Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Can_of_corn

N.Y. Appeals Court Upholds 100M MASN Award

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Thanks for the update and reinforces why the team is cutting payroll and expenses.

Expecting to see this sign hanging from the warehouse.

b08557efb78a4cf2ede853125a43cba2.jpg

Also why they let all the MASN people go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Once again we get these periodic updates that I have no comprehension of the meaning.   This court says this, this one says that, etc. 

Do we have any bottom line as to when MASN will have to cut a check to the Nats and how much it will be?   Otherwise, this might as well be written in Greek for all I get out of it.

I can’t say when the check will be cut, but we know they have $99 mm in escrow they can’t spend while the appeal is playing out.    So it might as well be spent in terms of how MASN’s cash flow is affected.   
 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SteveA said:

Once again we get these periodic updates that I have no comprehension of the meaning.   This court says this, this one says that, etc. 

Do we have any bottom line as to when MASN will have to cut a check to the Nats and how much it will be?   Otherwise, this might as well be written in Greek for all I get out of it.

Glad I’m not the only one!!   Thanks for the updates and clarifications @Frobby   Hopefully this can be all behind us once the winning starts again.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Nationals had won an increase of annual rights fees since 2010 by the arbitrators over the first five year benchmark amount of $29 million per year for seasons 2005 through 2009.  The contract called for equal payments to both the Orioles and the Nationals each year.  That means that MASN must pay to the Orioles the same increase that it pays to the Nationals.  MLB had been paying that difference owed to the Nationals every year since MASN has tied up the contract in court.  MASN owes MLB that accumulated difference and the bill is coming due.  If MASN owes the Nationals $100 million then it also owes the Orioles additionally the same amount of $100 million plus whatever it owes to MLB.  Hence, that is the reason for the off-season fire sale.  I would guess that MASN might be close to bankruptcy.  I can see the one of several things happening.  The MASN contract which was to last for 20 years (2005 through 2024) could be dissolved by mutual agreement between the Nationals, the Orioles, and MLB.  The Orioles/MASN would be forgiven for what it owes MLB in exchange for freeing the Nationals from the contract and after paying off the Nationals what it owes them.  The Nationals and the Orioles would then negotiate their own separate RSN deals.  Each team would get to maintain the same TV footprint that it now enjoys with MASN.  However, the Orioles may want to offer the Nationals a 50% ownership share in MASN as an enticement to remain in and extend MASN past 2024.  The Orioles, whether they want to admit it or not, now need the Nationals as a partner.  The Orioles are now a small market team.  They need the full penetration of the Greater Washington, DC market in order to prosper.  Peter Angelos actually admitted this in 2004 as a reason he did not want the Montreal Expos to move to Washington.  The Nationals will not remain in any RSN that partners them with the Orioles nor should they.  The Orioles have been backstabbing the Nationals ever since the Expos moved from Montreal to Washington for 2005.  Peter Angelos forced the Nationals and MLB into a draconian television deal because of his intense hatred of Washington Baseball.  Instead of welcoming the Nationals into the region, he fought them in every way that he could.  Instead of offering the Nationals a 50% interest in MASN, he offered them a deal that would see them gain a maximum of only 33% equity by 2025.  Instead of offering to market each team throughout the region by selling each others tickets at each stadium he closed up the Orioles store in downtown DC.  Peter Angelos has maintained a legacy of hatred against the Nationals.  He has forbidden the Orioles from any dealings with the Nationals including player transactions or joint team promotions.  The Nationals must sever any financial relationship that it has with Orioles as long as the Angelos family has control of the team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • It seems like that the only possible way that the O’s (or most teams for that matter) can compete is by building an elite farm system.  Given how hard and how slow that process is, I wanted to ask the O’s experts on here a few simple question for discussion:   1. how long would you estimate that it takes for a team to go from a mediocre/poor farm system, to a system that has produced enough major league talent to win in the AL east?  Additionally, how long in your opinion does the pro club need to suck while building the farm. 2. is there a team that you would prefer that the O’s model their approach after?  Is it Tampa?  Toronto? St. Louis?  I think the Tampa model is the most brutally efficient, but I can’t see many people truly being happy with that model in the long haul (getting rid of good players while value is high, rarely spending a dollar in FA). 3. do you like the financial model of baseball as opposed to other professional leagues?  Baseball has always been my favorite sport, but it really seems to favor the larger market teams in the end.  Not that smaller market teams can’t compete, it’s just that every year it seems the larger market teams win.  I know there are some poor large market orgs, but I personally get disinterested when I see how imbalanced the competitive landscape can be at times.  
