Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
RZNJ

Outfield depth? We need it.

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

Flatly disagree.  

Santander 1.7 rWAR, 37 games 

Hays 0.7 rWAR, 33 games

Stewart 0.6 rWAR, 31 games

Mountcastle 0.5 rWAR, 35 games

Mullins 0.4 rWAR, 48 games 

Every single one of them played significantly over replacement value.  The O’s were 5th in the AL in Wins Above Average for the outfield, at +1.1.   These were small sample sizes, and we could see regression in 2021, but given the ages and experience levels of these players, I’d say the more likely scenario is that as a group we see improvement on a performance that already was pretty good.    

 

 

Wow ...you got me one guy with close to WAR and everybody else less than 1. Less than 1 hardly screams star.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:


i was trying to say 1 of Mountcastle or Mancini likely wind up at first. 

I think Mancini plays first if he's able to play in the field.

I'm not at all certain that Mountcastle would be better served at first. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Wow ...you got me one guy with close to WAR and everybody else less than 1. Less than 1 hardly screams star.

Look at the number of games.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Wow ...you got me one guy with close to WAR and everybody else less than 1. Less than 1 hardly screams star.

Remember WAR is a cumulative stat, if each played a full season those numbers would be higher, so long as they kept hitting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

Wow ...you got me one guy with close to WAR and everybody else less than 1. Less than 1 hardly screams star.

Most of them played less than a quarter of a full season.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Philip said:

Remember WAR is a cumulative stat, if each played a full season those numbers would be higher, so long as they kept hitting

Sure ...but there’s nothing saying that Mullins doesn’t go into a spiral. Hayes stays healthy. Really , Mountcastle is the only OF that I feel comfortable with his growth and progression. Santander did well but he hasn’t started a full season yet either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Most of them played less than a quarter of a full season.  

I don’t think that you can project their 2020 stats X 3 or 4. As I mentioned....let’s see Mullins hit consistently for a full season, let’s see if Hayes can stay off the DL, and I’m willing to give Santander a mulligan based solely on the fact that he really hasn’t been injured prior to this season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t think that you can project their 2020 stats X 3 or 4. As I mentioned....let’s see Mullins hit consistently for a full season, let’s see if Hayes can stay off the DL, and I’m willing to give Santander a mulligan based solely on the fact that he really hasn’t been injured prior to this season.

None of this has anything to do with what you initially said.  You made it seem like their WAR wasn’t a big deal because it’s a low number.  But without the context of games played, that’s just a false statement.

No one is saying they would have all been 3-4 WAR guys but they showed that ability in the sample size of 2020.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

None of this has anything to do with what you initially said.  You made it seem like their WAR wasn’t a big deal because it’s a low number.  But without the context of games played, that’s just a false statement.

No one is saying they would have all been 3-4 WAR guys but they showed that ability in the sample size of 2020.

Plenty of AAAA players have a 1/4 season where they looked like MLB pieces 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t think that you can project their 2020 stats X 3 or 4. As I mentioned....let’s see Mullins hit consistently for a full season, let’s see if Hayes can stay off the DL, and I’m willing to give Santander a mulligan based solely on the fact that he really hasn’t been injured prior to this season.

I made it very clear in my post that it was a small sample size and they could regress.    But the simple fact is, they all performed significantly above replacement level in the relatively short time they played.   And, because of their age and experience level, as a group  I like their chances of improving rather than regressing.   That’s not to say that all of them will improve.   But collectively I think the chances of improvement are better than 50/50.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

Sure ...but there’s nothing saying that Mullins doesn’t go into a spiral. Hayes stays healthy. Really , Mountcastle is the only OF that I feel comfortable with his growth and progression. Santander did well but he hasn’t started a full season yet either.

I kind of agree and WHO saw THAT coming!!!? 😛

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Philip said:

Mountcastle and Mancini are not outfielders, unless standing in the outfield with a glove counts.

You keep saying this about Mountcastle and you keep being wrong.  He was roughly average in LF with very little game experience behind him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NCRaven said:

You keep saying this about Mountcastle and you keep being wrong.  He was roughly average in LF with very little game experience behind him.

