Jump to content
weams

Orioles Lose Zach Pop and Grey Fenter in Rule Five

Recommended Posts

Just now, Sports Guy said:

I don’t see how he is going to be used is relevant at all.  If he pitches once every 2 weeks, it was still wrong to not protect him.

It's relevant to the kind of pitcher he may be. Stuff and command are big parts of being a major league pitcher, but when it comes to being a relief pitcher, how that pitcher rebounds back is a big issue as well. 

I'm not saying this is a problem with Pop, but it's something you have to keep an eye on, especially if he's a one inning guy. this is why it's not always easy to just take a starter and make him a reliever because the rest it takes is different for guys.

Again, it may not be an issue at all, but let's say for instance he needs two days rest between appearances than his value is limited.

I'm not taking up for not protecting him because I already named three pitchers who were protected who should have never have been protected over a healthy Pop. You could of added Bannon and Ruiz as well on to the list of guys I would not have protected over him.

But the book has not been completed on this story. I think this was a misstep, but not a catastrophic one. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

It's relevant to the kind of pitcher he may be. Stuff and command are big parts of being a major league pitcher, but when it comes to being a relief pitcher, how that pitcher rebounds back is a big issue as well. 

I'm not saying this is a problem with Pop, but it's something you have to keep an eye on, especially if he's a one inning guy. this is why it's not always easy to just take a starter and make him a reliever because the rest it takes is different for guys.

Again, it may not be an issue at all, but let's say for instance he needs two days rest between appearances than his value is limited.

I'm not taking up for not protecting him because I already named three pitchers who were protected who should have never have been protected over a healthy Pop. You could of added Bannon and Ruiz as well on to the list of guys I would not have protected over him.

But the book has not been completed on this story. I think this was a misstep, but not a catastrophic one. 

Totally agree it’s not a catastrophic one unless he develops into a shut down reliever.  While possible, I would peg that as unlikely.  He is more likely to settle into a 6th/7th inning type role, 3.5ish ERA guy.  
 

Solid contributor but not one that is hard to find.  Otoh, it would be nice to have that arm making no money for a while but it’s certainly not collapsing your franchise that he’s gone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t see how he is going to be used is relevant at all.  If he pitches once every 2 weeks, it was still wrong to not protect him.

 

47 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

It's relevant to the kind of pitcher he may be. Stuff and command are big parts of being a major league pitcher, but when it comes to being a relief pitcher, how that pitcher rebounds back is a big issue as well. 

I'm not saying this is a problem with Pop, but it's something you have to keep an eye on, especially if he's a one inning guy. this is why it's not always easy to just take a starter and make him a reliever because the rest it takes is different for guys.

Again, it may not be an issue at all, but let's say for instance he needs two days rest between appearances than his value is limited.

I'm not taking up for not protecting him because I already named three pitchers who were protected who should have never have been protected over a healthy Pop. You could of added Bannon and Ruiz as well on to the list of guys I would not have protected over him.

But the book has not been completed on this story. I think this was a misstep, but not a catastrophic one. 

It also matters to the Marlins POV. And filling innings. You know how obsessed Elias and Hyde have been all spring about stretching guys out. Trying to have every reliever able to go at least 2 innings.  If the Marlins have troubles with starters going short, and Pop can't pitch back to back or multi innings, if they get in a crunch you know a Rule V is going to be top of the list to send out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Refresh me on the rules. If they return him, he is not on the 40 man? It's basically like a minor league contract?

He has to clear all the way through waivers then returned to us and doesn’t need to be on 40 man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Refresh me on the rules. If they return him, he is not on the 40 man? It's basically like a minor league contract?

Jose Batista went through 4 teams when he was rule 5.  Orioles, Royals, Rays then back to Pirates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

Jose Batista went through 4 teams when he was rule 5.  Orioles, Royals, Rays then back to Pirates.

And eventually starting his "special" workout program and becoming a star with the Blue Jays. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, bpilktree said:

He has to clear all the way through waivers then returned to us and doesn’t need to be on 40 man.

Actually, once he clears waivers he is offered back to us for $50K.  The original team is not required to take him back, although they do most of the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, bpilktree said:

Jose Batista went through 4 teams when he was rule 5.  Orioles, Royals, Rays then back to Pirates.

