Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Can_of_corn

N.Y. Appeals Court Upholds 100M MASN Award

Recommended Posts

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2020/10/22/nationals-masn-award/

Quote

A New York appeals court ruled Thursday in favor of the Nationals in a dispute with Mid-Atlantic Sports Network, upholding a $100 million award for the team.

An attorney for MASN, which is owned partially by the Nationals and Baltimore Orioles but controlled by the Orioles, said the network would appeal the decision to New York’s appellate court.

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So does this mean anything real?  Does it change anything? 

I've given up trying to fathom what the concrete meaning of all of these rulings and decisions and appeals mean.  

Frobby will probably come on and explain it and if I study what he writes I'll probably comprehend the words, but I still won't know what it means to the bottom line.

Especially on a Friday night.  

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Is the Angelos law firm handling this or did they hire an outside firm?

Very high quality outside firms on both sides.   

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, SteveA said:

So does this mean anything real?  Does it change anything? 

I've given up trying to fathom what the concrete meaning of all of these rulings and decisions and appeals mean.  

Frobby will probably come on and explain it and if I study what he writes I'll probably comprehend the words, but I still won't know what it means to the bottom line.

Especially on a Friday night.  

Looks to me that all that happened is one more level of appeal is done.  I'm not sure why the Orioles are spending money on this since it looks like the chances of them winning are pretty remote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have been shocked if MASN had won its appeal.   The law is very heavily stacked to not overturn arbitration awards.   The prior decision that overturned the first award was a very rare exception.   MASN has one more level of appeal it can take, but it will almost certainly lose again.   

My recollection is that although MASN owes the Nats $100 mm in rights fees, about $30 mm of that is offset by a reduction in the Nats’ share of MASN’s profits.   (Higher rights fees —> lower profits for MASN so the Nats’ share of profits go down.)

Of course, by now we’re 4 years into the 5-year second “reset” period, and that one hasn’t even been the subject of an arbitration award yet.  
 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I would have been shocked if MASN had won its appeal.   The law is very heavily stacked to not overturn arbitration awards.   The prior decision that overturned the first award was a very rare exception.   MASN has one more level of appeal it can take, but it will almost certainly lose again.   

My recollection is that although MASN owes the Nats $100 mm in rights fees, about $30 mm of that is offset by a reduction in the Nats’ share of MASN’s profits.   (Higher rights fees —> lower profits for MASN so the Nats’ share of profits go down.)

Of course, by now we’re 4 years into the 5-year second “reset” period, and that one hasn’t even been the subject of an arbitration award yet.  
 

MASN and the Orioles do not have a right to appeal this decision to the Court of Appeals, NY's highest court. They have to ask the Court of Appeals to grant an appeal. It's hard to see any reason why the Court of Appeals would choose to get involved at this point.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

MASN and the Orioles do not have a right to appeal this decision to the Court of Appeals, NY's highest court. They have to ask the Court of Appeals to grant an appeal. It's hard to see any reason why the Court of Appeals would choose to get involved at this point.

Thanks.   Thought that was the case, but I wasn’t sure how it goes in NY state court.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found the Appellate Division decision.   To say they gave MASN’s arguments short shrift would be an understatement.   You can read the opinion here, and it takes about 60 seconds to read: 

http://nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_06039.htm

I agree with spiritof66 that the NY Court of Appeals will not hear a further appeal.    I don’t know how long MASN gets to petition that Court or how long it usually takes for the Court to indicate whether it will grant a hearing, but I’m guessing this will all be over in a couple more months.    

As a reminder, even though the total amount awarded in the second arbitration was close to the amount awarded the first time, the methodology was somewhat different and possibly more favorable towards MASN/the Orioles as applied to later periods.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Frobby said:

Thanks.   Thought that was the case, but I wasn’t sure how it goes in NY state court.   

There is a right to an appeal to the Court of Appeals under certain circumstances. MASN and the Orioles had a right to appeal to the Court of Appeals earlier because there was a dissent in the Appellate Division.  That's not the case here, and although some of the grounds for that right to appeal are pretty arcane and hard to assess, I don't see any basis for saying there's a right to appeal appeal here. It really doesn't matter much,  though, since that appeal probably would extend things only a little bit for the reasons you stated. 

I'm a little, by which I mean a lot, rusty as well as out of date on the timing, but I'll check with someone next week for an estimate of how long it takes the Court of Appeals to deny a weak motion for leave to appeal.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/23/2020 at 8:50 PM, SteveA said:

So does this mean anything real?  Does it change anything? 

