Jump to content
Frobby

How is it possible that Mullins won’t score 100 runs this year?

Recommended Posts

I find it astounding that with six games to play, Cedric Mullins has only 89 runs scored.   Consider: 

- 30 homers, so he’s knocked himself in 30 times.   

- 36 doubles and 5 triples, where all that  was needed was a single or in some cases a sac fly to score him.  

- 168 singles + walks + HBP

- 30 stolen bases, so that’s a bunch more times that a single or sac fly could have scored him.  

- 20 of his doubles, 3 of his triples, and 68 of his singles/walks/HBP came when leading off the inning.   

Seems to me he should have scored 100 runs easily, but he probably won’t come close.   

I realize we don’t have the strongest lineup, but it doesn’t seem that feeble until you get to the bottom half of the order, which should be largely irrelevant to Mullins’ run scoring.   
 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I find it astounding that with six games to play, Cedric Mullins has only 89 runs scored.   Consider: 

- 30 homers, so he’s knocked himself in 30 times.   

- 36 doubles and 5 triples, where all that  was needed was a single or in some cases a sac fly to score him.  

- 168 singles + walks + HBP

- 30 stolen bases, so that’s a bunch more times that a single or sac fly could have scored him.  

- 20 of his doubles, 3 of his triples, and 68 of his singles/walks/HBP came when leading off the inning.   

Seems to me he should have scored 100 runs easily, but he probably won’t come close.   

I realize we don’t have the strongest lineup, but it doesn’t seem that feeble until you get to the bottom half of the order, which should be largely irrelevant to Mullins’ run scoring.   
 

A lot of bad hitters behind him? This is a team that batted Franco 4th 17 times, 5th 18 times and 3rd twice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The OBP of the Orioles batting order following Mullins hasn't been very good this year. Even while Cedric has been getting on base the players batting behind him have been making a lot of outs.  

OBP

Batting 2nd: .283

Batting 3rd: .308

Batting 4th: .314

Batting 5th: .307 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Also not many RBI for 40 hr.

Hitting leadoff gives him a pass on RBI. The lack of runs scored is a mystery. You'd think he'd muster more than Mitch Haniger who is also not in the greatest lineup and OBP is like 60 points lower. Baseball is a funny game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

The OBP of the Orioles batting order following Mullins hasn't been very good this year. Even while Cedric has been getting on base the players batting behind him have been making a lot of outs.  

OBP

Batting 2nd: .283

Batting 3rd: .308

Batting 4th: .314

Batting 5th: .307 

2nd has just been awful.  Who has batted 2nd the most.  I know recently Hays and Mountcastle have been there a lot.  Raising OBP is a desperate need for this team. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I always thought scoring runs was the biggest overrated counting stat.  It relies a lot on who's behind you in the order and as we're seeing here...if it's not that great, you're not going to score runs.  

it can show you, guys with great running ability, note, I didnt say speed. Speed helps, but doesnt do squat for you, if you have no base running IQ

the guys that can score from first/second/third, by knowing who is in the outfield and getting good jump on the crack of the bat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

it can show you, guys with great running ability, note, I didnt say speed. Speed helps, but doesnt do squat for you, if you have no base running IQ

the guys that can score from first/second/third, by knowing who is in the outfield and getting good jump on the crack of the bat.

Right, but you can't tell who can do that based off the number of runs they've scored.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is strange. Cedric is only 19th in the AL in runs scored (but just 3 runs behind number 13). Even more surprising: Cedric leads the league with 99 hits with no outs, 10 more than Altuve, who's in second place. You would think lots of no-out hits would lead to lots of runs, but it obviously depends on the guys batting after you,

I wouldn't look so much at the OBP of hitters after Cedric since getting on base without a hit usually won't drive a runner in. I would guess that their BAs and SLGs are more important. The Orioles' 2 through 5 hitters have been really bad in both slugging and batting average: 

Batting second: .217 in BA (15th in the AL), .403 in slugging (9th in the AL)
Batting third: .253 (9th), .419 (11th)
Batting fourth: .242 (12th), .422 (13th)
Batting fifth: 12th (.228), .385 (13th)

The Orioles' second through fifth hitters rank 8th, 12th, 14th and 12th in the AL in RBIs. That seems to fit Cedric's surprisingly low runs-scored total: the guys following him haven't been very good at driving in Cedric, each other or anyone else. 

Cedric's low RBI total doesn't surprise me when you look at how bad the hitters before Cedric -- that is, the bottom of the batting order -- have been at getting on base and giving him RBI opportunities.

Batting seventh: .283 in OBP (13th in the AL)
Batting eighth: .244 in OBP (15th, last by 23 points)
Batting ninth: .283 in OBP (13th)

Something I didn't really expect when I looked at these numbers: they remind me that, other than Cedric, Mountcastle among rookies (though he shouldn't qualify, IMO), and maybe Hays, the Orioles' offense has been really bad compared to the rest of the league. Expecting a year of growth and the advent of Rutschman to lead to a large upgrade next year is delusional.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

The OBP of the Orioles batting order following Mullins hasn't been very good this year. Even while Cedric has been getting on base the players batting behind him have been making a lot of outs.  

