Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
VaBird1

Orioles Agree to Deal With Severino

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Stewart does not get AB's whether Nunez is here or not.  That's ridiculous.  Nunez would be the full time DH.  The outfield would be Mountcastle, Hays, Santander,  with Mancini at 1B.  Stewart would be getting scrub AB's assuming he even made the team which would be less likely with Nunez here.

Stewart can still play 3-4 days a week.

Between injuries, days off, sharing time with Nunez, etc....he gets his at bats.  He won’t get 500+ at bats but somewhere between 300-400?  Sure.

Im guessing that Mancini isn’t going to be an everyday guy right off the bat.  He will get a day or 2 off a week early on.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Stewart can still play 3-4 days a week.

Between injuries, days off, sharing time with Nunez, etc....he gets his at bats.  He won’t get 500+ at bats but somewhere between 300-400?  Sure.

Im guessing that Mancini isn’t going to be an everyday guy right off the bat.  He will get a day or 2 off a week early on.  

Mancini will play everyday.  He's either ready to play or he's not.  Why do we assume he needs rest because he would have had chemo 9 months prior?

Unless there is injury,  Stewart would be looking at 1 start per week.  If everyone was healthy he probably wouldn't even make sense as a reserve. He'd be getting everyday AB's in Norfolk as an insurance policy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A good thing about Mancini is that, IIRC, he hits well as a DH.  So, if he does need to be eased into action, which would not surprise me, he can be productive at DH.  As noted by others, many players just don't hit as well at DH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Mancini will play everyday.  He's either ready to play or he's not.  Why do we assume he needs rest because he would have had chemo 9 months prior?

Unless there is injury,  Stewart would be looking at 1 start per week.  If everyone was healthy he probably wouldn't even make sense as a reserve. He'd be getting everyday AB's in Norfolk as an insurance policy.

Ehh, I could see them easing Mancini in some, again just to start.  They may not but wouldn’t surprise me.

I would also be fine with DJ being in the minors to start the year but I disagree that the at bats wouldn’t be there for him.  It’s pretty simple to figure that out.  And yes, injuries are all but guaranteed to occur with the players we are talking about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

A good thing about Mancini is that, IIRC, he hits well as a DH.  So, if he does need to be eased into action, which would not surprise me, he can be productive at DH.  As noted by others, many players just don't hit as well at DH.

And this is the other thing no one wants to talk about.  Maybe DHing these young kids is a bad way to develop them.  People are like, just DH Hays and Mountcastle, etc...well maybe that doesn’t work well for you them.

Frobby pointed this out before but DHing isn’t for everyone and when you have a guy who does well at it, there’s nothing wrong with keeping that guy around, especially if they are really cheap.

I, for one, don’t have much interest in seeing most of those guys getting any kind of regular at bats at DH.  Stewart is the exception to that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

And this is the other thing no one wants to talk about.  Maybe DHing these young kids is a bad way to develop them.  People are like, just DH Hays and Mountcastle, etc...well maybe that doesn’t work well for you them.

Frobby pointed this out before but DHing isn’t for everyone and when you have a guy who does well at it, there’s nothing wrong with keeping that guy around, especially if they are really cheap.

I, for one, don’t have much interest in seeing most of those guys getting any kind of regular at bats at DH.  Stewart is the exception to that.

Even with players you prefer to use ay DH it doesn't always work. Mark Trumbo in his career put up a .862 OPS playing RF, .764 at 1B and only .695 at DH and Trumbo was a player suited ideally to be a DH.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

A good thing about Mancini is that, IIRC, he hits well as a DH.  So, if he does need to be eased into action, which would not surprise me, he can be productive at DH.  As noted by others, many players just don't hit as well at DH.

Yep.

In 58 games as DH, he has his highest average (.290) and 15 home runs. While in the field, he had many more games (87, 149, 182) with  lower average and only slight more home runs (20, 26, and 24).

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, owknows said:

I would guess that Pedro saw the lion's share of the young, jumpy, control issue pitchers.

I think it's a little rich to blame Severino's defense last year on the pitching. He really was lazy at times.

I also think that maybe he just had a down year. Sometimes you get into bad habits. My recollection was that he had a positive defensive reputation when we brought him in originally. Hopefully he can re-focus on pitch blocking so he can prevent wild pitches and not allow passed balls. I assume the O's are hoping as much too.

With that said, I think the problem with criticism of this move is the assumption that we could get as good, or nearly as good, on the cheap (which this deal is). I'm not convinced that the total value of an available minimum salary catcher would be  comparable. I don't love Severino, but I suspect he'd be orders of magnitude better than a guy like Wynns or Sisco over a large sample size.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t think the backup NEEDS to be anything.  Why does the backup have to be outstanding on defense?  Is that in the rule books or something?

I completely reject the notion that defense is all you need at any particular position, such as SS or C.    At every position, the analysis is the same: does this guy add more runs with his bat than he subtracts with his glove (or vice versa).    Derek Jeter is widely regarded a poor defensive SS but he was an excellent hitter and his teams were way better off having him than not.    Ditto Mike Piazza at C.     Those are extreme examples but there are dozens if not hundreds of other examples.    Some fans are offended by players or teams that are good with the bat but below average with the glove, but I say, whatever works.   The Dodgers were a -15.3 defensive team this year, per Fangraphs.   23rd of 30 teams.   Think their fans care?

