Jump to content
hutchead

2021 MLB Mock Draft

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Thanks! That bio says he is known as a tough negotiator. It is always interesting to see how these shake out. You have to believe Lawlar has a bottom line number in mind. He is generally seen as a top 5 pick, but the number 1-2 talent. I tend to doubt that Elias will pay him slot, but if he falls to #5, he should.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This draft is all over the place.  Anyone who thinks they have a bead on it is full of ****.  There's no clear consensus top three, let alone a consensus #1.  All the mocks look really different, save for some teams targeting shortstops, but that's not a stretch when 3 of the top prospects are at SS.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

This draft is all over the place.  Anyone who thinks they have a bead on it is full of ****.  There's no clear consensus top three, let alone a consensus #1.  All the mocks look really different, save for some teams targeting shortstops, but that's not a stretch when 3 of the top prospects are at SS.

But don’t worry, the “draft experts” on this site will bash the Os for a pick about a player they have never seen or even heard before the rankings came out.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good article here:

https://www.mlb.com/news/baltimore-orioles-2021-draft-preview

Callis: This is not a good Draft for college bats, especially at the top. There is [Louisville catcher] Henry Davis, and then there is a dropoff. But there are four really good high school shortstops. At least a couple of those guys could be available at No. 5. And there's two really good college pitchers in [Vanderbilt righties] Jack Leiter and Kumar Rocker. And there's an excellent high school pitcher in [Oklahoma prep righty] Jackson Jobe. … While I don't think it's a deep Draft, I think the Orioles are in a good spot at pick No. 5, where they're going to get a really good player. … Unless they [make some] kind of deal or something, which has been rumored, they're going to get a player who might be on pretty equal footing with the guy who does go number one.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 7Mo said:

Good article here:

https://www.mlb.com/news/baltimore-orioles-2021-draft-preview

Callis: This is not a good Draft for college bats, especially at the top. There is [Louisville catcher] Henry Davis, and then there is a dropoff. But there are four really good high school shortstops. At least a couple of those guys could be available at No. 5. And there's two really good college pitchers in [Vanderbilt righties] Jack Leiter and Kumar Rocker. And there's an excellent high school pitcher in [Oklahoma prep righty] Jackson Jobe. … While I don't think it's a deep Draft, I think the Orioles are in a good spot at pick No. 5, where they're going to get a really good player. … Unless they [make some] kind of deal or something, which has been rumored, they're going to get a player who might be on pretty equal footing with the guy who does go number one.

If the Orioles go the cheap route, it would really be disappointing. I think Rocker or Leiter would give the O's a guy that would be on pace with Hall and Rodriguez for very good top 3 of the rotation. I don't expect Lawlar or Mayer to fall, but passing on that kind of talent at #5 would be insane. 

I think the next tier of HS SS in Watson and House would make a strong case to be 1.1 in a lot of other years. 

This is a big draft for the Os and they need to nail this top pick here, especially after the unfortunate circumstances with Kjerstad. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, baltimoreO's22 said:

If the Orioles go the cheap route, it would really be disappointing. I think Rocker or Leiter would give the O's a guy that would be on pace with Hall and Rodriguez for very good top 3 of the rotation. I don't expect Lawlar or Mayer to fall, but passing on that kind of talent at #5 would be insane. 

I think the next tier of HS SS in Watson and House would make a strong case to be 1.1 in a lot of other years. 

This is a big draft for the Os and they need to nail this top pick here, especially after the unfortunate circumstances with Kjerstad. 

If there is any consensus right now, I think it's that Mayer goes #1 and Leiter doesn't last past #4. Several seem to think Boston will take him if he's still on the board.

That leaves Lawlar, Watson, Davis, Rocker, House and Jobe, in that order, from MLB prospect rankings. 4 of those 6 will be available at pick #5.

If Lawlar says he will only sign for 1-1 slot money, that's roughly $2.2M above the #5 slot value. It would be interesting to see how the O's evaluated these 6 guys. Do they see Lawlar as that much better than the others? Personally, I really like Watson, Davis and Jobe. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

If there is any consensus right now, I think it's that Mayer goes #1 and Leiter doesn't last past #4. Several seem to think Boston will take him if he's still on the board.

That leaves Lawlar, Watson, Davis, Rocker, House and Jobe, in that order, from MLB prospect rankings. 4 of those 6 will be available at pick #5.

