Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
wildcard

What if Lowther is ready?

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I disagree..people talk all the time about NEEDING to see DOMINANCE to bring up players.  That’s just absurd unless their definition of dominance is actually not the definition of dominance.

 

You can be a useful piece on the ML team without having put up dominant numbers in the minors.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I disagree..people talk all the time about NEEDING to see DOMINANCE to bring up players.  That’s just absurd unless their definition of dominance is actually not the definition of dominance.

 

I agree with you that people use the term in a loose way.  I disagree that they expect six or seven straight no-hitters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want the best 5 guys in the mound. If Lowther and Baumann are better than Felix and Harvey I’m going to be annoyed if they get sent down anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, NCRaven said:

I agree with you that people use the term in a loose way.  I disagree that they expect six or seven straight no-hitters.

I would hope you understand the point there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Start Lowther at triple A . I want Os management to do this right unlike the Calvary. If he’s dominating there then bring him up but I am not about rushing prospects anymore if we are banking on these guys . Same with Rustchman. I wouldn’t be upset if he DOES NOT make his debut this year .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, ofan239 said:

Start Lowther at triple A . I want Os management to do this right unlike the Calvary. If he’s dominating there then bring him up but I am not about rushing prospects anymore if we are banking on these guys . Same with Rustchman. I wouldn’t be upset if he DOES NOT make his debut this year .

We didn’t rush anyone before.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I disagree..people talk all the time about NEEDING to see DOMINANCE to bring up players.  That’s just absurd unless their definition of dominance is actually not the definition of dominance.

 

Here’s my rough definition of dominant:

- ERA under 3.00 or more than a run lower than league average, whichever is lower.

- K/9 at least 20% above league average. 

- H/IP of 0.9 or less (8.1 H/9)

- K/BB of 3.0 or higher

A pitcher can do a lot less than that and still be very deserving of promotion, but that’s what I’d call dominant.  

It’s a tough standard.   Zac Lowther was EL pitcher of the year and yet met only one of those four criteria (6.2 H/9).    He came close on ERA (2.55 was 0.98 below league average).    His K/9 and K/BB did not meet the standard.   

Only eight major league pitchers met my standard last year: Bieber, Bauer, Darvish, Lamet, DeGrom, Maeda, Cole and Carrasco.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Here’s my rough definition of dominant:

- ERA under 3.00 or more than a run lower than league average, whichever is lower.

- K/9 at least 20% above league average. 

- H/IP of 0.9 or less (8.1 H/9)

- K/BB of 3.0 or higher

A pitcher can do a lot less than that and still be very deserving of promotion, but that’s what I’d call dominant.  

It’s a tough standard.   Zac Lowther was EL pitcher of the year and yet met only one of those four criteria (6.2 H/9).    He came close on ERA (2.55 was 0.98 below league average).    His K/9 and K/BB did not meet the standard.   

Only eight major league pitchers met my standard last year: Bieber, Bauer, Darvish, Lamet, DeGrom, Maeda, Cole and Carrasco.   

That all seems reasonable to me..and it’s also why it’s crazy to say a player must dominate to get a promotion.  My guess is if that was the criteria, we would rarely see promotions and players would never get out of the minors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

We didn’t rush anyone before.  

I'd say Gausman was rushed.  I don't know if it did any lasting damage to him but I do think they should have let him get some more time in the minors to work on his craft.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

That all seems reasonable to me..and it’s also why it’s crazy to say a player must dominate to get a promotion.  My guess is if that was the criteria, we would rarely see promotions and players would never get out of the minors.

It’s just one of those expressions people toss out a bit carelessly.  I don’t think anyone would suggest that promotions be limited to those who meet my definition.   But the converse probably is true: if a pitcher has had 10+ starts and is meeting those criteria, you have to question why he’s not getting promoted.  
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, on reflection I think my 8.1 H/9 criterion for dominance was too easy.    I’d though major league average was around 9.0, but it’s actually 8.4.   Eastern League was 8.0 in 2019.    

