Jump to content
wildcard

What the Astros did the offseason between their 3rd and 4th years of their rebuild?

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, luismatos4prez said:

I would love the Orioles to sign Andrelton Simmons this offseason. I bet he'd come here for 2/14. A Cesar Izturis-type player at this point in his career, but that's valuable. Mateo, Urias, and Jones can fight it out for 2B/3B/UT, with Vavra and Bannon hopefully joining later.

There is not one ML-ready starting pitcher in the Orioles organization besides John Means. That is a dire situation that requires investment. You can let Akin/Kremer/Lowther/Baumann/Wells/Zim/etc battle it out for 2 rotation spots and a long man. But 2 ML starters must be acquired or this team will be an embarrassment again next year.

Do you think the team's CEO or its general manager has been embarrassed by the woeful team they've put on the field the last couple of years? I don't. And if you don't think so, do you think they'd be embarrassed by putting together another woeful team (say, 50-60 wins) next year? I don't.

I think the CEO will be content as long as next year's payroll is low enough that the team makes money despite ticket sales that are near the bottom of MLB. I think the GM will be content as long as he can stockpile high draft picks who become successful MiL performers that he can point to as evidence his rebuilding plan is working.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, bpilktree said:

The Astros had an advantage that we will never be able to match, which is they played in a weaker division with teams that spent similar amounts of money then they have.  We are in a division with teams with deep pockets or the best run franchise in baseball. 4 of the top 6 teams in the American League are in the AL East..  We will have to do it twice as good as they did to get similar results that is just the facts of playing in the AL East currently.  

You have a point, but are exaggerating to some degree.   When the O’s have a winning record outside the AL East, we can worry about the strength of the division.   Right now they are 29-50 outside the AL East.   That’s better than they are inside the AL East (18-50), but still awful.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no guess how to count it, but feel 2021 sandbagging (no Adley, developmental deployment, not signing Rick Porcello types) influenced the results so the true talent baseline is a little better with Rutschman and Rodriguez about to take the field next season.

2022 was always the only year in the process I felt unsure what it was.   Apart from the first wave of pitchers failing, I'll also wonder how much myocarditis factored into making us grind through another very likely lost year, barring the Why Not kinds of things.   If Kjerstad was who Elias thought he was as very early on Cowser/Mayo seem to be, that coulda/shoulda/woulda been another possible significant contributor for 2022's team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

Do you think the team's CEO or its general manager has been embarrassed by the woeful team they've put on the field the last couple of years? I don't. And if you don't think so, do you think they'd be embarrassed by putting together another woeful team (say, 50-60 wins) next year? I don't.

I think the CEO will be content as long as next year's payroll is low enough that the team makes money despite ticket sales that are near the bottom of MLB. I think the GM will be content as long as he can stockpile high draft picks who become successful MiL performers that he can point to as evidence his rebuilding plan is working.

As of today, the payroll for next year (including Chris Davis, Mancini, and Santander) comes in at under 40 M. It's Mike's 4th year next year. Another 110 loss season is unacceptable. If this offseason looks like the last several, I won't tune in next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting thread.  The trade for Evan Gattis actually looked like a disaster for Houston.  Gattis was a great story in his battle to make the majors, but he was an awful defensive catcher, and Folty looked like he was going to be a TOR star - before he fell apart.  Not to mention (so we won't) giving up the superbly named Rio Ruiz.      

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/18/2021 at 8:43 AM, Frobby said:

You have a point, but are exaggerating to some degree.   When the O’s have a winning record outside the AL East, we can worry about the strength of the division.   Right now they are 29-50 outside the AL East.   That’s better than they are inside the AL East (18-50), but still awful.  