OBP

Batting 2nd: .283

Batting 3rd: .308

Batting 4th: .314

Batting 5th: .307 

Well this to me explains it. Some seriously low OBP's on this team. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2021 Orioles Stats

2021 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Now is a good time to start this discussion. Heading into this season, what players have value or the potential to create trade value? It's obvious we probably have another year or two of selling a couple pieces. Below is my best guess as to who Elias would be willing to move for the right price. Cedric Mullins - Has a high price tag obviously. However, we know this year is a wash competitively, could be better next year, but most likely not play off bound. That would leave Mullins here for 24 and 25 to realistically compete for the playoffs. If we can get back multiple pieces in a trade now that could help us compete by that time AND can be controlled several years beyond, it's worth listening. Will he cheaper in the meantime as you avoid Mullins arbitration years. Good sell high candidate too John Means - Same as above. Plus Means is a bit older, probably at peak value especially if he had a good start to 2022. If you had a solid return on both Means and Mullins, it could infuse the upcoming wave of talent that could make us competitive for years Trey Mancini - Best case scenario, he looks like 2019 Trey and we swing him at the deadline for a solid prospect or 2.  If he plays like he did last year, you might get a Andrew Cashner type return Austin Hays - He's currently not on the block, nor should he be, but by chance he has a blow up season like Mullins did last year, then he would share the same circumstances in regards to service time as Mullins. We'll see if we cross that bridge Cole Sulser - He was good last year. He's controllable but a tad older than the Youth movement coming, so probably reaching peak value this year Anthony Santander- Already on 4th service year. Has shown flashes of what he could be. If he stays healthy and breaks out, he could fetch a really good return. This would be the year of peak value IF he performs. Tanner Scott - Seems to always be on the cusp of a break out. If he can harness the fb and slider a little more, some will want the LHP at the deadline Paul Fry- Depends on which Paul Fry shows up to camp. He could have been traded last year but Elias didn't like the return. He'll probably take it this year Dillon Tate - No rush to trade, but saw his name come up last year. Needs to get better, and if he does, he might be worth trading as he has similar arbitration status as Mullins and Hays Roughned Odor - If by chance he figures it out and hits a bunch of fingers, he'd be a trade deadline guy, but that was our hope for Maikel Franco Jordan Lyles- Apparently there's a pretty strong market for 5.00 era innings eaters. Another potential trade deadline guy, ala Cashner  Jorge Lopez - They paid a decent penny to bring back the inconsistent starter. If he thrives in a relief role, now would be a good time to trade the soon to be 29 year old in his fourth year of service  DJ Stewart - It's a now or never year for Stewart. He probably has a better chance of getting cut than traded as it stands.  Seems to have the OBP tool, has to hit now. If he can be an .800 OPS OF/DH, he essentially becomes a poor man's Kyle Schwarber. At 28, he'd be a peak value should he perform.          
    • Well, agree to disagree.  
    • The ACC that everyone loved is dead.  The old 9 team conference with true round-robin died long before Maryland left.  The ACC thought so much of Maryland that they decided Pitt was going to be its natural rival and wasn't going to ensure any annual home and homes with UNC, Duke, State, UVA, etc..  It was the last straw from a conference that never cared about Maryland. The move to the Big Ten has been great from an academic sense (look at the expansion of the engineering program), and the basketball has been fine (I'd argue that the BIG 10 has been deeper consistently than the ACC since Maryland left).    
    • I can't be the only one that thinks 6-9 is a black hole
    • Those 3 things do matter…but MD is the destination of those local kids.  Recruiting is so different now, especially with the power of social media.     There are tons of attractive urban areas, so that really isn’t much of a factor overall.  It may help vs some Midwest school in podunk but up against a lot of the power 5 teams, not as much. Lots of schools have top notch facilities.   I mean, look at their recruiting rankings. They have had 1 top 10 Class in the last decade.  They had more classes ranked outside the top 35 than inside the top 20.     Had you asked me 5+ years ago, I would have agreed it was a top 25 job.  It’s just not the case anymore.  
    • First of all, the current state of the program absolutely matters and it matters a hell of a lot more than MDs title in 2002. Would those schools out hire?  Maybe..money is important and the Terps haven’t had any. BTw, I meant Texas Tech, not Texas A&M.  Now, we will see what TT does after losing Beard but that’s been a really good program recently. FSU has been a far better program than MD for a solid 5-10 years.  It’s not close.  They have had several first round picks, highly ranked recruiting classes and lots of tourney success, not to mention being one of the winningest programs in the ACC. Your last sentence is just wrong.  The idea that you think it’s clear is absurd. They have limited recent success(especially in March), not much national appeal, no money and no real high end picks to point to in the league recently.     Like I said, the right coach can elevate the program back to what you are saying…but as we talk now, as the job is looked at by recruits, etc…it’s not there anymore.  Things can change.  
    • I'm pretty sure these guys call the Summer Eve's Douche Bowl. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=522H44ddePQ
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...