If Lawlar says he will only sign for 1-1 slot money, that's roughly $2.2M above the #5 slot value. It would be interesting to see how the O's evaluated these 6 guys. Do they see Lawlar as that much better than the others? Personally, I really like Watson, Davis and Jobe. 

Lawlar wouldn't be a draft eligible sophomore, so I'm not quite so sure he would demand 1-1 money or else go to college. I think the Orioles could get him for 7M, meaning they'd need to be roughly 800k under the rest of the way, which is doable. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, baltimoreO's22 said:

Lawlar wouldn't be a draft eligible sophomore, so I'm not quite so sure he would demand 1-1 money or else go to college. I think the Orioles could get him for 7M, meaning they'd need to be roughly 800k under the rest of the way, which is doable. 

Seems reasonable. Austin Martin signed for $7M as the 5th pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, baltimoreO's22 said:

If the Orioles go the cheap route, it would really be disappointing. I think Rocker or Leiter would give the O's a guy that would be on pace with Hall and Rodriguez for very good top 3 of the rotation. I don't expect Lawlar or Mayer to fall, but passing on that kind of talent at #5 would be insane. 

I think the next tier of HS SS in Watson and House would make a strong case to be 1.1 in a lot of other years. 

This is a big draft for the Os and they need to nail this top pick here, especially after the unfortunate circumstances with Kjerstad. 

I don’t think you should think of the underslot strategy as the “cheap route.”   They are going to spend virtually all of the $11.8 mm they are permitted to spend.   It’s just a matter of who they spend it on.   

(Waiting for Can_of_corn to swoop in and point out that the O’s had the most unspent allotment of any team last year, which was something like $135 k out of $13.9 mm.)

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 7Mo said:

If there is any consensus right now, I think it's that Mayer goes #1 and Leiter doesn't last past #4. Several seem to think Boston will take him if he's still on the board.

That leaves Lawlar, Watson, Davis, Rocker, House and Jobe, in that order, from MLB prospect rankings. 4 of those 6 will be available at pick #5.

If Lawlar says he will only sign for 1-1 slot money, that's roughly $2.2M above the #5 slot value. It would be interesting to see how the O's evaluated these 6 guys. Do they see Lawlar as that much better than the others? Personally, I really like Watson, Davis and Jobe. 

A well reasoned take. Have you looked at the crouch, leg kick and huge upper cut swing of Davis? Maybe the selecting teams and scouts feel that a swing change is in order, or maybe they like his launch angle and excellent power. I notice his hands at load are pretty far away from his body and I think he’ll have issues with pitchers busting him inside. I have heard mixed reviews about his defense. I have honestly not seen enough to say either way. The videos of his swing concern me, and the bat is why he is among the top prospects. I worry that he is up there simply because he is the most productive current college bat. There will be plenty of unpolished toolsy college guys in rounds 2-4 that may end up more valuable in a few years from now. Guys like Isaiah Thomas of Vandy and Robby Martin of FSU. 

Of Lawlar really wants 1-1 money, hard pass. See you in two years, kid. They would have to save about $2 million elsewhere in the top 10 rounds. You would have to think he is the next AROD or Griffey, Jr..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

A well reasoned take. Have you looked at the crouch, leg kick and huge upper cut swing of Davis? Maybe the selecting teams and scouts feel that a swing change is in order, or maybe they like his launch angle and excellent power. I notice his hands at load are pretty far away from his body and I think he’ll have issues with pitchers busting him inside. I have heard mixed reviews about his defense. I have honestly not seen enough to say either way. The videos of his swing concern me, and the bat is why he is among the top prospects. I worry that he is up there simply because he is the most productive current college bat. There will be plenty of unpolished toolsy college guys in rounds 2-4 that may end up more valuable in a few years from now. Guys like Isaiah Thomas of Vandy and Robby Martin of FSU. 

Of Lawlar really wants 1-1 money, hard pass. See you in two years, kid. They would have to save about $2 million elsewhere in the top 10 rounds. You would have to think he is the next AROD or Griffey, Jr..

Good post.

So, of the 6 most likely to be available, Lawlar might price himself out of reasonable range, Watson is 5'9" and likely a second baseman, Davis has the swing issues you outlined, House probably needs some swing adjustments and likely moves to third, and Jobe sounds outstanding but remains a HS RHP. I left out Rocker.

