Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
RZNJ

Outfield depth? We need it.

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Mountcastle was -1.8 dWar in half of an abbreviated season?  I find that hard to believe.  He would have had to make Jose Canseco look like Willie Mays. 

I checked at fangraphs. The stat might be different at BBR, But I always use FanGraphs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Mountcastle was -1.8 dWar in half of an abbreviated season?  I find that hard to believe.  He would have had to make Jose Canseco look like Willie Mays. 

I want to stress that was only defensive WAR and not total. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Philip said:

I checked at fangraphs. The stat might be different at BBR, But I always use FanGraphs

You are misinterpreting the meaning of the stat.   dWAR (which is just called “Defense” on Fangraphs) is a combination of the positional value (how difficult is the position to play) and then fielding value (whether the player is above or below average at the positions he played)   Mountcastle had a positional value of -1.8 and a fielding value of +0.1, and with rounding that comes to -1.8.   But that number shows he was basically average at the positions he played, he just happened to play positions that are easy.   By the way, positional value also includes games at DH, which are strongly negative.  

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

Plenty of AAAA players have a 1/4 season where they looked like MLB pieces 

Ok..but again, this has nothing to do with your post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Philip said:

You are incorrect. I looked him up just to make sure. He had zero outs above average, zero runs prevented, at FanGraphs, he had minus 1.8 dWAR, negative DRS at every position, including sadly, 1B, which was his worst. He has mildly positive OF UZR/150, but that’s his only above zero stat. 
I know that defense stats take a long time to normalize, but defense has always been the knock on MC, he admits it himself, so it is incorrect to suggest he is a positive defender, though he may hit well enough that it doesn’t matter. I would rather have a real Of and put MC at DH.

You say NCRaven is incorrect, then you cite stats that show that Mountcastle was average at the positions he played, which is exactly what NCRaven said.  He said average, not above average.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

You are misinterpreting the meaning of the stat.   dWAR (which is just called “Defense” on Fangraphs) is a combination of the positional value (how difficult is the position to play) and then fielding value (whether the player is above or below average at the positions he played)   Mountcastle had a positional value of -1.8 and a fielding value of +0.1, and with rounding that comes to -1.8.   But that number shows he was basically average at the positions he played, he just happened to play positions that are easy.   By the way, positional value also includes games at DH, which are strongly negative.  

This. And to be clear, the defense value cited by Fangraphs is in runs, not wins.  The dWAR on bb-ref is in wins (roughly runs/10), and also includes the positional adjustment.

Compare Mountcastle to Austin Hayes.  Hayes played 180 innings in center, and 94 in RF/LF.  He was a +3 fielder overall, and his positional adjustment based on that mix of innings was -0.2.  So he he was about three runs better than an average MLB fielder.  Mountcastle was about two runs worse.  So in ~35 games the difference in defensive value between Hayes and Mountcastle was roughly five runs, or half a win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Number5 said:

You say NCRaven is incorrect, then you cite stats that show that Mountcastle was average at the positions he played, which is exactly what NCRaven said.  He said average, not above average.

Mountcastle didn’t look lost in the outfield. But, in no way do I think we will ever see anything out there from him that would be anything other than ordinary. That said ...If he can OPS .950+ you can live wot he his OF defensive mediocrity 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Frobby said:

You are misinterpreting the meaning of the stat.   dWAR (which is just called “Defense” on Fangraphs) is a combination of the positional value (how difficult is the position to play) and then fielding value (whether the player is above or below average at the positions he played)   Mountcastle had a positional value of -1.8 and a fielding value of +0.1, and with rounding that comes to -1.8.   But that number shows he was basically average at the positions he played, he just happened to play positions that are easy.   By the way, positional value also includes games at DH, which are strongly negative.  

I appreciate that clarification, but he looked awful. And at baseball savant he’s zero or below zero in everything I checked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally disagree that Mountcastle looked awful out there. Berroa was an awful OFer and he is who we should measure against if we are using the word awful.

Mountcastle looked like a GGer compared to him.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Philip said:

I appreciate that clarification, but he looked awful. And at baseball savant he’s zero or below zero in everything I checked.

Zero is average on Baseball Savant.   

I’m not particularly defending his fielding.   I didn’t watch enough to form a strong opinion one way or the other, and in any event, defensive stats based on 23 games in the outfield have very limited value.    But for whatever value they do have, they don’t support the opinion that Mountcastle shouldn’t carry a glove.   And I don’t think anyone’s opinion should be set in stone based on such a very small sample.   We’ll get a better look next year.   
 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I totally disagree that Mountcastle looked awful out there. Berroa was an awful OFer and he is who we should measure against if we are using the word awful.

Mountcastle looked like a GGer compared to him.

 

The whole idea of “looked awful” is a questionable concept.   If modern metrics have taught us anything, it’s that a guy can look pretty good in the field but actually be below average, or vice versa.   In the OF this has a lot to do with what kind of jump the fielder gets and whether he takes good routes.   Those things are hard to pick up watching on TV and not just focusing on the one player the whole game.  A guy can have OK speed and catch everything he reaches, and yet be below average due to these factors.   Or, a guy can be well above average even if he occasionally drops a ball if these factors play in his favor.   

