Jump to content
Just Regular

Ryan Mountcastle and some 24-year olds

Recommended Posts

With apologies to Means and Santander, Mountcastle's debut was something of a tipping point to me as the first Guy I look to as a durably good contributor to the Next Good Team.   Like me, Hank Aaron and Adley Rutschman, he's a February birthday, and RMC will play his Age 24 season in 2021.   How well he holds up against his fellow 24's these next 6 years (5 if we don't tender final Arb) will somewhat drive how good the team is.

A few very likely superior 24's in 2021 and forever and ever: Devers, Albies, Gleyber, Hiura, Eloy

A group of 9 others: Kyle Tucker, Trent Grisham, Willi Castro, Yordan Alvarez, Victor Robles, Alec Bohm, Ke'Bryan Hayes, Austin Riley, Nick Madrigal

With Mountcastle himself as the 10th guy, where do you peg him in that group?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good topic.    I have to say, that’s a pretty talented crop of position players.    I’d put Alvarez and Bohm at the top of your list of ten.    I’d probably put Tucker next.  Beyond that, it’s a bit of a crapshoot but I think they’ll all be productive major leaguers.    

The draft pedigree is interesting 

Bohm 1:3

Madrigal 1:4

Tucker 1:5

Grisham 1:15

Hayes 1:32

Mountcastle 1:36

Riley 1:41

Alvarez IFA $2 mm bonus

Castro IFA $825 k bonus 

Robles IFA $225 k bonus

FWIW, a typical age cohort will produce 15-20 position players who produce 10+ WAR in their careers.   15 players were listed in the OP.    It would be interesting to look back in 10 years and see how many of these players made that cut, and who made it who’s not on your list.  

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/24/2020 at 11:41 AM, Just Regular said:

A few very likely superior 24's in 2021 and forever and ever: Devers, Albies, Gleyber, Hiura, Eloy

A group of 9 others: Kyle Tucker, Trent Grisham, Willi Castro, Yordan Alvarez, Victor Robles, Alec Bohm, Ke'Bryan Hayes, Austin Riley, Nick Madrigal

With Mountcastle himself as the 10th guy, where do you peg him in that group?

By simple B-Ref WAR, Mountcastle 0.9 was 7th in the group of 10 where I guessed maybe it was a fair fight.

He also beat 3 out of 5 of his "betters" in counting stats, with an Eloy injury assist.    Austin Riley and Kyle Tucker were >2 wins better than anyone else in the group with 6-win seasons.

Alec Bohm's -1.3 WAR group worst.   He was a college slugger I bet our models would have considered, and Dombrowski is going to keep bedazzling that Bryce roster until something gives.    In Fantasyland I'm earmarking Mullins for that Gleyber/Jasson acquisition (perhaps 2021's pleasantest development Elias could place that call just to troll), and Bohm was so bad even Means feels like a lot.   Sports Guy already had it they want to upgrade middle infield, and they have $15M apiece on somewhat stale Segura and Didi.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d like to see Mountcastle work on his defense since know he knows 1B is his home. Heck, maybe even had some more muscle since he doesn’t have to run around LF. 
 

Mountcastle’s defense will improve as the rest of the infield settles in. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I’d like to see Mountcastle work on his defense since know he knows 1B is his home. Heck, maybe even had some more muscle since he doesn’t have to run around LF. 
 

Mountcastle’s defense will improve as the rest of the infield settles in. 

RMC's defense improved significantly over the course of season.  Hopefully the upward trend continues, especially with a full offseason and spring training.  He'll never be a gold glover, but he could someday be considered average at least.

Regarding bulking up, I don't think it would help Ryan much at all anyways.  He's in very good shape, very explosive, and seems very durable with very little injury history.  No need to mess that up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, yark14 said:

RMC's defense improved significantly over the course of season.  Hopefully the upward trend continues, especially with a full offseason and spring training.  He'll never be a gold glover, but he could someday be considered average at least.

Who’s to say he’ll never be a gold glover?   The bar’s not that high.   Both Rtot and Rdrs had him at -1 this year, barely below average.   No reason he can’t improve from there.    

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Frobby said:

Who’s to say he’ll never be a gold glover?   The bar’s not that high.   Both Rtot and Rdrs had him at -1 this year, barely below average.   No reason he can’t improve from there.    

