Jump to content
wildcard

What if Lowther is ready?

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I disagree..people talk all the time about NEEDING to see DOMINANCE to bring up players.  That’s just absurd unless their definition of dominance is actually not the definition of dominance.

 

You can be a useful piece on the ML team without having put up dominant numbers in the minors.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I disagree..people talk all the time about NEEDING to see DOMINANCE to bring up players.  That’s just absurd unless their definition of dominance is actually not the definition of dominance.

 

I agree with you that people use the term in a loose way.  I disagree that they expect six or seven straight no-hitters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Start Lowther at triple A . I want Os management to do this right unlike the Calvary. If he’s dominating there then bring him up but I am not about rushing prospects anymore if we are banking on these guys . Same with Rustchman. I wouldn’t be upset if he DOES NOT make his debut this year .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, ofan239 said:

Start Lowther at triple A . I want Os management to do this right unlike the Calvary. If he’s dominating there then bring him up but I am not about rushing prospects anymore if we are banking on these guys . Same with Rustchman. I wouldn’t be upset if he DOES NOT make his debut this year .

We didn’t rush anyone before.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I disagree..people talk all the time about NEEDING to see DOMINANCE to bring up players.  That’s just absurd unless their definition of dominance is actually not the definition of dominance.

 

Here’s my rough definition of dominant:

- ERA under 3.00 or more than a run lower than league average, whichever is lower.

- K/9 at least 20% above league average. 

- H/IP of 0.9 or less (8.1 H/9)

- K/BB of 3.0 or higher

A pitcher can do a lot less than that and still be very deserving of promotion, but that’s what I’d call dominant.  

It’s a tough standard.   Zac Lowther was EL pitcher of the year and yet met only one of those four criteria (6.2 H/9).    He came close on ERA (2.55 was 0.98 below league average).    His K/9 and K/BB did not meet the standard.   

Only eight major league pitchers met my standard last year: Bieber, Bauer, Darvish, Lamet, DeGrom, Maeda, Cole and Carrasco.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Here’s my rough definition of dominant:

- ERA under 3.00 or more than a run lower than league average, whichever is lower.

- K/9 at least 20% above league average. 

- H/IP of 0.9 or less (8.1 H/9)

- K/BB of 3.0 or higher

A pitcher can do a lot less than that and still be very deserving of promotion, but that’s what I’d call dominant.  

It’s a tough standard.   Zac Lowther was EL pitcher of the year and yet met only one of those four criteria (6.2 H/9).    He came close on ERA (2.55 was 0.98 below league average).    His K/9 and K/BB did not meet the standard.   

Only eight major league pitchers met my standard last year: Bieber, Bauer, Darvish, Lamet, DeGrom, Maeda, Cole and Carrasco.   

That all seems reasonable to me..and it’s also why it’s crazy to say a player must dominate to get a promotion.  My guess is if that was the criteria, we would rarely see promotions and players would never get out of the minors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

We didn’t rush anyone before.  

I'd say Gausman was rushed.  I don't know if it did any lasting damage to him but I do think they should have let him get some more time in the minors to work on his craft.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

That all seems reasonable to me..and it’s also why it’s crazy to say a player must dominate to get a promotion.  My guess is if that was the criteria, we would rarely see promotions and players would never get out of the minors.

It’s just one of those expressions people toss out a bit carelessly.  I don’t think anyone would suggest that promotions be limited to those who meet my definition.   But the converse probably is true: if a pitcher has had 10+ starts and is meeting those criteria, you have to question why he’s not getting promoted.  
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, on reflection I think my 8.1 H/9 criterion for dominance was too easy.    I’d though major league average was around 9.0, but it’s actually 8.4.   Eastern League was 8.0 in 2019.    

So make it 7.5.   
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'd say Gausman was rushed.  I don't know if it did any lasting damage to him but I do think they should have let him get some more time in the minors to work on his craft.

I don’t think he was rushed.  He was an advanced college arm.  His 2014 season, the year after he was initially called up and his first relatively full season in the majors saw him have a 3.57 ERA.  His ERA was 4.25 the next year but his K rate and BB rates was improved.