I agree we have to play better vs every division but I think playing so many games against the best teams has a negative effect on the mindset of a team especially a young team..  You get a young pitcher coming up has to face the Rays then then the Jays and maybe Rays again in a three start span. You start to question if you can pitch at this level and make adjustments to how you have pitched to get you to this level and don’t pitch to your strength.  I think this is especially true for guys like Akin, Loewther and Wells they have been told forever they don’t have enough velocity to succeed at major league level you start to nibble more and more then get behind and that is trouble because their fastball is not good enough when behind.  I think that is why you see guys with similar stuff struggle in the majors so much but if they can hang around and learn to pitch at this level succeed at later ages.  These are guys like Jamie Moyer, Ruch Hill, Wade Miley, Those guys had to learn you don’t have to be perfect and nibble early in count but get ahead and then they chase pitches out if zone.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2021 Orioles Stats

2021 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I was thinking they'd go veteran to start the offseason, but with Nottingham in the picture now, he seems like a guy that Elias is going to at least give a chance to earn a big league job. Given he's out of options, I don't see him breaking camp with the club just to be DFA'ed a couple weeks later when Adley is promoted (assuming he starts the year in the minors, pending CBA). I'm not sure they give him a job right out, but I don't think they're going to have him fight just to earn a job for a couple weeks to then be DFA'ed. I think he either gets a job out of spring training or starts in AAA.  That said, I think a reunion with Wynns is who they'd pair with Adley and Nottingham. I could potentially also see someone like Mathis signed after the lockout if it looks like Adley will still start the year in AAA. Mathis is a vet, obviously, but he'll play this coming season at 39 and only got in 3 games in 2021. He seems like a guy that would be brought in to camp to be a de facto coach while given a chance to hold on. 
    • I’ve always hated the Mets, but if Buck were their manager I’d have to root for him to succeed.   He had his flaws (just ask Duquette), but in the clubhouse and in the games, he was excellent.   The city really took to his personality.   It’s a real shame that things ended so poorly.    I have to say though, the fact that a highly paid player “has let it be known” that he’d like Buck to be the manager sounds like early trouble for Billy Eppler as GM.  
    • I'd rather see him on the range than on a golf course -- less chance of injury. Mini-golf would be ever better.
    • I always liked Buck, and though it's hard to know what a manager is adding (or subtracting) I thought he was a big part of the Orioles' success in the previous decade. (Seems much longer ago.) I thought that right up until October 4, 2016. Since then, I've had a difficult time evaluating Buck. I became suspicious about pretty much every in-game decision he made. I was much more critical when I read about his loopy ideas for player evaluation, disfavoring freckles, young guys with thick beards, and players light eyes, and I wondered whether any of that stuff had hurt the Orioles by affecting decisions about retaining, acquiring and using players. When the Orioles made some really bad personnel decisions, harming the future of the team, I wondered whether Buck had a role in those as others asserted confidently that he did. I have a lot of pleasant memories of Buck (as well as "Buckle up" and "I like our guys" T-shirts), but my good will towards him was pretty much used up when he was dismissed. I hope whoever manages the Mets is wildly successfully. For the Mets to improve dramatically would, from my perspective, help in a couple of ways. It would provide a good test as to whether you can build a winning team by out-spending other teams and bringing in decent management. (I think you can, as long as you combine the dollars with good -- or at least not-terrible -- decisions, and some decent luck.) Second, by attaining and sustaining on-field success for five years or so, the Mets would be likely to provide more competition for the NYYs in terms of New York media attention. Since MLB is not subject to the antitrust laws, teams are permitted to exclude competition from the outside. Only the Mets (and to a very minor degree the RS and Phillies) can compete with the NYYs for the big dollars that are out there in the gigantic NYC metro market. They've done that effectively before (especially in the 1980s). With Cohen's money and some smart baseball guys, maybe they can do it again. https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/29174512/tim-kurkjian-baseball-fix-buck-showalter-sees-things-else-see https://eutawstreetreport.com/buck-showalter-once-saved-his-dog-from-a-hurricane/
    • This is a perfect encapsulation of a certain OH dynamic: Guys who play well in a given season are bound to regress Guys who play poorly in a given season have found their new normal / true talent level
    • I hope Buck does well but he is a major reason why the team is where it is today..just as he was a major reason for the initial turnaround.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...