Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

MLB.com: O’s farm system is the 4th-most improved

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think he's curious how you know what the future levels of spending would be.  Considering the change in ownership.

That's part of it.  I don't think we really have any idea what future payrolls will be in a post-pandemic world of cable-cutters, especially with league-wide attendance declines before COVID, and the ownership change.  On top of all that the Orioles have had a payroll significantly exceeding $120M three times, ever.  To me assuming a $120-150M payroll for the foreseeable future is premature, at best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course it is. New CBA coming next year too.

I *think * it's still fair to assume that revenue will grow over time league wide. It's also fair to assume that local revenue will grow if the team performs significantly better and becomes significantly more interesting.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That's part of it.  I don't think we really have any idea what future payrolls will be in a post-pandemic world of cable-cutters, especially with league-wide attendance declines before COVID, and the ownership change.  On top of all that the Orioles have had a payroll significantly exceeding $120M three times, ever.  To me assuming a $120-150M payroll for the foreseeable future is premature, at best.

Important to note, though, that they were running those payrolls right before the team recently bottomed-out, then they started slashing. In an environment with payrolls increasing over time, the fact that they were nowhere near that level in-say-2003 isn't particularly instructive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That's part of it.  I don't think we really have any idea what future payrolls will be in a post-pandemic world of cable-cutters, especially with league-wide attendance declines before COVID, and the ownership change.  On top of all that the Orioles have had a payroll significantly exceeding $120M three times, ever.  To me assuming a $120-150M payroll for the foreseeable future is premature, at best.

And those 3 years were recent and there is a lot of money pouring into the game, 2020 notwithstanding.

Im comfortable with what I said.  Not really concerned that it’s wrong.  They definitely can afford it.  Now, you never know if they will do it but as the core starts to get arb eligible and you sign a few FA, it’s pretty easy to get to those numbers.

Prior to those mid 2010s, the Orioles weren’t producing a lot of players that you would keep for arb eligible seasons.  They did then and hopefully with Elias, they will continue to do that.

I don’t think they will be Tampa and just have to trade anyone that is in arb2 or later years.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, weams said:

He was a Bio-Genesis guy. They excel at micro dosing. Close to game time. Showering for a while after. 

Well without evidence, nothing remains. Although he did fail a couple tests, I think. Suspended twice?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Philip said:

Well without evidence, nothing remains. Although he did fail a couple tests, I think. Suspended twice?

It was Davis who failed twice. Cruz was only caught one and there was plenty of evidence. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, weams said:

It was Davis who failed twice. Cruz was only caught one and there was plenty of evidence. 

Oh I don’t doubt the test results. He was with the Rangers when he failed. But he said all the right “I’m sorry” stuff and folks have let it go. If he’s been using since, He could make as much money selling the trick as he’s made hitting the ball, because no doubt he is definitely still hitting the ball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Sports Guy said:
20 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

 

And those 3 years were recent and there is a lot of money pouring into the game, 2020 notwithstanding.

There was an article just a couple of days ago saying that the TV deal is being re-negotiated and will be much smaller. I think the game really needs to rethink it self, and the idea that any player on the planet is worth $300 million is wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Philip said:

There was an article just a couple of days ago saying that the TV deal is being re-negotiated and will be much smaller. I think the game really needs to rethink it self, and the idea that any player on the planet is worth $300 million is wrong.

Baseball has a number of fiscal problems.  I think the biggest is the free agent system as currently constructed gives the most money to declining, older players at the expense of the young and improving.  In soccer you have 22-year-olds making $25M a year, and no one really pays 35-year-olds top salaries.  In baseball 22-year-old stars are making $550k, while 35-year-olds with a fraction of the production make ten or 20 times a much.

The revenue has to go somewhere, I think to the players is as good an answer as to the $billionaire owners.  But more equal distribution would probably be better.  Certainly it's strange and unseemly that players in the same organization are making $1000 a month and $3M a month.