    • Same chance of getting you a championship in 2022.
    • o   lllllllllllllllllllllll. (vs. MARINERS, 12:35 PM)       llllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll        llllllllllllllllllllll.l (vs. MARINERS, 4:05 PM)     llllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll    o
    • Contracts like Davis really hurts the game overall more than it hurts the individual team. Typically teams that have a bad contract just pick up and move on from the player...meanwhile the fans hold a grudge towards the player. Baltimore is doing a disservice to the game by not releasing him and moving on.
    • Yikes. Here's what the O's gave up in 24 hrs.:     WAR, 1991 ff.     Finley        43.5     Harnisch    17.6     Schilling    80.2     Tettleton    17.9     Total lost: 159.2 Davis        0.2     Robinson    -0.6     Total gained: -0.4         Total, net: 159.6 10 yrs    16 WAR/yr.     16 yrs.    10 WAR/yr.    
    • My wife and I went to Sunday's game with another couple and had a great time. A couple observations: - Bottom line up front is that I'd very much encourage folks to go. We've been relatively cautious during Covid, but really at no point felt cramped or uncomfortable. Certainly some of that is that now most of the folks I was with were fully vaccinated, but there's plenty of space in between seats and really not that many people. Even coming into the stadium and in concession lines, people were generally respectful of distance and it was no issue. I'm sure, anecdotally, there will always be someone messing up, but it wasn't an issue for us. Just wanted to start with that context for those that harbor understandable apprehensions, acknowledging everyone has different circumstances/risk perceptions. - Definitely make sure you read the modified regulations before you go - the issue with purses and parking, as some folks noted above, are definitely present. You've just got to be aware of them and plan (my wife switched out her purse just before leaving the house, and my friend's wife had a borderline-sized purse that got waved through after a little negotiation). I can't speak for parking, as we just did a garage on Pratt. - Mobile ticketing and electronic payments were all fully in use, so do recommend just coming prepared. If you're comfortable with using them, it's no issue, but understand some people aren't as tech savvy. Just a pretty minor planning factor. - Regarding masks, most people were good about wearing them, though clearly some of that slipped when people were sitting at their seats. I did see a few times where ushers enforced the masking at your seat rule, but it didn't seem overly draconian (it wasn't that if your beer left your lips for more than two seconds and your mask wasn't up, ushers would descend on you). Those patrons I observed were mostly compliant when directed (except the stray Phillies fan who decided to be difficult). Although I know some folks aren't crazy about it, to be honest, I've been at work every day for the last year wearing a mask the entire time for 8+ hours, so I'm not especially sympathetic. Little bit of a pain, but won't kill ya for a couple hours. - As others have stated, most but not all concessions appeared to be open. Prices did feel a touch on the steep side, but I'd bet they're comparable to what they were in 2019. The O's clearly haven't moved to the Ravens modified pricing. - Lastly, the bar scene before the game was of course quite different than normal, but still very workable and pleasant. Pickles, Sliders, etc have taken over huge spaces in front of their buildings, with plentiful tables well-spaced out. We got to Sliders at maybe 11:45 before a 1 o'clock game on a Sunday, and we had no issue getting a table. Again, overall would recommend folks go, if you're comfortable. I'll tell you it was absolutely great to get back out there and do something normal after having been cooped up for so long.
    • One last thought. When the reserve clause died in court and all players could become free agents every year, the players union was smart and agreed to a service requirement. It was good for salaries and good for the sport to control supply/demand, even if it seemed like a giveaway by the players. If there was a non-performance clause built into free agent contracts that gave some level of relief to owners, it would benefit salaries and the sport. Small to mid size teams would have more ability to chase top talent because the affect of a bad contract would be less calamitous to their limited payroll means if it was discounted by some percentage for non-performance. Ask Scott Boras if he’d rather have three teams bidding for his client or six. Our very own Albert Belle contract made insuring contracts fairly cost prohibitive (though it kinda seems like we’re keeping Davis on the roster for some reason other than insanity). But that practice of insuring contracts showed that there’s more money to spend on players if you give owners some level of protection from disaster contracts like Davis. Owners used to pay huge amounts to insure contracts before they became cost prohibitive. So if it’s good for competitiveness by allowing smaller teams to be more aggressive, and it’s good for player salaries, and it’s good for owners by protecting their investments, by what principle is a player entitled to the full value of a contract that they have essentially defaulted on for non-performance? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...