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I completely reject the notion that defense is all you need at any particular position, such as SS or C.    At every position, the analysis is the same: does this guy add more runs with his bat than he subtracts with his glove (or vice versa).    Derek Jeter is widely regarded a poor defensive SS but he was an excellent hitter and his teams were way better off having him than not.    Ditto Mike Piazza at C.     Those are extreme examples but there are dozens if not hundreds of other examples.    Some fans are offended by players or teams that are good with the bat but below average with the glove, but I say, whatever works.   The Dodgers were a -15.3 defensive team this year, per Fangraphs.   23rd of 30 teams.   Think their fans care?

I'm picturing one disgruntled Dodger fan on a Dodger message board complaining about how his joy in a WS is tainted by the team's poor defense.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I completely reject the notion that defense is all you need at any particular position, such as SS or C.    At every position, the analysis is the same: does this guy add more runs with his bat than he subtracts with his glove (or vice versa).    Derek Jeter is widely regarded a poor defensive SS but he was an excellent hitter and his teams were way better off having him than not.    Ditto Mike Piazza at C.     Those are extreme examples but there are dozens if not hundreds of other examples.    Some fans are offended by players or teams that are good with the bat but below average with the glove, but I say, whatever works.   The Dodgers were a -15.3 defensive team this year, per Fangraphs.   23rd of 30 teams.   Think their fans care?

Cue @Old#5fan defending Luis Hernandez and the all-glove model of shortstop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I completely reject the notion that defense is all you need at any particular position, such as SS or C.    At every position, the analysis is the same: does this guy add more runs with his bat than he subtracts with his glove (or vice versa).    Derek Jeter is widely regarded a poor defensive SS but he was an excellent hitter and his teams were way better off having him than not.    Ditto Mike Piazza at C.     Those are extreme examples but there are dozens if not hundreds of other examples.    Some fans are offended by players or teams that are good with the bat but below average with the glove, but I say, whatever works.   The Dodgers were a -15.3 defensive team this year, per Fangraphs.   23rd of 30 teams.   Think their fans care?

Yea it’s annoying.  It’s like saying the lead off hitter has to be fast.

No they don’t. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, LookinUp said:

I think it's a little rich to blame Severino's defense last year on the pitching. He really was lazy at times.

I also think that maybe he just had a down year. Sometimes you get into bad habits. My recollection was that he had a positive defensive reputation when we brought him in originally. Hopefully he can re-focus on pitch blocking so he can prevent wild pitches and not allow passed balls. I assume the O's are hoping as much too.

With that said, I think the problem with criticism of this move is the assumption that we could get as good, or nearly as good, on the cheap (which this deal is). I'm not convinced that the total value of an available minimum salary catcher would be  comparable. I don't love Severino, but I suspect he'd be orders of magnitude better than a guy like Wynns or Sisco over a large sample size.

Out of curiosity, why have you written off Sisco?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, linedrive said:

I'm guessing Elias thinks he'll be able to make a trade at some point. I think this will turn out to be a good move in the long run.

Agreed. Catcher is a position a lot of potential contenders look to bolster at the deadline, particularly because you typically need two of them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • The blue minor 7th's in that, Bessie AND Louis, just raise goosebumps on my arms!
    • If 2022 is like 2012, and Gunnar Henderson plus one whole summer of "Skill Development" can approach Machado's precocity. I do hope the need to slide to 3B is for something a bit more fun than JJ Hardy though! If Henderson can outplay Westburg for the Baysox SS gig and hold his own at 19/20 in AA, I don't know where else but the next year picture there is to go (we do like AAA MVP awards though). With all the thoroughbred hype, an Aberdeen/Delmarva starting assignment pair for these two is "C'mon man" material.   Vavra was a college guy who went to the Sally and was MVP, but he was a 3rd rounder. I grant AA for either of them is a big ask, but don't know how you work it if you think both are SS and need the game reps.
    • I didn't watch him last year but he had a serious decline in defensive value last year after being one of the best the years before. Now again, maybe something was bothering him or maybe he put on some weight and has it off now, i don't know. I'm not necessarily against this move, and I don't really think Martin or Urias are every day SS at the big league level, but I guess I also don't see him as being a big help. But, as it's been pointed out, it's pretty clear that winning ball games is not a huge priority for Elias yet.
    • If Galvis’ glove is as bad as you say then he may not last half a season before Martin is up. They have to think he is superior to Martin. Will find out. 
    • How is he the same as Iglesias defensively?  Galvis had a -3 OAA and -4% success added at SS last year compared to Igelisas at 3 OAA and 5% SA. That's a 6 OAA difference and 9% success added  difference.  If you wanted those numbers defensively I think Sanchez or Martin could have done that. Heck, maybe even Urias.  Now, he was much better in 2019 and 2018, so why the big drop off? I worry when players entering the season at 31 and coming off a big drop in defensive ability. Now maybe something was bothering him, I don't know, and I guess he's cheap enough, but those statcast offensive numbers are pretty putrid and if he's not going to bring a great glove, then why not give those PAs to Martin or even Urias? I guess in a year where it probably doesn't matter, I just don't see how this upgrades us all that much.
    • Of course they will play the service time game with him.    Only way I could see any scenario he could be up is a Manny type situation. Club is somehow in contention and has a hole to fill. 
    • Well if he hits a legit .400 as you suggested this year... I wouldn't bank on him being up by 2022, but it's possible.  He'd be 21 in June of 2022.  He'd have to have an outstanding 2021 minor league season and carry it over to the start of 2022 in order to get promoted.  I'm sure we'll hear CoC's thoughts on the Orioles gaming his service clock at some point. All depends on how well he does.  But I do think that if he's up in 2022, that's a good thing...means he's turned into a stud.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...