I understand the uproar coming from this board if they wind up picking Frelick, Cowser or Bachman, but it might not be the worst idea this year. Of course, Elias and company have infinitely more information available to them than I do so who knows.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, 7Mo said:

If there is any consensus right now, I think it's that Mayer goes #1 and Leiter doesn't last past #4. Several seem to think Boston will take him if he's still on the board.

That leaves Lawlar, Watson, Davis, Rocker, House and Jobe, in that order, from MLB prospect rankings. 4 of those 6 will be available at pick #5.

If Lawlar says he will only sign for 1-1 slot money, that's roughly $2.2M above the #5 slot value. It would be interesting to see how the O's evaluated these 6 guys. Do they see Lawlar as that much better than the others? Personally, I really like Watson, Davis and Jobe. 

Just wondering on Leiter... Is there any speculation that he might skip the minors?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 7Mo said:

Good post.

So, of the 6 most likely to be available, Lawlar might price himself out of reasonable range, Watson is 5'9" and likely a second baseman, Davis has the swing issues you outlined, House probably needs some swing adjustments and likely moves to third, and Jobe sounds outstanding but remains a HS RHP. I left out Rocker.

I understand the uproar coming from this board if they wind up picking Frelick, Cowser or Bachman, but it might not be the worst idea this year. Of course, Elias and company have infinitely more information available to them than I do so who knows.

Yes to all you wrote there. That is why the Ford under slot makes some sense, really. A very talented kid, strong and fast. Seems a lot like a young Austin Martin, except he can play catcher. A similar tool profile. A very interesting situation. It should really tell us more about the sophistication of Elias’ process. Some of the more popular publication picks are safe, and maybe a little lazy. When you take an undervalued kid and hang it all out there with the faith that you can coach that young fella up to be a star, at a lower cost. Man, that is conviction. We’ll see. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

Yes to all you wrote there. That is why the Ford under slot makes some sense, really. A very talented kid, strong and fast. Seems a lot like a young Austin Martin, except he can play catcher. A similar tool profile. A very interesting situation. It should really tell us more about the sophistication of Elias’ process. Some of the more popular publication picks are safe, and maybe a little lazy. When you take an undervalued kid and hang it all out there with the faith that you can coach that young fella up to be a star, at a lower cost. Man, that is conviction. We’ll see. 

Some might say ego.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Minor League Depth Chart

2021 Prospect Power Rankings

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Oh, I don’t agree with it, but after years of having arguments about “sunk costs” I’m left without any other impression.  In my mind, including Davis when the team was horrible, and now Severino or Franco, these guys are taking the roster spot of someone more deserving. Not always, but there’s a pretty good case for someone to take any of those spots.
    • Per MLB rules online, the ball is live if it is “unintentional interference.”
    • He was emptying the tank there.   The first inning or two, he was slower.   The first touch of 94-95 I noticed wasn't until a few innings along, on a 2 out 2 strike pitch.   But he really seemed to pick up steam in the middle. Hartford seemed kind of terrible, but at least he held serve, if not a little more.   On the Either/Or, I'd easily pick Rodriguez still.
    • It was Roth followed by Roth tonight in Delmarva.   I don’t recall that happening before with them.  
    • For the second time in a couple of weeks, an Orioles ball boy touched a fair ball that bounced in his direction tonight and the ball was ruled dead when he touched it. Unlike the other incident, this ball literally came right at the ball boy’s chair. He barely had to move his glove to a spot maybe 18 inches under his lap.  He was mightily embarrassed when he realized his mistake.   The other incident was more egregious, though neither was good and the the ball boy/girl supervisor really needs to call a meeting and let all these kids know it’s an unacceptable mistake.  (I saw another ball boy/girl do this in a recent O’s road game, I believe). That said, here’s my question.  Assume the kid jumps from his chair and the ball either rattles around under the chair or ricochets off one of the legs and back out.   In either instance, Is that a live ball? I think the kid is supposed to try to move the chair to avoid those scenarios, but I’m still curious what the ruling would  be.   By the way, a few innings later the same ball boy did a nice job of snagging a foul ball that had bounced off the side wall and was about to go into the field of play.   The fans sitting over there cheered him, something I doubt they would have done normally but they did it to, quite literally, “cheer him up” after his prior mistake.  Classy move.  
    • I don’t mind it much when the TV guys do it, since you can see the action.  It bothers me more on radio, where you’re dependent on the announcers to know what’s going on.   A skilled announcer can do an interview between the action but describe the game decently at the same time, and minimize the spillover.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...