And I've said for a long time that I'm wary of the combination of cord-cutting and the very old demographics of baseball's fanbase.  Revenues haven't declined yet (at least pre-pandemic) but it's hard to see that continuing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • It seems like that the only possible way that the O’s (or most teams for that matter) can compete is by building an elite farm system.  Given how hard and how slow that process is, I wanted to ask the O’s experts on here a few simple question for discussion:   1. how long would you estimate that it takes for a team to go from a mediocre/poor farm system, to a system that has produced enough major league talent to win in the AL east?  Additionally, how long in your opinion does the pro club need to suck while building the farm. 2. is there a team that you would prefer that the O’s model their approach after?  Is it Tampa?  Toronto? St. Louis?  I think the Tampa model is the most brutally efficient, but I can’t see many people truly being happy with that model in the long haul (getting rid of good players while value is high, rarely spending a dollar in FA). 3. do you like the financial model of baseball as opposed to other professional leagues?  Baseball has always been my favorite sport, but it really seems to favor the larger market teams in the end.  Not that smaller market teams can’t compete, it’s just that every year it seems the larger market teams win.  I know there are some poor large market orgs, but I personally get disinterested when I see how imbalanced the competitive landscape can be at times.  
    • Same chance of getting you a championship in 2022.
    • o   lllllllllllllllllllllll. (vs. MARINERS, 12:35 PM)       llllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll        llllllllllllllllllllll.l (vs. MARINERS, 4:05 PM)     llllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll    o
    • Contracts like Davis really hurts the game overall more than it hurts the individual team. Typically teams that have a bad contract just pick up and move on from the player...meanwhile the fans hold a grudge towards the player. Baltimore is doing a disservice to the game by not releasing him and moving on.
    • Yikes. Here's what the O's gave up in 24 hrs.:     WAR, 1991 ff.     Finley        43.5     Harnisch    17.6     Schilling    80.2     Tettleton    17.9     Total lost: 159.2 Davis        0.2     Robinson    -0.6     Total gained: -0.4         Total, net: 159.6 10 yrs    16 WAR/yr.     16 yrs.    10 WAR/yr.    
    • My wife and I went to Sunday's game with another couple and had a great time. A couple observations: - Bottom line up front is that I'd very much encourage folks to go. We've been relatively cautious during Covid, but really at no point felt cramped or uncomfortable. Certainly some of that is that now most of the folks I was with were fully vaccinated, but there's plenty of space in between seats and really not that many people. Even coming into the stadium and in concession lines, people were generally respectful of distance and it was no issue. I'm sure, anecdotally, there will always be someone messing up, but it wasn't an issue for us. Just wanted to start with that context for those that harbor understandable apprehensions, acknowledging everyone has different circumstances/risk perceptions. - Definitely make sure you read the modified regulations before you go - the issue with purses and parking, as some folks noted above, are definitely present. You've just got to be aware of them and plan (my wife switched out her purse just before leaving the house, and my friend's wife had a borderline-sized purse that got waved through after a little negotiation). I can't speak for parking, as we just did a garage on Pratt. - Mobile ticketing and electronic payments were all fully in use, so do recommend just coming prepared. If you're comfortable with using them, it's no issue, but understand some people aren't as tech savvy. Just a pretty minor planning factor. - Regarding masks, most people were good about wearing them, though clearly some of that slipped when people were sitting at their seats. I did see a few times where ushers enforced the masking at your seat rule, but it didn't seem overly draconian (it wasn't that if your beer left your lips for more than two seconds and your mask wasn't up, ushers would descend on you). Those patrons I observed were mostly compliant when directed (except the stray Phillies fan who decided to be difficult). Although I know some folks aren't crazy about it, to be honest, I've been at work every day for the last year wearing a mask the entire time for 8+ hours, so I'm not especially sympathetic. Little bit of a pain, but won't kill ya for a couple hours. - As others have stated, most but not all concessions appeared to be open. Prices did feel a touch on the steep side, but I'd bet they're comparable to what they were in 2019. The O's clearly haven't moved to the Ravens modified pricing. - Lastly, the bar scene before the game was of course quite different than normal, but still very workable and pleasant. Pickles, Sliders, etc have taken over huge spaces in front of their buildings, with plentiful tables well-spaced out. We got to Sliders at maybe 11:45 before a 1 o'clock game on a Sunday, and we had no issue getting a table. Again, overall would recommend folks go, if you're comfortable. I'll tell you it was absolutely great to get back out there and do something normal after having been cooped up for so long.
    • One last thought. When the reserve clause died in court and all players could become free agents every year, the players union was smart and agreed to a service requirement. It was good for salaries and good for the sport to control supply/demand, even if it seemed like a giveaway by the players. If there was a non-performance clause built into free agent contracts that gave some level of relief to owners, it would benefit salaries and the sport. Small to mid size teams would have more ability to chase top talent because the affect of a bad contract would be less calamitous to their limited payroll means if it was discounted by some percentage for non-performance. Ask Scott Boras if he’d rather have three teams bidding for his client or six. Our very own Albert Belle contract made insuring contracts fairly cost prohibitive (though it kinda seems like we’re keeping Davis on the roster for some reason other than insanity). But that practice of insuring contracts showed that there’s more money to spend on players if you give owners some level of protection from disaster contracts like Davis. Owners used to pay huge amounts to insure contracts before they became cost prohibitive. So if it’s good for competitiveness by allowing smaller teams to be more aggressive, and it’s good for player salaries, and it’s good for owners by protecting their investments, by what principle is a player entitled to the full value of a contract that they have essentially defaulted on for non-performance? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...