Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
RZNJ

Outfield depth? We need it.

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Mountcastle was -1.8 dWar in half of an abbreviated season?  I find that hard to believe.  He would have had to make Jose Canseco look like Willie Mays. 

I checked at fangraphs. The stat might be different at BBR, But I always use FanGraphs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Mountcastle was -1.8 dWar in half of an abbreviated season?  I find that hard to believe.  He would have had to make Jose Canseco look like Willie Mays. 

I want to stress that was only defensive WAR and not total. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Philip said:

I checked at fangraphs. The stat might be different at BBR, But I always use FanGraphs

You are misinterpreting the meaning of the stat.   dWAR (which is just called “Defense” on Fangraphs) is a combination of the positional value (how difficult is the position to play) and then fielding value (whether the player is above or below average at the positions he played)   Mountcastle had a positional value of -1.8 and a fielding value of +0.1, and with rounding that comes to -1.8.   But that number shows he was basically average at the positions he played, he just happened to play positions that are easy.   By the way, positional value also includes games at DH, which are strongly negative.  

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

Plenty of AAAA players have a 1/4 season where they looked like MLB pieces 

Ok..but again, this has nothing to do with your post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Philip said:

You are incorrect. I looked him up just to make sure. He had zero outs above average, zero runs prevented, at FanGraphs, he had minus 1.8 dWAR, negative DRS at every position, including sadly, 1B, which was his worst. He has mildly positive OF UZR/150, but that’s his only above zero stat. 
I know that defense stats take a long time to normalize, but defense has always been the knock on MC, he admits it himself, so it is incorrect to suggest he is a positive defender, though he may hit well enough that it doesn’t matter. I would rather have a real Of and put MC at DH.

You say NCRaven is incorrect, then you cite stats that show that Mountcastle was average at the positions he played, which is exactly what NCRaven said.  He said average, not above average.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

You are misinterpreting the meaning of the stat.   dWAR (which is just called “Defense” on Fangraphs) is a combination of the positional value (how difficult is the position to play) and then fielding value (whether the player is above or below average at the positions he played)   Mountcastle had a positional value of -1.8 and a fielding value of +0.1, and with rounding that comes to -1.8.   But that number shows he was basically average at the positions he played, he just happened to play positions that are easy.   By the way, positional value also includes games at DH, which are strongly negative.  

This. And to be clear, the defense value cited by Fangraphs is in runs, not wins.  The dWAR on bb-ref is in wins (roughly runs/10), and also includes the positional adjustment.

Compare Mountcastle to Austin Hayes.  Hayes played 180 innings in center, and 94 in RF/LF.  He was a +3 fielder overall, and his positional adjustment based on that mix of innings was -0.2.  So he he was about three runs better than an average MLB fielder.  Mountcastle was about two runs worse.  So in ~35 games the difference in defensive value between Hayes and Mountcastle was roughly five runs, or half a win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Number5 said:

You say NCRaven is incorrect, then you cite stats that show that Mountcastle was average at the positions he played, which is exactly what NCRaven said.  He said average, not above average.

Mountcastle didn’t look lost in the outfield. But, in no way do I think we will ever see anything out there from him that would be anything other than ordinary. That said ...If he can OPS .950+ you can live wot he his OF defensive mediocrity 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Frobby said:

You are misinterpreting the meaning of the stat.   dWAR (which is just called “Defense” on Fangraphs) is a combination of the positional value (how difficult is the position to play) and then fielding value (whether the player is above or below average at the positions he played)   Mountcastle had a positional value of -1.8 and a fielding value of +0.1, and with rounding that comes to -1.8.   But that number shows he was basically average at the positions he played, he just happened to play positions that are easy.   By the way, positional value also includes games at DH, which are strongly negative.  

I appreciate that clarification, but he looked awful. And at baseball savant he’s zero or below zero in everything I checked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally disagree that Mountcastle looked awful out there. Berroa was an awful OFer and he is who we should measure against if we are using the word awful.

Mountcastle looked like a GGer compared to him.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Philip said:

I appreciate that clarification, but he looked awful. And at baseball savant he’s zero or below zero in everything I checked.

Zero is average on Baseball Savant.   

I’m not particularly defending his fielding.   I didn’t watch enough to form a strong opinion one way or the other, and in any event, defensive stats based on 23 games in the outfield have very limited value.    But for whatever value they do have, they don’t support the opinion that Mountcastle shouldn’t carry a glove.   And I don’t think anyone’s opinion should be set in stone based on such a very small sample.   We’ll get a better look next year.   
 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I totally disagree that Mountcastle looked awful out there. Berroa was an awful OFer and he is who we should measure against if we are using the word awful.

Mountcastle looked like a GGer compared to him.

 

The whole idea of “looked awful” is a questionable concept.   If modern metrics have taught us anything, it’s that a guy can look pretty good in the field but actually be below average, or vice versa.   In the OF this has a lot to do with what kind of jump the fielder gets and whether he takes good routes.   Those things are hard to pick up watching on TV and not just focusing on the one player the whole game.  A guy can have OK speed and catch everything he reaches, and yet be below average due to these factors.   Or, a guy can be well above average even if he occasionally drops a ball if these factors play in his favor.   