Actually Bautista and Tony Batista 😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Minor League Depth Chart

2021 Prospect Power Rankings

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Real good combo    Using baseball reference  WAR Franco  -0.9 Valaika -0.6 Mountcastle -0.4 Wilkerson -0.4 Stewart -0.3 Santnader -0.3 Wynns -0.2 Combined  catchers is -0.3. Sisco was -0.3. Sevy is 0.2 3rd base -0.9  Combined 2nd  -0.6  Valaika, Urias 0.5, Wilkerson and Ruiz -0.1. I know some of these guys move around some but you get the point.  Thats -1.8 from those players playing those 3 spots . You basically have 3 positions that are brutal right now.  Hays 0.6 and Santander aren’t healthy and aren’t producing as like than can.  Stewart plays more in the OF than he should because of this. Mountcastle is playing well now but his glove never developed in LF.    Other than Mullins not much has gone right. Galvis has been serviceable. Mancini obviously.    The collective position player WAR is 2.9. Mullins, Mancini and Galvis are at 5.0 combined Mullins alone is at 3.0. So minus Mullins the rest of the team combined is at -0.1.     Pitching collectively is at 2.9 total WAR. Means alone is at 3.2. Fry and Sulser 0.8, Zimmerman is at 0.7, Scott 0.6 and Wells 0.5. Sceroler and Lakins are at -0.5 each. Armstrong was at -0.6 and Harvey is at -1.6.    At the end of the day Means and Mullins combine for 6.2 WAR and yet the team total is at 5.8. Just unreal. 
    • I love Jace Jung and would love to get him with the second pick next year. Is he eligible next year as a SO? 
    • Rushing can, at least to me, mean a few different things.   1) Moving up a prospect before their production at the current level shows they 'deserve' said promotion.  This move can be done for any number of reasons (team needs, being pushed, fan impatience, etc) but if a player is barely holding their own against A pitching, then it doesn't make much sense to move them to AA when they will be facing even better and more challenging pitchers.  Give them the time to figure things out at the 'lesser' level being giving them a further challenge.  And frankly I think that's it right there, we want them to be challenged, but not overwhelmed.  If a lower level is still a challenge for them, moving them higher is rushing them in my opinion.  Of course words like 'challenge' and 'overwhelmed' is a bit subjective, but for the most part we know it when we see it. 2) It can also mean from the team perspective, as in service time manipulation.  While it's very a much a case by case basis, the needs of the franchise can come before the needs of the player.  While we may argue if that's right or wrong, it IS part of the current system.  In some cases it makes sense to bring up a phenom and start their clock early...in some cases it doesn't make sense.  Clearly we've been arguing this at the hangout for a long time, and will continue to do so as long as it is in the rules and keeps happening, but a player can be rushed from a team perspective...just because a player is dominating AAA or whatever, does not automatically mean he should be with the MLB club.  At the end of the day a GM is responsible for BOTH the well being of his players and the needs of his franchise.  Service time manipulation and preventing super 2 status, etc, needs to be a factor in the decision making process.  Bringing them up 'too soon' could also be rushing them from a franchise standpoint. 3) Finally rushing could also happen if it screws with other players in the system.  With a smaller minor leagues, there are only so many spots, only so many at bats.  If you have good prospects at a position in all levels (A, AA, AAA) then when you move a guy up you either need to move the person he's taking at bats away from up also, or possibly down.  What you don't want to see is top prospects riding the bench as there are too many quality players at that level.  I'm not saying that currently applies to the Orioles as AAA doesn't have much talent.  But as we've seen with the shuffling in positions in our A and AA squads among the many talented infielders (I love having to say that) having too much at one level can hinder the growth of those around them.   Long and short I think it depends on perspective.  Some only seem to look at what's best for the player, some seem to only look at what's best for the long term franchise, some only look at what's best for the current team, and some look at all factors.  I'm not sure there is a clear cut 'this is a rushed player', though we can clearly find examples of players that were rushed historically.
    • First inning looked good. I think he got left to die out there because of the blowout. I mean he was pitching into his 4th inning which is a bit ridiculous. I think in a normal game he's out as soon as he allows his first run.
    • I feel like the majority of the board felt Lowther was being slow played the last few years so when he finally got to the bigs it didn't feel like he was rushed. But I'm not exactly sure why he was pegged to be the yo-yo guy over anyone else. I think they probably just thought he had enough experience.
    • Have to admit those AAA numbers are fairly impressive. Good to see him playing well at that level.
    • At this point, Santander is clearly not healthy.  They may as well promote Nevin to get regular at bats at DH/OF, while also promoting Jones and DFAing Wilkerson. None of that will injure the rebuild, and the team absolutely SUCKS right now - it's not like things can get worse at the ML level. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...