Jump to content
Just Regular

Trade possibility - Dallas Keuchel

Recommended Posts

Wow, has he been bad this year.   I saw an early season start where the hometown announcers had an anecdote like Keuchel's making it 162 games again plan was ramping up more slowly, throwing easier in the spring.  It hasn't worked.   He has 1/19.5 left on his contract for 2022, and if they wanted to move on from him, for the White Sox it would be one of those money or players choices.   Under contract, so no player wooing needed.

White Sox having a great year, helped by Cease growth, Lynn excellence and Carlos Rodon making himself soooo much $$$ this year.   Reynaldo Lopez pitching better after vision correction surgery, I'm not sure if Kopech/Crochet are forever relievers in their mind, or how much urgency they will have for keeping their homegrown Rodon, belatedly brilliant.   October performances could color the juju any number of ways.

Anyhow, entering 2022, White Sox SP options:

Arb2 Lucas Giolito

Market price Lance Lynn

<Impending FA Carlos Rodon>

0-3 club Dylan Cease

Keuchel/Reynaldo/Kopech/Crochet?

They are blowing out the division and probably will again next year - Keuchel is a 162-tool more than an October tool, and if they can retain Rodon, then I think they need to give Keuchel ~$20M next year about as much as they need Eloy to tackle a wall.   Keuchel like Price checks some of the Sutcliffe-ian boxes, and can probably soak up innings credibly another year.  

The current club player relationship may have to weather one of those "don't make the playoff roster" type things before the offseason, so a Baltimore reassignment might not be as rough for him as some other established veterans.   Would $20M be enough to get Syndergaard to rehab here and Keuchel for a PTBNL?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Way to old and expensive for the youthful rebuilding Orioles.  And not even that effective since he left the Braves is he ?

But I like your aggressive approach.  

I don't even think the Orioles WANT to win yet.  Why ?  Because they're not using their early draft choices to select college pitchers that are near major league ready.   Look at the last 3 drafts, draw your own conclusions.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, waynebug said:

Way to old and expensive for the youthful rebuilding Orioles.  And not even that effective since he left the Braves is he ?

But I like your aggressive approach.  

I don't even think the Orioles WANT to win yet.  Why ?  Because they're not using their early draft choices to select college pitchers that are near major league ready.   Look at the last 3 drafts, draw your own conclusions.

 

What people need to understand is we can “want to win” as much as we can right now. If that ain’t happening anytime soon. Why?  Because the other 4 teams in our division are likely going to win 90 games this season with no signs of slowing down in 2022. Our best chance is to trade Mullins, Means, Mancini for the best packages possible and try to LOAD up for 2024+.
 

People need to be realistic. Our division is freaking loaded. Winning 82 games gets you diddly poo and we could call everyone up, sign Correa, trade for a SP, and still no touch 82 wins until 2024. Sorry. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Our division is freaking loaded. Winning 82 games gets you diddly poo and we could call everyone up, sign Correa, trade for a SP, and still no touch 82 wins until 2024. Sorry. 

I agree with the "loaded" observation but if we move from 50 to 80 wins a good number of those wins will come against those 4 teams because of unbalanced schedule. That said, we could spend $25 M next year (EdRod $15, 4-5 yrs, Harvey 2 M, about Castro 3B, $5 M, Iggy $2 M, new backup C) approach 65-70 wins and get a better understanding of what we have in Mullins, Means, Mancini, Mountcastle, maybe sell high midyear, and have a clearer picture of what we have in Mayo & Co, Kjerstad, Baumlier. We would still get another top 10 draft pick and could put a watchable product on the field. After Means, EdRod, Harvey, none of the prospects have enough success or IP to warrant a fulltime role in 22 so use tandems for the last 2 slots like is being done in the minors. 7 guys stay on a starter schedule (Akin, Kremer, Zimmerman, Lowther) with something like Lopez, Ellis, Woods in long relief. That leaves 3-4 slots for the backend which we won't need frequently. Somebody craps the bed you move on to Wells, Baughman, etc and shuffle the chairs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Who is paying Keuchel's salary in that scenario? 

Syndergaard is interesting. Keuchel looks better than Harvey but I still wouldn't pay anywhere near $20M. If Chicago would pay $15M, sure. 

Knowing how the O's operate, the O's would send a prospect to the White Sox to have them pick up a larger part of Keuchel's salary. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would rather have DeScalfani, Grienke, Jon Gray, E-Rod, Anderson or Urena as pitchers who will likely cost $8-$13 AAV, if not less.

Now if the white Sox want to ship Keuchel and a prospect out for the salary relief, thats the type of deal rebuilding teams are going to need to start embracing especially if there's a salary floor at $100 m in the next few years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

Would rather have DeScalfani, Grienke, Jon Gray, E-Rod, Anderson or Urena as pitchers who will likely cost $8-$13 AAV, if not less.

Now if the white Sox want to ship Keuchel and a prospect out for the salary relief, thats the type of deal rebuilding teams are going to need to start embracing especially if there's a salary floor at $100 m in the next few years.

I didn't Grienke was a free agent.  O's should definitely be interested in him.  Free agent prices are always higher than predicted, especially for pitchers.  Wonder if 2 years/25-30 mill would do it? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2021 Orioles Stats

2021 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • He pitches with an attitude. I like that.
    • One thing we have in abundance that others do not is opportunity. We have the ability to give these players time to see if they can figure it out. In two years, the bulk of our top talent will be ready to join the club. This year and next will be dedicated to finding out which pieces fit into the mix of what we have already drafted. The rest will come through pulling out the checkbook to fill the spots we need to be a World Series winner. I’m glad you guys are waking up and getting comfortable with the realization that we are two years away. It takes patience but that patience is going to pay off. Also, invest in HMBL. Thank you.
    • 2011-2012 saw a 24-game improvement. A lot of that was was lucky pick ups(Hammel, Mclouth, Saunders) and calling up Manny. In 2013, we regressed to 85, which is probably a better indicator of how good the team was without the luck we had in 2012, but it is true that we can add 25 wins in 2022 without ruining the damn “Plan” We need to have good seasons from our prospects, and if guys like Mateo win a spot, they have to produce. Can Mateo give us a 2 WAR season? I don’t know. He hasn’t, but the potential is certainly there. Tanner Scott never has, and yet we keep throwing his lame ass out there. Chance Sisco was awful from day 1, but we kept him for way too long. No reason not to give Mateo a chance.  but I digress. If 2-3 of our high prospect arms meet their potential, if we acquire a good infielder, Santander is healthy, and Good and AR come up quickly, then sure we can. That’s a lot of IF, but it’s neither impossible, nor even improbable. Its all a question of whether Mike wants to wait.
    • I don't disagree with that conceptually, but I don't think it's going to happen simply because I don't think other teams will pony up the kind of return we'd need to justify trading Means, and for the same kinds of concerns that make me open to trading him.....that I don't trust he'll be able to perform at the same level he's presently seen as being. 
    • I think trading Means and leaving Grayson without a veteran in the rotation is not a good move.   So acquire the veteran starter first then maybe it makes more sense to trade Means.  Frankly, I don't think it going to happen.
    • Spent some time the other night looking at other rosters and Miami, Texas, Atlanta, and San Francisco looked like the best bets for dealing Mullins. And the kind of prospects SF could deal from didn't wow me. Same with Philadelphia. Roll Tide's suggestion of Jung/Winn seems like a reach to me, but that would be a great deal.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...