Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
LookinUp

Heyman: Braves kicking tires on Mancini

Recommended Posts

I don't mind trading anyone in the right deal, but not if our primary motivation is to cut even more costs. Would really limit any value we get back. 

Either way, this offseason is telling me that the rebuild is longer, not shorter. If that's the case, maximize the value you can get on Mancini and Santander and move on. Will suck around here for a while longer though, IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I don't mind trading anyone in the right deal, but not if our primary motivation is to cut even more costs. Would really limit any value we get back. 

Either way, this offseason is telling me that the rebuild is longer, not shorter. If that's the case, maximize the value you can get on Mancini and Santander and move on. Will suck around here for a while longer though, IMO.

I think Elias tries put together a team that will win when Rutschman arrives in 2022.  No use to waste his years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, wildcard said:

I think Elias tries put together a team that will win when Rutschman arrives in 2022.  No use to waste his years.

Unless the plan is to keep AR in the minors until 2023.  😉

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, wildcard said:

I think Elias tries put together a team that will win when Rutschman arrives in 2022.  No use to waste his years.

That's been my hope, but any time you trade existing for future, you're kicking the can down the road...unless you're a team that supplements through free agency/trades, which we haven't been recently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CarrRun49 said:

You took a portion of my post to make your point.  I said I would move him if it included a guy like Waters (Their #2, Consensus top 50 overall).

Fair enough, I didn’t mean to misrepresent your position about what you’d trade him for, I was just reacting to the idea that the the Braves wouldn’t want to give up a top 10 prospect for him.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

That's been my hope, but any time you trade existing for future, you're kicking the can down the road...unless you're a team that supplements through free agency/trades, which we haven't been recently.

If Elias flips the switch in 2022, Cobb will be off the books.   Mancini probably traded by then.   Covid hopefully behind us which means fans in the stand and  more revenue to build with.   They will have the money getting a better quality FA  on short contracts until Grayson,  DL, Henderson and Westburg  arrive.     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

If Elias flips the switch in 2022, Cobb will be off the books.   Mancini probably traded by then.   Covid hopefully behind us which means fans in the stand and  more revenue to build with.   They will have the money getting a better quality FA  on short contracts until Grayson,  DL, Henderson and Westburg  arrive.     

We don't know that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

If Elias flips the switch in 2022, Cobb will be off the books.   Mancini probably traded by then.   Covid hopefully behind us which means fans in the stand and  more revenue to build with.   They will have the money getting a better quality FA  on short contracts until Grayson,  DL, Henderson and Westburg  arrive.     

This could all be true. Or we could be sold. Or we could be going bare bones until we're sold. Or we could be going bare bones into the future.

The money being talked about with MASN is massive. I'm not sure the Angelos people were collecting it in their piggy banks. I have no faith in them to spend, at all. at any point.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, LookinUp said:

This could all be true. Or we could be sold. Or we could be going bare bones until we're sold. Or we could be going bare bones into the future.

The money being talked about with MASN is massive. I'm not sure the Angelos people were collecting it in their piggy banks. I have no faith in them to spend, at all. at any point.

If you are talking about the lawsuits yes, they were collecting it.  They haven't been allowed to spend the disputed money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, LookinUp said:

This could all be true. Or we could be sold. Or we could be going bare bones until we're sold. Or we could be going bare bones into the future.

The money being talked about with MASN is massive. I'm not sure the Angelos people were collecting it in their piggy banks. I have no faith in them to spend, at all. at any point.

This is probably question for Frobby but didn't the Orioles put money in escrow prior to the court ruling?

Here is what a quick google search shows:  99m in Escrow.

https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/bs-sp-masn-orioles-nationals-20191125-jw64tzklg5hjdbunvt2tmhjlz4-story.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as not  spending because of a possible sale........A winning team is worth more than a losing one.  As players like Rutschman, Rodriguez, DL  Hall, Henderson, Westburg, Kjerstad, Bauman, Lowther, Diaz graduate to the majors putting the FA around then on short term contracts to make the team win adds value.   The rebuild is in motion.   Seem logical to me that the O's ownership does what is necessary to make them win when at the right time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

As far as not  spending because of a possible sale........A winning team is worth more than a losing one.  As players like Rutschman, Rodriguez, DL  Hall, Henderson, Westburg, Kjerstad, Bauman, Lowther, Diaz graduate to the majors putting the FA around then on short term contracts to make the team win adds value.   The rebuild is in motion.   Seem logical to me that the O's ownership does what is necessary to make them win when at the right time.

I don't think the team is going to be sold.  I think they are latched onto this franchise like an engorged tick.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Without doing something truly disturbing can fan opinion of the franchise get lower? 

You beat me to it Corn.  The team is in a rebuild that is seemingly taking forever with no real signs of being ready anytime soon.  They have gotten rid of the pre and post game shows and the "fan favorites" (or not) that sat behind those desks.  And truth be told, by the time we are ready to compete, I'm not sure a 30 year old Mancini would really make much difference at that point. 

So yeah, IF the deal is right, you make it.  BUT...you don't just give him away.  That would be ludicrous, which means the O's will do it.