So make it 7.5.   
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'd say Gausman was rushed.  I don't know if it did any lasting damage to him but I do think they should have let him get some more time in the minors to work on his craft.

I don’t think he was rushed.  He was an advanced college arm.  His 2014 season, the year after he was initially called up and his first relatively full season in the majors saw him have a 3.57 ERA.  His ERA was 4.25 the next year but his K rate and BB rates was improved.

Now, where they did mess up is how they kept jerking him around, yo yo’ing him up and down, etc...I would have been fine to leave him down all of 2013 and he did need to refine his secondary pitches but I think there is a difference between needing more work and rushing.

To me, rushing would have been putting DL Hall in the majors in 2019. 
 

I am just not sure I believe in the concept of rushing a highly drafted college player.  They should be ready quickly if they were a top pick.

HS players are different, especially pitchers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He was a sophomore draftee that had fewer than 100 innings in the minors before his first promotion and had no clear third pitch.  That would have been fine if he was a reliever,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He was a sophomore draftee that had fewer than 100 innings in the minors before his first promotion and had no clear third pitch.  That would have been fine if he was a reliever,

That’s fine but as you like to say, you can develop in the majors too.

He was trusted with over 110 innings in 2014, with a team that was arguably the best in baseball.  I think he was fine.

Again, I wouldn’t have had an issue with him staying down all of 2013 and I honestly would have preferred that over the jerking him around that they did but I still wouldn’t define that as rushing him.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I just don’t get how we can send down our MVP, Valaika, and still expect to win games?!?!
    • No of course you don’t...but he believes himself to be.  It’s part of the whole thing you were talking about.
    • I actually found it quite entertaining. To each their own I guess.
    • It is widely expected that DJ Stewart will be activated for the Injured List today.  What does you bring and how can he help? He brings experience.  In DJ's pro career he has played  527 games in the outfield corners.   Ryan Mountcastle has played 55  games in the outfield in the minors and the majors.   DJ's  outfield experience has not always been perfect.  He is known for some spectacular misplays.   But he has average speed,  average range and an average left fielder's arm.   HIs overall outfield defensive game should be a improvement over Mountcastle and should move Ryan to DH more often than not if Brandon Hyde takes advantage for the assets he is given. Stewart offensive game is a low average with power and the ability to work a walk that has netted him a 224/334/433/768 split in 301 major league plate appearances.   His left-handed bat should be additive to the O's lineup.    How long will you stay may depend on how he does and whether Austin Hays hamstring heals fast or lingers.   If Stewart does well he will give the Hyde a reason to go from 14 pitchers to 13 when Hays returns.    Injuries have been a problem for Stewart but over the last 3 years he has played in 77% of his teams game.  That is about the same as Santander. Much better than Hays 59% or Diaz 64% but not close to Mullins 93%. Good Luck DJ.  I hope you are at the top of your game because the O's could use that player.    
    • Personally I find it more constructive and rewarding to riff on the idea of a developmental system and service time manipulation for announcers than I do wildly speculating about what the guy who says names out loud could have possibly done to get himself escorted out of the gates.
    • My supposition is he did something the team found unacceptable very recently.   I’m sure they didn’t like the timing at all.  
    • Let’s look at the six main culprits so far: 1.   Ryan Mountcastle, 11 K’s in 30 PA (36.7%).  21.4% last year. 2.  Trey Mancini, 11 K’s in 31 PA (35.5%).  21.1% in 2019. 3.   Rio Ruiz, 10 K’s in 25 PA (40%). 22.5% last year. 4.  Freddy Galvis, 10 K’s in 29 PA (34.5%).   18.9% last year,. 5.  Pedro Severino, 9 K’s in 23 PA (39.1%).    22.5% last year. 6.  Anthony Santander, 9 K’s in 27 PA (33.3%).   15.2% last year. I’m fairly sure all those are coming down substantially.   The one that worries me most is Mancini, for obvious reasons.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...