think they will ever win a Super Bowl with him at the helm. The gimmick has been figured out and the good team have learned how to minimize it. Vick was the savior when he was drafted in Atlanta until he wasn’t. This point of view is no different than Flacco....After 3 seasons we knew what we had and outside of a hot streak in the playoffs he was who he was until injuries and then fear made him worse. Do you think Jackson can be accurate outside the numbers plus 20 yards? I don’t .... period. I pretty much agree with the bolded part ....but, you don’t need to draft a guy like Pitts if he’s there at #13. As I said, I don’t think they will as I think they would use that pick to end up with 2 or 3 other early picks. There is a possible scenario that I see is that teams don’t offer enough and it forces them to pick. If that happens you take the BPA.    Lamar has been successful throwing to guys like Andrews, Hurst, and Boyle as mismatches. Draft another TE like Friermuth, Long, Jordan on day 2. If they trade Brown Jr, draft Wyatt Davis, Jenkins/Van Lanen etc, and Landon Dickerson /Trey Hill and fix the line for the long term.
    • I won’t agree until they actually do it. I’d bet 100% that if the Ravens trade Brown and received #13 they’d almost certainly trade down. That just what they do! If they received #33 and #45 would they trade into the late 1st, possibly. Do they want to throw more? I don’t care what they say, I care what they do.Lamar says he wants to throw and be viewed as a passer. His actions and instincts say he wants to run. Wasting a high pick or a shit ton of money on a WR is a fools errand.  Honestly Rob, I can’t believe you’re buying it.    Could they pick Rondale Moore, Friermuth or Marshall at #27? I guess they might. But, they’d be better off fixing the line at Center, Guard, and RT with their early picks.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...