The other problem with “looks terrible” is that 1-2 plays can skew your opinion of a player, especially if the memorable play (good or bad) occurs before you’ve seen the player a lot.   
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The whole idea of “looked awful” is a questionable concept.   If modern metrics have taught us anything, it’s that a guy can look pretty good in the field but actually be below average, or vice versa.   In the OF this has a lot to do with what kind of jump the fielder gets and whether he takes good routes.   Those things are hard to pick up watching on TV and not just focusing on the one player the whole game.  A guy can have OK speed and catch everything he reaches, and yet be below average due to these factors.   Or, a guy can be well above average even if he occasionally drops a ball if these factors play in his favor.   

The other problem with “looks terrible” is that 1-2 plays can skew your opinion of a player, especially if the memorable play (good or bad) occurs before you’ve seen the player a lot.   
 

Eyes lie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny thing is to my eyes, he didn't look "awful" at all.  He looked like someone learning a new position on the fly.  If he is athletic enough to truly be an average defender in LF, his bat will provide big time value at that position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had to bet on better defensive value going forward, I would choose Mountcastle over Stewart.  I would think that Mountcastle can play an average to slightly below average LF and won't embarass himself.  His best position is probably 1B and his athleticism would be an asset there.  There have been many worse corner OFs for the O's, Delmon Young, Trumbo, and of course Jack Cust come to mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

There have been many worse corner OFs for the O's, Delmon Young, Trumbo, and of course Jack Cust come to mind.

Hopefully “better than those guys” is not the standard we’re trying to meet.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I'd rather be the backup on a decent team that has a chance at the postseason as opposed to being the backup on a horrible team that's closer to home. After having so much success in Baltimore I'm sure he can't stand the losing, but he may not have many options at this point. 
    • A Google of Oriole MLB player rep didn't give an insta-answer but did get me here. https://www.mlbplayers.com/player-leadership One line from the page -  Every two years, all 30 teams hold elections for their Player Reps and Alternates. No clue if we are mid-term or at the start of a new one, but if new, hmmm.   I have no real guess if in the union Davis is a hero, or if in the clubhouse Davis is a punchline, and the regard for veteranosity runs that deep.   I guess a curmudgeon might say he's likelier than Santander, Means, etc. to still be on the team in two years. Davis/Cobb/Trey/Yolmer the only guys above 4.000 service time I see, and guessing these reps skew old. Rhys Hoskins and Jameson Taillon two younger guys on this old list https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2019/12/mlbpa-player-reps-union.html
    • I think Stewart is more likely to have at least 5 WAR (maybe a 30 percent chance), but McKenna is more likely to reach 10 WAR (maybe a 5 percent chance).    If McKenna hits enough to be a regular he could play a long time and carve out a decent career. I don't think it is very likely, which is why his floor is a lot lower than Stewart's in my view. Stewart's ceiling isn't as high as an average at best defensive (supposedly, although he has looked worse than that at the MLB level) corner outfielder.
    • I know it is completely unfair to judge Stewart's defense off of one play but I can't help it ... I can't unsee the ball bounce off his head.  And I didn't laugh at it, i cringed.  But even when he steps to the plate, that's what I remember.
    • I don't see why you wouldn't sign Alberto to a minor league contract with an invite to Spring Training. Its not like we're overloaded with major league ready infielders...
    • At this point I think you have to look at Stewart as primarily a DH who can play the OF in a pinch.  His speed and range are still better than most fans think, just because they see a tubby guy and assume he must be slow, but his simple coordination on fly balls just isn't going to play on a routine basis out there.  He seems to really struggle with the glove-side while running, which isn't all that uncommon.    
    • I don't know ..... But Trout is a bad comp as he was rewarded with a $426 million dollar contract and has continued to perform. Davis was rewarded with $161 million and other than physically hasn't shown up. Do you really think this is isolated to professional sports? I have worked many jobs in B2B sales and then as a sales manager. I accepted a role with the Home Depot that was mostly incentive based. When I accepted the role the incentive was based on a 10 man team that was performing at or above 100%. The morale was poor and the head count was 5 with an employee that had submitted his 2 week notice. I went to work on a paltry base salary and no chance of receiving any incentive for months! I basically rebuilt the team and got the production to 130% within 6 months. On month 7 after reaching full head count I was laid off as part of a national downsizing. They essentially eliminated 1 manager from every region with seniority being the only factor. My team was divided up and given to the 4 other sales managers who got to reap the rewards of my hard work.   I guess I'm rambling but ....Stuff happens! In Davis' case he signed the contract and checked out. Most people would be fired from their jobs for lack of performance. It would be one thing if it were an Albert Belle or Glenn Davis situation where the player was injured and simply unable to do it. Davis' defiance in this case means he has essentially no pride and he must understand that many fans now view him as a POS.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...