Jump to content
Tony-OH

Colton Cowser 2021

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He was expected to be pricey, slots weren't really a thing, not like they are now.

I don't know how close the rankings were but rumor has it the Rays (first pick in the draft) had him at the top of their board.

Having a catcher would not stop me from taking a catcher if I thought he was the BPA. 

I do think the O's were looking at college arms that could be ready quickly at that time.

I was just looking at some 2008 mock drafts.   Everyone had the O’s picking Matusz.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it's the whole draft for need thing. Bad idea of overall grades aren't really close. Ok idea if they are. Throw in money and the ability to spend more later and there are a lot of variables in the equation that can lead a team to another direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I was just looking at some 2008 mock drafts.   Everyone had the O’s picking Matusz.   

I'm not ripping on the 2008 O's for picking Matusz.  I have defended him more than most here.

I was just saying having a player in the system shouldn't preclude you from picking the BPA.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not ripping on the 2008 O's for picking Matusz.  I have defended him more than most here.

I was just saying having a player in the system shouldn't preclude you from picking the BPA.

 

Yes, I know that’s what you meant, and I agree 100%.    I do think that when it’s a very close call as to who is BPA, it’s reasonable to factor in need in making a choice.   It’s pretty obvious the O’s really liked Cowser, because OF was far from their greatest area of need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has Blood been wrong about any of the players he's gushed about? Seems like he was right on at every step of the way this year in terms of how they performed. Now, he's probably just relaying information that he's been given by the actual scouts and coaches in the organization, but they've been right. It's not like he's sitting there saying Caydn Grenier is going to be an above average everyday SS. Most of what he's said is these guys that we drafted high and are pretty highly regarded nationally are great and keep an eye out for these more unheralded guys (Ortiz, Stowers, Mayo etc) even though they have a long way to go. I feel like people don't actually listen to what these guys say. I've listened to just about every interview I can and in every single one Blood, Elias or whoever basically says "I like this guy. He does this and that well let's see how he does as he moves up." They are obviously positive of the guys in their system as literally any FO is, but to say it's "propaganda" is hyperbolic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I suspect he's had gushing reviews of middle of the road prospects. Not that they're trash, but they can't all be 5 tool players.

I'd have to re-read the interviews.  He's enthusiastic which is fine.   Does he misstate things?   That would different.   If someone said Mountcastle had a 50 arm when he was a prospect then we'd be less trusting of that guy's opinion.    So, if you are going to be crtical of Matt Blood or accuse him of drinking to much Orange Kool-Aid then where has he been inaccurate in his description of individual prospects?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2021 Orioles Stats

2021 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Cardinals were smart enough not to resign Pujols when he hit his 30’s knowing he would never be able to match the production from the first decade of his career. With the way the Orioles have operated during the Angelos era they almost certainly resign a player of that caliber. It’s a mistake you can’t make when you’re not the Yankees or Dodgers. The Cardinals usually avoid these kind of crippling moves and that keeps them competitive. With Elias hopefully we see that with the O’s. 
    • Marte, who may considered the best CF option via FA, was just signed by the Mets.
    • On the contrary, it is completely true. The team will have ebbs and flows, based on random chance And misfortune such as is happening to Kjested right now, But if you avoid long-term contracts, all of which are stupid, trade your guys at peak value and restock the farm, and there’s no reason why you can’t continually be a positive team. The Cardinals do it and they never have a single digit draft choice they always draft in the high teens, and yet they still have a good team over and over.
    • Going into 2009, Tillman was BA’s no. 22 prospect, Matusz no. 25, Arrieta no. 67.   Britton wasn’t ranked yet but was no. 63 the next year.  Brad Bergesen was the reigning Eastern League pitcher of the year.   David Hernandez had led the league. In strikeouts.   So, it was a more impressive group than your post suggests.   
    • Even worse living with the knowledge that Cardinals owner Bill DeWitt Jr. could have been the Orioles owner all this time, but thanks to Peter Angelos outbidding him it never happened. 
    • Nothing happens til it happens, but can we glean anything meaningful from what the insiders say?   ”Listening to offers” means nothing. Does anyone NOT listen to offers? However, that’s probably indicates less interest than a term like… ”Dangling.” What does that mean? Is GM A calling up GM B and saying,” hey, I got this hot guy, and he can be yours! All I need is XX.” Is GM A being coy and hitting that MAAAAAAYBE he’ll listen…? Regardless, it probably indicates more desire to trade, but maybe not as much as… “Eager to deal” or “seeking the best matchup” which is where GM A is calling up everyone in the Rolodex and saying,” Have I got a deal for you! AND if you ACT NOW…no? Well, how about……etc etc” All  those terms indicate at least partially dealing from a position of “I don’t have to” “I’m in no hurry” “if you don’t, someone else will,” and so on. But pity the guys who… ”Are willing to eat most of the contract…” the fools who rush in, and then find it veeeeery expensive to rush back out.. poor San Diego would be less poor if they hadn’t flung all that cash at Mr Hosmer, but they did, and he has been smiling ever since…and they..” are willing to eat most of his contract” Anyway, where does that leave the Orioles? We’re listening. Sure we are. Everyone listens except your cat in the backyard who doesn’t want to come in yet. We are “dangling”…. That means we’re listening a bit more earnestly, but still it’s our call. Nothing will happen unless it’s very good for the Bmore boys. So let’s see what kind of horse trader Mike is, and what can he bring home in return for the shiny bauble he is dangling…
    • I think we are going to have to get some favorable results from our own young pitchers to improve significantly in 2022. Last year was a bottom 20% outcome in that regard compared to the range of possible outcomes from that group.    If things break the other way in 2022 we could see a lot more wins.   But you can’t just expect that to happen given their performance to date.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...