In any event, the Orioles are still trotting out Chris Davis every game, so they are giving us fans what we want.  (sarcasm alert).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • It seems like that the only possible way that the O’s (or most teams for that matter) can compete is by building an elite farm system.  Given how hard and how slow that process is, I wanted to ask the O’s experts on here a few simple question for discussion:   1. how long would you estimate that it takes for a team to go from a mediocre/poor farm system, to a system that has produced enough major league talent to win in the AL east?  Additionally, how long in your opinion does the pro club need to suck while building the farm. 2. is there a team that you would prefer that the O’s model their approach after?  Is it Tampa?  Toronto? St. Louis?  I think the Tampa model is the most brutally efficient, but I can’t see many people truly being happy with that model in the long haul (getting rid of good players while value is high, rarely spending a dollar in FA). 3. do you like the financial model of baseball as opposed to other professional leagues?  Baseball has always been my favorite sport, but it really seems to favor the larger market teams in the end.  Not that smaller market teams can’t compete, it’s just that every year it seems the larger market teams win.  I know there are some poor large market orgs, but I personally get disinterested when I see how imbalanced the competitive landscape can be at times.  
    • Same chance of getting you a championship in 2022.
    • o   lllllllllllllllllllllll. (vs. MARINERS, 12:35 PM)       llllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll        llllllllllllllllllllll.l (vs. MARINERS, 4:05 PM)     llllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll    o
    • Contracts like Davis really hurts the game overall more than it hurts the individual team. Typically teams that have a bad contract just pick up and move on from the player...meanwhile the fans hold a grudge towards the player. Baltimore is doing a disservice to the game by not releasing him and moving on.
    • Yikes. Here's what the O's gave up in 24 hrs.:     WAR, 1991 ff.     Finley        43.5     Harnisch    17.6     Schilling    80.2     Tettleton    17.9     Total lost: 159.2 Davis        0.2     Robinson    -0.6     Total gained: -0.4         Total, net: 159.6 10 yrs    16 WAR/yr.     16 yrs.    10 WAR/yr.    
    • My wife and I went to Sunday's game with another couple and had a great time. A couple observations: - Bottom line up front is that I'd very much encourage folks to go. We've been relatively cautious during Covid, but really at no point felt cramped or uncomfortable. Certainly some of that is that now most of the folks I was with were fully vaccinated, but there's plenty of space in between seats and really not that many people. Even coming into the stadium and in concession lines, people were generally respectful of distance and it was no issue. I'm sure, anecdotally, there will always be someone messing up, but it wasn't an issue for us. Just wanted to start with that context for those that harbor understandable apprehensions, acknowledging everyone has different circumstances/risk perceptions. - Definitely make sure you read the modified regulations before you go - the issue with purses and parking, as some folks noted above, are definitely present. You've just got to be aware of them and plan (my wife switched out her purse just before leaving the house, and my friend's wife had a borderline-sized purse that got waved through after a little negotiation). I can't speak for parking, as we just did a garage on Pratt. - Mobile ticketing and electronic payments were all fully in use, so do recommend just coming prepared. If you're comfortable with using them, it's no issue, but understand some people aren't as tech savvy. Just a pretty minor planning factor. - Regarding masks, most people were good about wearing them, though clearly some of that slipped when people were sitting at their seats. I did see a few times where ushers enforced the masking at your seat rule, but it didn't seem overly draconian (it wasn't that if your beer left your lips for more than two seconds and your mask wasn't up, ushers would descend on you). Those patrons I observed were mostly compliant when directed (except the stray Phillies fan who decided to be difficult). Although I know some folks aren't crazy about it, to be honest, I've been at work every day for the last year wearing a mask the entire time for 8+ hours, so I'm not especially sympathetic. Little bit of a pain, but won't kill ya for a couple hours. - As others have stated, most but not all concessions appeared to be open. Prices did feel a touch on the steep side, but I'd bet they're comparable to what they were in 2019. The O's clearly haven't moved to the Ravens modified pricing. - Lastly, the bar scene before the game was of course quite different than normal, but still very workable and pleasant. Pickles, Sliders, etc have taken over huge spaces in front of their buildings, with plentiful tables well-spaced out. We got to Sliders at maybe 11:45 before a 1 o'clock game on a Sunday, and we had no issue getting a table. Again, overall would recommend folks go, if you're comfortable. I'll tell you it was absolutely great to get back out there and do something normal after having been cooped up for so long.
    • One last thought. When the reserve clause died in court and all players could become free agents every year, the players union was smart and agreed to a service requirement. It was good for salaries and good for the sport to control supply/demand, even if it seemed like a giveaway by the players. If there was a non-performance clause built into free agent contracts that gave some level of relief to owners, it would benefit salaries and the sport. Small to mid size teams would have more ability to chase top talent because the affect of a bad contract would be less calamitous to their limited payroll means if it was discounted by some percentage for non-performance. Ask Scott Boras if he’d rather have three teams bidding for his client or six. Our very own Albert Belle contract made insuring contracts fairly cost prohibitive (though it kinda seems like we’re keeping Davis on the roster for some reason other than insanity). But that practice of insuring contracts showed that there’s more money to spend on players if you give owners some level of protection from disaster contracts like Davis. Owners used to pay huge amounts to insure contracts before they became cost prohibitive. So if it’s good for competitiveness by allowing smaller teams to be more aggressive, and it’s good for player salaries, and it’s good for owners by protecting their investments, by what principle is a player entitled to the full value of a contract that they have essentially defaulted on for non-performance? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...