Jump to content
waynebug

Tim Dierkes: Orioles should trade John Means

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think, at least for some folks, is they are hoping they sell.

I've been thinking they would sell a soon as something happens to their father. There's really no other reason to run a team in the ground like they have, and for so long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, maybenxtyr said:

I've been thinking they would sell a soon as something happens to their father. There's really no other reason to run a team in the ground like they have, and for so long.

Why sell when you can just keep payroll low and rake in profits?  Team values never go down and demands for teams is always high.  I don't see an incentive to sell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why sell when you can just keep payroll low and rake in profits?  Team values never go down and demands for teams is always high.  I don't see an incentive to sell.

I don't disagree, but eventually any interest will fall off. I guess there will be profits still, but they may be interested in a chunk and move on with their lives. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why sell when you can just keep payroll low and rake in profits?  Team values never go down and demands for teams is always high. I don't see an incentive to sell.

So, as a seller, wouldn’t that be a reason to maximize profit, especially in a business for which you had little interest in its overall success?

Demand for a team in a profitable sports league is high. And they will have made a boatload of money compared to the purchase price. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

So, as a seller, wouldn’t that be a reason to maximize profit, especially in a business for which you had little interest in its overall success?

Demand for a team in a profitable sports league is high. And they will have made a boatload of money compared to the purchase price. 

I'm not saying they won't sell, just that I don't see anything that leads me to believe they will pick one path or the other.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not saying they won't sell, just that I don't see anything that leads me to believe they will pick one path or the other.

Agreed. No indication one way or the other, which, is also frustrating for many of the fan base.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think all these low payroll savings are earmarked for the estate tax and not a front line pitcher in 2023.

Why does estate tax have anything  to do with the O's sale?

Peter is 92.   He has been married to Georgia since 1966.   55 years.   Long before he/they bought the Orioles.   According to White Pages Georgia is 79 years old.

Georgia Angelos
Age 79
Monkton, MD
 
So if there are martial rights from husband to wife which do not require estate taxes why would they  matter?
 
 
 
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would we dump money into a team that might now win 50 games?  I’d trade Means and bring in someone other than Holt. Maybe all the pitchers failing isn’t his fault, but someone has to take the fall. Literally no starting pitcher has seized the opportunity, and it looks like they’ve regressed with the yanking up/down. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Why would we dump money into a team that might now win 50 games?  I’d trade Means and bring in someone other than Holt. Maybe all the pitchers failing isn’t his fault, but someone has to take the fall. Literally no starting pitcher has seized the opportunity, and it looks like they’ve regressed with the yanking up/down. 

So you are suggesting that in year four of the rebuild under Elias the team could still be sitting at a 50- 112 mark?  

That would be getting into historical levels of ineptitude right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Why does estate tax have anything  to do with the O's sale?

Peter is 92.   He has been married to Georgia since 1966.   55 years.   Long before he/they bought the Orioles.   According to White Pages Georgia is 79 years old.

Georgia Angelos
Age 79
Monkton, MD
 
So if there are martial right from husband to wife which do not require estate taxes why would they  matter?
 
 
 
 

 

 

If Peter leaves all his assets to his widow, there will be no estate tax due on his death. (I think the same is true of the Maryland inheritance tax.) Instead, those estate tax obligations will arise upon her death. That is, the estate and inheritance taxes won't go away; they will just get deferred until her death. And there's some prospect that those taxes will be increased as recently introduced legislation wends its way through Congress to possible enactment and go into effect.

Under the MLB Constitution, in order for a bequest of Peter Angelos that his majority interest in the Orioles be left to Georgia Angelos to become effective, Georgia would would to be approved as the new majority owner by a majority of MLB teams. I think it's unlikely that MLB owners would approve Georgia Angelos as the owner of the Orioles, in light of these facts (that is, facts as I understand them): (a) her inexperience in running a sports franchise (or any other business, so far as I know), (b) the lack of income available to her from sources other than baseball, and the financial insecurity of the Orioles franchise and its inability to withstand financial hardships from a work stoppage, pandemic, etc., (c) her husband's and sons' miserable record running the Orioles over the decades, including not only lack of success on the field but also a constant stream of poor decisions that have weakened the franchise and embarrassed MLB, (d) the fact that the Angelos family's ownership of the team will be limited since her estate will be forced to sell the team when she dies, and (e) the personal enmity of the Commissioner and some owners -- I don't know how many -- toward Peter Angelos.

I can imagine that the owners would give Georgia Angelos some time to sell the team -- maybe two or even five years, something like that -- but I would be surprised if they approved her as the owner of the Baltimore Orioles without some strict limitation on that. 

 

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, 7Mo said:

I was just about to ask Sports Guy. I see all the speculation about a sale but is there anything concrete anywhere, of any kind, indicating a post mortem sale? 