I like the idea of having a former left-side-of-the-infield glove at 1st base. I think he'll get better as the position becomes more second-nature to him. Yes, he was a failed prospect defensively at SS and 3b, but he played at a high enough level there in lower levels to guess that he's got good footwork, mechanics, and athletic ability to do well at 1st. I think his early experience as a 3bman really helped Davis grow into being a good 1bman at his peak, and I have similar hopes for Mountcastle. 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Sanfran327 said:

I like the idea of having a former left-side-of-the-infield glove at 1st base. I think he'll get better as the position becomes more second-nature to him. Yes, he was a failed prospect defensively at SS and 3b, but he played at a high enough level there in lower levels to guess that he's got good footwork, mechanics, and athletic ability to do well at 1st. I think his early experience as a 3bman really helped Davis grow into being a good 1bman at his peak, and I have similar hopes for Mountcastle. 

I’m with you.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sanfran327 said:

I like the idea of having a former left-side-of-the-infield glove at 1st base. I think he'll get better as the position becomes more second-nature to him. Yes, he was a failed prospect defensively at SS and 3b, but he played at a high enough level there in lower levels to guess that he's got good footwork, mechanics, and athletic ability to do well at 1st. I think his early experience as a 3bman really helped Davis grow into being a good 1bman at his peak, and I have similar hopes for Mountcastle. 

Agree. I really think he started to get comfy and confident over there. He made some nice plays, he's going to settle in just fine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really excited about Mountcastle's raw power. I think his peak home run numbers could be really impressive. I think a 45 homer year (or two or three) is a realistic possibility. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Sanfran327 said:

I like the idea of having a former left-side-of-the-infield glove at 1st base. I think he'll get better as the position becomes more second-nature to him. Yes, he was a failed prospect defensively at SS and 3b, but he played at a high enough level there in lower levels to guess that he's got good footwork, mechanics, and athletic ability to do well at 1st. I think his early experience as a 3bman really helped Davis grow into being a good 1bman at his peak, and I have similar hopes for Mountcastle. 

Yep, and that is another reason not to have him unnecessarily bulk up.  Keep him agile for the shifts against righties.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, yark14 said:

Yep, and that is another reason not to have him unnecessarily bulk up.  Keep him agile for the shifts against righties.

He's got plenty of power already, but I think you'll see him naturally get bigger and stronger as he enters his physical prime. Just being around a professional sports team and the exercise and nutrition regimens available to him should result in additional muscle. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2021 Orioles Stats

2021 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • He pitches with an attitude. I like that.
    • One thing we have in abundance that others do not is opportunity. We have the ability to give these players time to see if they can figure it out. In two years, the bulk of our top talent will be ready to join the club. This year and next will be dedicated to finding out which pieces fit into the mix of what we have already drafted. The rest will come through pulling out the checkbook to fill the spots we need to be a World Series winner. I’m glad you guys are waking up and getting comfortable with the realization that we are two years away. It takes patience but that patience is going to pay off. Also, invest in HMBL. Thank you.
    • 2011-2012 saw a 24-game improvement. A lot of that was was lucky pick ups(Hammel, Mclouth, Saunders) and calling up Manny. In 2013, we regressed to 85, which is probably a better indicator of how good the team was without the luck we had in 2012, but it is true that we can add 25 wins in 2022 without ruining the damn “Plan” We need to have good seasons from our prospects, and if guys like Mateo win a spot, they have to produce. Can Mateo give us a 2 WAR season? I don’t know. He hasn’t, but the potential is certainly there. Tanner Scott never has, and yet we keep throwing his lame ass out there. Chance Sisco was awful from day 1, but we kept him for way too long. No reason not to give Mateo a chance.  but I digress. If 2-3 of our high prospect arms meet their potential, if we acquire a good infielder, Santander is healthy, and Good and AR come up quickly, then sure we can. That’s a lot of IF, but it’s neither impossible, nor even improbable. Its all a question of whether Mike wants to wait.
    • I don't disagree with that conceptually, but I don't think it's going to happen simply because I don't think other teams will pony up the kind of return we'd need to justify trading Means, and for the same kinds of concerns that make me open to trading him.....that I don't trust he'll be able to perform at the same level he's presently seen as being. 
    • I think trading Means and leaving Grayson without a veteran in the rotation is not a good move.   So acquire the veteran starter first then maybe it makes more sense to trade Means.  Frankly, I don't think it going to happen.
    • Spent some time the other night looking at other rosters and Miami, Texas, Atlanta, and San Francisco looked like the best bets for dealing Mullins. And the kind of prospects SF could deal from didn't wow me. Same with Philadelphia. Roll Tide's suggestion of Jung/Winn seems like a reach to me, but that would be a great deal.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...