Now, where they did mess up is how they kept jerking him around, yo yo’ing him up and down, etc...I would have been fine to leave him down all of 2013 and he did need to refine his secondary pitches but I think there is a difference between needing more work and rushing.

To me, rushing would have been putting DL Hall in the majors in 2019. 
 

I am just not sure I believe in the concept of rushing a highly drafted college player.  They should be ready quickly if they were a top pick.

HS players are different, especially pitchers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He was a sophomore draftee that had fewer than 100 innings in the minors before his first promotion and had no clear third pitch.  That would have been fine if he was a reliever,

That’s fine but as you like to say, you can develop in the majors too.

He was trusted with over 110 innings in 2014, with a team that was arguably the best in baseball.  I think he was fine.

Again, I wouldn’t have had an issue with him staying down all of 2013 and I honestly would have preferred that over the jerking him around that they did but I still wouldn’t define that as rushing him.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Minor League Depth Chart

2021 Prospect Power Rankings

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • LOL sounds like a former employee still on the dole!  😁
    • I forgot about the bad bunt - 2x on base is awesome and scary.  Didn't Dylan Bundy pull a hammy a few years back going from first to third?  Zack Britton hit one out if I recall.  Dang!  I keep digressing.  I might get besmirched again at this late date!  @Ruzious
    • I was there on Lavor Day.  Looked great to me. Even better than Nats Park which lacked character. 
    • It affected guys like Koufax, Kaline and Killebrew.   Overall about 60 players over 19 years.  An explanation and a list here: https://www.baseball-almanac.com/legendary/Bonus_Babies.shtml
    • Great.   They have done a good job of keeping up on things.
    • Is it showing real signs of age and does it need significant repairs? It still looks good on TV, but so doesn’t Fenway and I’ve heard stories about that place.    I ask because even though Camden isn’t ancient, it’s not new anymore. 
    • Man this thread has turned into something. I won't bother quoting everyone but wanted to share a few reactions I had while reading. 1. Matt Boyd 2018-2019 is not a worthy comparison of John Means because John Means is a much better pitcher. Any trade discussion should start from the fact that we would be trading a 28 year old cheap, controllably pitcher who is approaching 350 innings now at nearly LESS than 1.00 WHIP, ERA less than 3.60. And yes the Bedard haul is a reasonable comparison. To hell with the peripherals that don't like him. Watch him pitch. FIP says that John Means and Matt Harvey have been the same pitcher this year. He has excellent control/command with a knack for avoiding hard contact. Why is a .230 BABIP concerning when his career BABIP is .244? So any trade should be valuing him at the nearly top of the rotation talent he has been, and the not the back of the rotation the advanced metrics say he is. If not? Sorry. 2. Let's put to rest any discussion Austin Hays is a platoon player. He's our 2nd best position player. There's no concerning career splits and any O's fan should want him in the outfield everyday.  3. Ryan McKenna has played his role well for a rookie and I've become more fond of him as the season went along. Short sample size but his 11 homers and 7 steals in 27 games at Norfolk were eye opening. He's in excellent shape, hustles, is a fantastic defender, has displayed a good batting eye, and it's way too early to give up on his bat.  4. Regarding Trey Mancini and Anthony Santander's trade value, I'm not sure there is much. We are looking at a 0.9 and 0.3 B-Ref WAR players. Decent bats who have seen better days and don't provide much else. Renato Nunez provided 2.6 WAR and a 107 OPS+ in less than 2 normal seasons and was DFA'd in his first arbitration year. I want both Mancini and Santander back but let's not kid ourselves that we would be getting back a high quality package for these players.  5. I think people tend to gloss over how beneficial it is to have real major league pitchers in the majors while our prospects are developing. I'm all for tanking and not spending everything we have for a 70 win team, but without pitchers like John Means, games turn into exhaustive bullpen games, pitchers get overworked, and your prospects get yanked around or rushed. So Yeah I don't think John Means is not leading us to contention in 2022 but he is still a valuable part of the rebuild. He is not wasted value/talent whatsoever.  6. The "terrible in 2022, .500 team in 2023, and contender in 2024" timelines are pretty ridiculous. Nobody knows when it will all come together. But I do believe success breeds success, and things tend to work out or not work out in clusters. And outside additions will come. We do not have to and will not home grow this entire team. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...