Jump to content
Frobby

Comparing the AL East Farm Systems - Fangraphs’ Take So Far

Recommended Posts

On 2/12/2021 at 7:12 AM, Can_of_corn said:

Sure would make trading Severino easier.

The main issue I had with the trade is that Pearce was hurt and I believe the O's knew he was hurt.  The Rays used him almost exclusively as a DH and never in the outfield.  The O's put him into the outfield and he's on the IL almost immediately.

You mean like the last night he played for us? Playing LF in a blowout loss to Boston?  Never did understand that from Buck and why the media never bothered to ask him about it.  

https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/BOS/BOS201609120.shtml


Perhaps he was already toast or would have hurt it the next game. I think he would have been a nice bat to have for the WC game in Toronto.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/28/2021 at 10:06 AM, LookinUp said:

I've read that Tampa has the strongest system people have ever seen. I do forget who wrote that, but he's been in baseball for decades. 

Not sure if that would hold under scrutiny, but even if it doesn't, if you're even mentioned as the best system ever you must be stacked.

Kiley McDaniel said Wednesday that Tampa could lose/drop Wander from their list and still have the number 1 system in all of the land. Crazy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Frobby said:

Has to be an error on Longenhagen’s part.    Overall, I found his list a bit weird.    He isn’t real high on our system, by these numbers.    

It seems like all of Fangraphs is off on Akin for some reason. Meg Rowley chimed in the comments, responding to commenters making this point, by linking the Fangraphs list of graduated prospects, which doesn't really prove anything (i.e., A makes a claim then cites A's own prior statements as evidence).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, scarey1999 said:

Kiley McDaniel said Wednesday that Tampa could lose/drop Wander from their list and still have the number 1 system in all of the land. Crazy. 

That is truly incredible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LookinUp said:

That is truly incredible.

They are better than the late 50's Royals when by reputation Kansas City was the Yankees farm club in the American League, but they somewhat serve the other 29 clubs in this regard.   The Peak Franco Teams probably should outshine even the Peak Rutschman Teams here, but I think I'm more worried about being better than the Blue Jays than the Rays four years out.

I am curious to see if they can keep their Stable such an October force after 162 not 60.   They flat beat peak Gerrit Cole with that last fall, and they'll certainly be able to acquire any blossoming Nick Anderson (Tanner Scott?) they want in July.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, OrioleDog said:

They are better than the late 50's Royals when by reputation Kansas City was the Yankees farm club in the American League,

The Athletics were in Kansas City at that time.  The Royals were not yet in existence.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Fangraphs assigns a dollar value to each prospect ranking, e.g. a FV 65 batter (Rutschman) is worth $112 mm whereas a FV 55 pitcher (Rodriguez) is worth $34 mm.   In this way, you can add the values of each player they rank and come up with a team total.   Here’s the tally in the AL East:

TBR $558 mm (62 players)

BAL $230.5 mm (45)

TOR $209 mm (39)

NYY $172 mm (48)

BOS $124 mm (47)

One caveat: when Fangraphs published their valuations for each grade, there were no 80 FV players or 70 FV pitchers.    So, I really don’t know what dollar value they put on 80 FV Wander Franco.   I pegged it at $175 mm.   Even without Franco the Rays’ system would be worth $383 mm by Fangraphs’ estimation.    

You can see by the above that quantity is good, but quality also matters.   Hence Toronto has the third most valuable system in the AL East even though they have the lowest number of rated prospects.    
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

TBR $558 mm (62 players)

I look forward to Nashville and Team 32 drawing heavily from this pool if we get expansion in a few years!   Believe I saw Longenhagen in his chat a few days ago questioned about Akin's absence giving an answer saying he thought it was a goof, but don't know if he's edited yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/28/2021 at 11:27 AM, Can_of_corn said:

Did they have 14 consecutive losing seasons?

We all know the Orioles were inept from top to bottom for a long time. Not a secret nor is it under debate. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, LocoChris said:

We all know the Orioles were inept from top to bottom for a long time. Not a secret nor is it under debate. 

I was responding to someone comparing them to an expansion franchise initial years as a team.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Overall, Fangraphs has evaluated 12 farm systems so far, and the Orioles rank 5th in that group:

TBR $558 mm (62 players)

MIN $314.5 mm (39)

PIT $263.5 mm (51)

CWS $232 mm (34)

BAL $230.5 mm (45)

If Akin (45 FV P = $4 mm) is added in, we squeak past the White Sox.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

MIN $314.5 mm (39)

I probably wouldn't have guessed that one.   Royce Lewis did just take a significant ding.

The Twins are obviously doing lots of stuff right but I feel like our path past them is a Cruz/Donaldson tapering off and them simply not being able to afford the very good team they've constructed.

I think I think by 2023 we're almost as likely to have Berrios/Buxton/Rogers as they are

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

I probably wouldn't have guessed that one.   Royce Lewis did just take a significant ding.

The Twins are obviously doing lots of stuff right but I feel like our path past them is a Cruz/Donaldson tapering off and them simply not being able to afford the very good team they've constructed.

I think I think by 2023 we're almost as likely to have Berrios/Buxton/Rogers as they are

Minnesota doesn’t have a large number of ranked prospects, but at the top they have two 60’s, a 55 and four 50’s.   We have a 65, a 55 and three 50’s.

Of course, this is all in Longenhagen’s opinion.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 103 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Well, the Orioles got off to a terrible start in what is hopefully Elias' final tankathon season. They owned the 28th pick in the 2022 MLB draft upon leaving Boston. However, they've now rallied up to the number four pick, just two games behind Colorado. The Elijah Green sweepstakes are under way!
    • Of course I knew him but I never watched him. I thought those cartoons were stupid, even as an 8-year old. Tom and Jerry too. But the Warner bros gang were brilliant.  i was very fond of Mighty Mouse, too. The artwork was stunning.
    • Dont hold you're breath. 
    • o   Young man, you're no Walter Johnson.   o
    • I think a fan with a certain bit of refinement should understand that prospect rankings are not definitive statements on the health of a player development system.  What the O's need to be able to do to win consistently at the ML level is find and develop players better than their peers.  Taking Rutchsman doesn't actually resolve that issue.  Whiffing on 1-2 doesn't resolve that issue.  Neither does losing 100 games a year.  That issue is resolved in improving the O's processes in finding and developing amateur talent.  So if you want to criticize Elias or the rebuild, criticize that.  The fact that the O's stink in 2021, or 2020, or 2023, was predestined several years before it happened. You hit the O's biggest organizational failure on the head: The failure to develop quality pitching.  I've said this before and I'll say it again: The reason so many highly ranked minor league arms fail here and go on to do better elsewhere in some cases is because pitching for the O's is the most difficult pitching environment in the big leagues, and I don't think it is close.  Based on who and where you pitch, this is easily the worst place to pitch in the major leagues, other than maybe Colorado. So if Elias doesn't solve that particular riddle, he is mostly likely to fail.  I don't think he's infallible.  It's very possible he does fail.  But I'm not going to get up in arms about the O's being shit 2 and a half years into what I takes twice that time to favorably construct.
    • Those high rankings were almost solely the result of picking in the top 5 AND some good trading by MacPhail- who actually had a ML asset or two when he arrived unlike Elias. It was not a testament to the Orioles ability to find and develop players though. Before we go down this road, I think I should clearly state we don't seem to disagree.  I said 3-5 years.  You presented the Mariners as an example of doing it in 3 years.  Even if I accept the premise that they did what you say, that fits into the window I provided.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...