I've given up trying to fathom what the concrete meaning of all of these rulings and decisions and appeals mean.  

Frobby will probably come on and explain it and if I study what he writes I'll probably comprehend the words, but I still won't know what it means to the bottom line.

Especially on a Friday night.  

BOY howdy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/23/2020 at 9:05 PM, Frobby said:

I would have been shocked if MASN had won its appeal.   The law is very heavily stacked to not overturn arbitration awards.   The prior decision that overturned the first award was a very rare exception.   MASN has one more level of appeal it can take, but it will almost certainly lose again.   

My recollection is that although MASN owes the Nats $100 mm in rights fees, about $30 mm of that is offset by a reduction in the Nats’ share of MASN’s profits.   (Higher rights fees —> lower profits for MASN so the Nats’ share of profits go down.)

Of course, by now we’re 4 years into the 5-year second “reset” period, and that one hasn’t even been the subject of an arbitration award yet.  
 

So basically...MLB made the decision to create MASN, and put the O's and Gnats in a room and told them to play tic-tac-toe till someone wins...

 

 

 

 

 

of course there would have been two years of court cases to see who goes first.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Roch said he anticipates them bringing new another SS.    Im hoping for Ha Seong Kim ....but I’m dreaming.    Id like to see Robertson signed for 3B and Ruiz released. Then Erick Mejia for SS....I think they both could be long term options or Elias sign to trade later guys.    
    • Well I think he definitely would want to.  That doesn’t mean he would want to in the sense that he has 1 or 2 free agents he would like to give a larger contract to but he may want to trade for a contract to get a prospect or 2. A lot of talk on here about how the Os are justified in being cheap coming off of 2020.  I personally think that talk is bs BUT I also agree that whatever it is that they can spend, would be less coming off of 2020.  It’s not like I’m clamoring for the days of a 130+M payroll. However, every other team has the same issues and there are other teams in that small to mid market area that would probably love to get rid of some contracts even if it meant giving up prospects.  This is going back to the Cozart deal last year and Elias saying he would do those types of deals.  I have zero doubt if he was allowed to spend that he would spend.  It doesn’t mean he’s signing a guy to a 3 year deal for 15-18M a year but it means that he would spend to get something he wants.    He is too smart, too knowledgeable and too hungry to increase his inventory to allow opportunities to go by him if he had the freedom to do whatever he wanted.
    • So...do we make any infield additions or is this it? 
    • In his morning article Roch is speculating 5/40 with 7 million to his KBO team.    Zero chance this O’s participate. But, I think it would be a bold move for the Orioles. If you subtract the 3.5 that they would’ve paid Iglesias if they kept him the net is really only 4 million per season including the posting. They are likely gonna bring in another experienced short stop and likely pay him 2-3 million.    Spend the saved 3.5 million and divert the 2-3 from the scrap heap guy that they are going to sign. If he hits you can deal him later for a pile and if not he’s a marginal risk at best coming out of your tv money. They have saved the amount to cover his contract over the last few seasons to cover its entirety
    • MLB Pipeline did a Top 10 on their podcast this week, including shreds on I guess NCAA sophomores who like Kjerstad in February/March may have done stuff for a few weeks.  It also acquainted me with the demographics of the basket where 1-5 will be one of them. Pirates 1 - Lawlar the HS shortstop Rangers 2 - Kumar Tigers 3 - McClain, some Madrigal-sized middle infielder from UCLA, maybe/maybe not SS Red Sox 4 - del Castillo, some slugging catcher from "The U" deemed best hitter in draft Orioles 5 - Leiter (I'd be glad with this outcome for polish going towards 2022 usefulness) D'Backs 6 - Jake Hill, the LSU right-hander, non-Vanderbilt best of SEC rest.   Guessing Ben may know him some. Royals 7 - Jud Zabian, Florida OF    <mock now at 6 straight NCAA after the high school SS character who seems impossible to get to 1-5> <hosts say these Top 7 are a clear tier in whatever order they fall> Rockies 8 - Alex Vanellas, Louisville 3B Angels 9 - Marcelo Mayer, high school SS #2 Mets 10 - James Wood, IMG Academy high school OF <nary a high school pitcher in these 10, though with draft pushed back to July, the Nick Bitsko analogs born in 2003 will have some extra time to strut their stuff, in case the next Kerry Wood, Josh Beckett or Dylan Bundy can only Netflix and chill right now>    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...