If estate taxes were actually an issue, why wouldn't the brothers just sell minority interests and keep the majority?

Well, you have to have the desire to keep it and there are issues with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

 

If Peter leaves all his assets to his widow, there will be no estate tax due on his death. (I think the same is true of the Maryland inheritance tax.) Instead, those estate tax obligations will arise upon her death. That is, the estate and inheritance taxes won't go away; they will just get deferred until her death. And there's some prospect that those taxes will be increased as recently introduced legislation wends its way through Congress to possible enactment and go into effect.

Under the MLB Constitution, in order for a bequest of Peter Angelos that his majority interest in the Orioles be left to Georgia Angelos to become effective, Georgia would would to be approved as the new majority owner by a majority of MLB teams. I think it's unlikely that MLB owners would approve Georgia Angelos as the owner of the Orioles, in light of these facts (that is, facts as I understand them): (a) her inexperience in running a sports franchise (or any other business, so far as I know), (b) the lack of income available to her from sources other than baseball, and the financial insecurity of the Orioles franchise and its inability to withstand financial hardships from a work stoppage, pandemic, etc., (c) her husband's and sons' miserable record running the Orioles over the decades, including not only lack of success on the field but also a constant stream of poor decisions that have weakened the franchise and embarrassed MLB, (d) the fact that the Angelos family's ownership of the team will be limited since her estate will be forced to sell the team when she dies, and (e) the personal enmity of the Commissioner and some owners -- I don't know how many -- toward Peter Angelos.

I can imagine that the owners would give Georgia Angelos some time to sell the team -- maybe two or even five years, something like that -- but I would be surprised if they approved her as the owner of the Baltimore Orioles without some strict limitation on that. 

 

 

I question your 2nd paragraph.   If Georgia becomes owner with John as Orioles Executive he has already been officially name to running the team.   He has been involved with the team through he 2012-2016 period where they won more games than any team in the League.   That is a measure of success.  John has also managed MASN.

As far as the MASN lawsuit with MLB.  This sounds like a good reason to settle the issue without the Angelos Suing MLB yet again for not allowing them to continue as owners.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/16/2021 at 3:32 PM, waynebug said:

There's also the issue that if you extend him you're buying into his age 32 season.

Dierkes is the owner and creator of MLB Trade Rumors.  He gets 100s of thousands of views every day.

Today's Mailbag was for subscribers only.  I think I pay $3 a month.

"Quint" asked  would he trade Means and what could he expect to get in return.   He mentioned outfielder Robert Hassell of the Padres currently the #37 prospect in somebody's eyes. 

I would trade Means for Hassell in a heartbeat. Hassell is going to be a stud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2021 Orioles Stats

2021 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • So, he doesn’t miss bats, he gives up homers, HR rate is high, his FIP and xFIP were in line with his ERA and he was overpaid.  His walk rate is good though. He isn’t good.     Now, all of that being said, in the last 2 full ML seasons, he has 58 starts.  He threw 180 Innings in 2021.  As was mentioned, he pitched 6 innings or more 18 times and only went less than 5 IP in 7 of his starts.   In 21 of his starts, he gave up 3 runs or less. Overall, he had 8 starts of 5 runs or more allowed. Btw, 2 of these games he came in as a reliever but pitched 6 and 7 innings, so I did include that in these “starter” Numbers”. Essentially, you have a guy who kept his team in the game for 75% of his appearances. That does have value on a team that has an awful staff and needs innings out of it. Is it an overpay?  Yes?  Does the money matter?  No.  If they had paid him what he’s worth, saying 3-4M, would that make anyone feel better?  Like, who cares about The extra few million? For 7 million bucks, I will take the same numbers he put up in 2021.     It’s not really a good signing but it’s they did spend some money and they did address the idea that they need innings out of their starter.  That’s about as much as we can hope for. 
    • I hate defending this team at times but if you are any of those pitchers would you come here or go to a team that can contend? 
    • Don’t the exact opposite of what? And your first paragraph is stuff that almost every team does and you don’t need to lose in purpose for several years in a row to accomplish that.
    • Would have preferred any of those other guts you listed: Bundy, Hill, Wacha or Kluber
    • Not that this move would excite anyone other than Lyles and his family/friends they have to spend some money.     I’m not saying spending $6M this year with a $1M buyout next year will flip the narrative about the Orioles but from an optics view alone they have to do something.  
    • What’s stopping them from making a move like Brault? This certainly should not. 
    • I'd guess that they will still sign someone like Brault in addition to the Lyle's signing.    I don't care for the signing, but if he can pitch to a shade over 5 ERA and 170-180 innings he'd be an ace in Baltimore. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...