The other problem with “looks terrible” is that 1-2 plays can skew your opinion of a player, especially if the memorable play (good or bad) occurs before you’ve seen the player a lot.   
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The whole idea of “looked awful” is a questionable concept.   If modern metrics have taught us anything, it’s that a guy can look pretty good in the field but actually be below average, or vice versa.   In the OF this has a lot to do with what kind of jump the fielder gets and whether he takes good routes.   Those things are hard to pick up watching on TV and not just focusing on the one player the whole game.  A guy can have OK speed and catch everything he reaches, and yet be below average due to these factors.   Or, a guy can be well above average even if he occasionally drops a ball if these factors play in his favor.   

The other problem with “looks terrible” is that 1-2 plays can skew your opinion of a player, especially if the memorable play (good or bad) occurs before you’ve seen the player a lot.   
 

Eyes lie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny thing is to my eyes, he didn't look "awful" at all.  He looked like someone learning a new position on the fly.  If he is athletic enough to truly be an average defender in LF, his bat will provide big time value at that position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had to bet on better defensive value going forward, I would choose Mountcastle over Stewart.  I would think that Mountcastle can play an average to slightly below average LF and won't embarass himself.  His best position is probably 1B and his athleticism would be an asset there.  There have been many worse corner OFs for the O's, Delmon Young, Trumbo, and of course Jack Cust come to mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

There have been many worse corner OFs for the O's, Delmon Young, Trumbo, and of course Jack Cust come to mind.

Hopefully “better than those guys” is not the standard we’re trying to meet.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Obviously but it’s based off of what value they get by trading back and not by what’s available IMO. If they can trade #13 for a late one and early #2 (Jacksonville) they will absolutely do it imo! As that’s how they do things.    The rest of my argument is fact until he proves otherwise. It’s funny to me that you so arrogantly scream your wrong and I’m right and then argue both sides of the QB debate. I agree that you have to wait and see, and there is at least a chance all be it small that he drastically improves in accuracy and touch outside. But, I’m not banking on it and based on your previous wait and see position you aren’t enough to throw 100MM plus at him right now. Are the Ravens willing, we shall see but I think their actions speak louder than words as far as it happening now. The next two weeks as mentioned by EDC are gone and we haven’t heard anything else. But, I also know Harbaugh can be stubborn and is probably pushing for it thinking he can run them to the Super Bowl. I think it’s pretty obvious that it can get them to the playoffs but becomes a house of cards once there.
    • This is..interesting   https://www.totalprosports.com/2021/02/24/ravens-matt-judon-demands-apology-or-threatens-to-leak-photos-of-espn-reporter-jamison-hensley-at-a-strip-club-pics/?fbclid=IwAR3m03DbO43OYg9RcptFmAT8rO_S9JyB0_ChhYls4MHZKSVfX97hYaOoklk
    • They will trade down if they view it as the best option.  They will make the pick if that is their best option and they will trade up if they view that as beneficial.  That’s how they do things.   The rest of your post is just about your bias and the same bs argument that I have grown tired of.
    • I would hope you understand the point there.
    • Eddie Murray mid-swing is the lock screen photo on my phone.  And I don’t like IPAs, but that is one fine-looking can of beer above. 
    • Why except me? I know it has to but I’m convinced we’ve seen who Lamar Jackson is outside of some nominal improvement. I don’t think they will ever win a Super Bowl with him at the helm. The gimmick has been figured out and the good team have learned how to minimize it. Vick was the savior when he was drafted in Atlanta until he wasn’t. This point of view is no different than Flacco....After 3 seasons we knew what we had and outside of a hot streak in the playoffs he was who he was until injuries and then fear made him worse. Do you think Jackson can be accurate outside the numbers plus 20 yards? I don’t .... period. I pretty much agree with the bolded part ....but, you don’t need to draft a guy like Pitts if he’s there at #13. As I said, I don’t think they will as I think they would use that pick to end up with 2 or 3 other early picks. There is a possible scenario that I see is that teams don’t offer enough and it forces them to pick. If that happens you take the BPA.    Lamar has been successful throwing to guys like Andrews, Hurst, and Boyle as mismatches. Draft another TE like Friermuth, Long, Jordan on day 2. If they trade Brown Jr, draft Wyatt Davis, Jenkins/Van Lanen etc, and Landon Dickerson /Trey Hill and fix the line for the long term.
    • I won’t agree until they actually do it. I’d bet 100% that if the Ravens trade Brown and received #13 they’d almost certainly trade down. That just what they do! If they received #33 and #45 would they trade into the late 1st, possibly. Do they want to throw more? I don’t care what they say, I care what they do.Lamar says he wants to throw and be viewed as a passer. His actions and instincts say he wants to run. Wasting a high pick or a shit ton of money on a WR is a fools errand.  Honestly Rob, I can’t believe you’re buying it.    Could they pick Rondale Moore, Friermuth or Marshall at #27? I guess they might. But, they’d be better off fixing the line at Center, Guard, and RT with their early picks.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...