You are incorrect. I looked him up just to make sure. He had zero outs above average, zero runs prevented, at FanGraphs, he had minus 1.8 dWAR, negative DRS at every position, including sadly, 1B, which was his worst. He has mildly positive OF UZR/150, but that’s his only above zero stat. 
I know that defense stats take a long time to normalize, but defense has always been the knock on MC, he admits it himself, so it is incorrect to suggest he is a positive defender, though he may hit well enough that it doesn’t matter. I would rather have a real Of and put MC at DH.

Edited by Philip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Philip said:

You are incorrect. I looked him up just to make sure. He had zero outs above average, zero runs prevented, at FanGraphs, he had minus 1.8 WAR, negative DRS at every position, including sadly, 1B, which was his worst. He has mildly positive OF UZR/150, but that’s his only above zero stat. 
I know that defense stats take a long time to normalize, but defense has always been the knock on MC, he admits it himself, so it is incorrect to suggest he is a positive defender, though he may hit well enough that it doesn’t matter. I would rather have a real Of and put MC at DH.

Mountcastle was -1.8 dWar in half of an abbreviated season?  I find that hard to believe.  He would have had to make Jose Canseco look like Willie Mays. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • A Google of Oriole MLB player rep didn't give an insta-answer but did get me here. https://www.mlbplayers.com/player-leadership One line from the page -  Every two years, all 30 teams hold elections for their Player Reps and Alternates. No clue if we are mid-term or at the start of a new one, but if new, hmmm.   I have no real guess if in the union Davis is a hero, or if in the clubhouse Davis is a punchline, and the regard for veteranosity runs that deep.   I guess a curmudgeon might say he's likelier than Santander, Means, etc. to still be on the team in two years. Davis/Cobb/Trey/Yolmer the only guys above 4.000 service time I see, and guessing these reps skew old. Rhys Hoskins and Jameson Taillon two younger guys on this old list https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2019/12/mlbpa-player-reps-union.html
    • I think Stewart is more likely to have at least 5 WAR (maybe a 30 percent chance), but McKenna is more likely to reach 10 WAR (maybe a 5 percent chance).    If McKenna hits enough to be a regular he could play a long time and carve out a decent career. I don't think it is very likely, which is why his floor is a lot lower than Stewart's in my view. Stewart's ceiling isn't as high as an average at best defensive (supposedly, although he has looked worse than that at the MLB level) corner outfielder.
    • I know it is completely unfair to judge Stewart's defense off of one play but I can't help it ... I can't unsee the ball bounce off his head.  And I didn't laugh at it, i cringed.  But even when he steps to the plate, that's what I remember.
    • I don't see why you wouldn't sign Alberto to a minor league contract with an invite to Spring Training. Its not like we're overloaded with major league ready infielders...
    • At this point I think you have to look at Stewart as primarily a DH who can play the OF in a pinch.  His speed and range are still better than most fans think, just because they see a tubby guy and assume he must be slow, but his simple coordination on fly balls just isn't going to play on a routine basis out there.  He seems to really struggle with the glove-side while running, which isn't all that uncommon.    
    • I don't know ..... But Trout is a bad comp as he was rewarded with a $426 million dollar contract and has continued to perform. Davis was rewarded with $161 million and other than physically hasn't shown up. Do you really think this is isolated to professional sports? I have worked many jobs in B2B sales and then as a sales manager. I accepted a role with the Home Depot that was mostly incentive based. When I accepted the role the incentive was based on a 10 man team that was performing at or above 100%. The morale was poor and the head count was 5 with an employee that had submitted his 2 week notice. I went to work on a paltry base salary and no chance of receiving any incentive for months! I basically rebuilt the team and got the production to 130% within 6 months. On month 7 after reaching full head count I was laid off as part of a national downsizing. They essentially eliminated 1 manager from every region with seniority being the only factor. My team was divided up and given to the 4 other sales managers who got to reap the rewards of my hard work.   I guess I'm rambling but ....Stuff happens! In Davis' case he signed the contract and checked out. Most people would be fired from their jobs for lack of performance. It would be one thing if it were an Albert Belle or Glenn Davis situation where the player was injured and simply unable to do it. Davis' defiance in this case means he has essentially no pride and he must understand that many fans now view him as a POS.
    • Can Stewart have a 240/350/450 type slash line.  If so, he has value while he’s cheap.   I think his slugging and OBp could get higher but I think his floor is low too.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...