Jump to content
SteveA

MLB CBA/Labor Dispute Thread

Recommended Posts

Might as well start this thread, news about the negotiations go here.   First big news item:

https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/mlb-almost-certain-to-have-first-work-stoppage-in-26-years-per-report/

Summary:  Winter meetings reportedly being cancelled.   Two sides have been talking since spring, neither side feels the other has come anywhere close to what it would take to bridge the gap.  Lockout at 12:00 AM December 2 appears inevitable.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And there is a whole thread on what's wrong with Major League Baseball? Start with greedy and stupid on both sides and go from there. MLB or How Not To Run A Public Relations Campaign For Your Business. At least the minor leaguers NOW have housing!

  This is also why many don't give a damn about this sport anymore. Double UGH!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Orioles0615 said:

Watch this push back the O's next window of being competitive  another 2 years. At least that's what the excuse will be in 2 years if they aren't winning. 

Yah more excuses on hand!  

Can't keep milking the pandemic forever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe more for next month, but I guess it could be vaguely interesting* to learn more about the New MLBPA Member start up process for someone like say....Robert Neustrom.

Assuming he gets added to the 40-man November 20th, and then locked out a couple weeks later.   This BA piece gives the detail 40-man members become MLBPA members.

https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/if-theres-a-mlb-lockout-in-2022-what-happens-to-the-minors-leagues/

Is it like "we need your dues"?   Does he get to weigh in on if the organization should prioritize higher minimum wage, earlier Arb, or age-based free agency?   Does he just rubber stamp whatever Trey Mancini (or whoever the Orioles Player Rep is) tells him?    Have to cover his ears if non-Union member Adley Rutschman texts him asking for him to vote "age-based free agency"?   Is a guy like Matt Wieters (not retired, but also no 2021 job at all) still a member?

The MLBPA FAQ says dues are $85/day in season, but doesn't give an offseason number.   Neustrom got $300K three years ago (plus 3 years of minor league salaries!!), but imagine there will be a few new 40-man members whose bonuses were a fraction of that years ago and were sleeping in their cars last month.

*Actually not at all, but if this is the thin gruel baseball will give while staring out the window and waiting for spring, it is a pastime I suppose.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to ask does the Chris Davis buyout have a clause to prorate the money paid out for next year’s salary if there is a lockout that extends into the regular season?

I think the season will start on time, but never bet against MLB doing something stupid. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yah more excuses on hand!  

Can't keep milking the pandemic forever.

No, no...milk the pandemic AND the work stoppage.  

 

54 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I have to ask does the Chris Davis buyout have a clause to prorate the money paid out for next year’s salary if there is a lockout that extends into the regular season?

I think the season will start on time, but never bet against MLB doing something stupid. 

 

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

It may push back some offseason things but I doubt it lasts too long.  These things tend to always look doom and gloom at first.

I think cooler heads will prevail.  

Both sides know what's at stake.  MLB and the MLBPA have to be aware that baseball is declining in popularity, lagging behind the NFL and probably the NBA.  They know that a work stoppage would be a huge, huge black mark on the game and it would dig a deeper hole, maybe one that they could truly never recover from.

There's really not much they could do.  They can't rely on Cal chasing 2,130 to gain fan interest, there's nothing like that on the horizon.  They can't turn a blind eye to a PED problem and rely on huge amounts of home runs and home run chases to revitalize interest.  

You've got guys like Ohtani and Trout to promote but they do a pathetic job of that.  There's a ton of young talent playing right now but they can't generate the interest for these guys.  

SG is right, they do look doom and gloom but I think they'll figure this out. But as OFST80s said, you can never bet against the MLB doing something stupid and Manfred is involved so...there's a chance.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

No, no...milk the pandemic AND the work stoppage.  

 

 

I think cooler heads will prevail.  

Both sides know what's at stake.  MLB and the MLBPA have to be aware that baseball is declining in popularity, lagging behind the NFL and probably the NBA.  They know that a work stoppage would be a huge, huge black mark on the game and it would dig a deeper hole, maybe one that they could truly never recover from.

There's really not much they could do.  They can't rely on Cal chasing 2,130 to gain fan interest, there's nothing like that on the horizon.  They can't turn a blind eye to a PED problem and rely on huge amounts of home runs and home run chases to revitalize interest.  

You've got guys like Ohtani and Trout to promote but they do a pathetic job of that.  There's a ton of young talent playing right now but they can't generate the interest for these guys.  

SG is right, they do look doom and gloom but I think they'll figure this out. But as OFST80s said, you can never bet against the MLB doing something stupid and Manfred is involved so...there's a chance.  

I think it's been too long since the last stoppage.  None of the players were around for it.  I think a lot of the players have a real chip on their shoulders over how they got out-negotiated the last time and they want the type of big win that owners isn't going to give them.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think it's been too long since the last stoppage.  None of the players were around for it.  I think a lot of the players have a real chip on their shoulders over how they got out-negotiated the last time and they want the type of big win that owners isn't going to give them.

 

Yeah, I can't imagine that any of the players would want to understand the damage of the '94 strike.  

Kids these days.  They only think history starts in their lifetime.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2021 Orioles Stats

2021 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Those 3 things do matter…but MD is the destination of those local kids.  Recruiting is so different now, especially with the power of social media.     There are tons of attractive urban areas, so that really isn’t much of a factor overall.  It may help vs some Midwest school in podunk but up against a lot of the power 5 teams, not as much. Lots of schools have top notch facilities.   I mean, look at their recruiting rankings. They have had 1 top 10 Class in the last decade.  They had more classes ranked outside the top 35 than inside the top 20.     Had you asked me 5+ years ago, I would have agreed it was a top 25 job.  It’s just not the case anymore.  
    • First of all, the current state of the program absolutely matters and it matters a hell of a lot more than MDs title in 2002. Would those schools out hire?  Maybe..money is important and the Terps haven’t had any. BTw, I meant Texas Tech, not Texas A&M.  Now, we will see what TT does after losing Beard but that’s been a really good program recently. FSU has been a far better program than MD for a solid 5-10 years.  It’s not close.  They have had several first round picks, highly ranked recruiting classes and lots of tourney success, not to mention being one of the winningest programs in the ACC. Your last sentence is just wrong.  The idea that you think it’s clear is absurd. They have limited recent success(especially in March), not much national appeal, no money and no real high end picks to point to in the league recently.     Like I said, the right coach can elevate the program back to what you are saying…but as we talk now, as the job is looked at by recruits, etc…it’s not there anymore.  Things can change.  
    • I'm pretty sure these guys call the Summer Eve's Douche Bowl. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=522H44ddePQ
    • Being the number one destination by a long shot in an area with top 5 amateur talent still matters. Being in an attractive major urban area still matters. Having top notch facilities and fan base still matters. Leaving the ACC hurt the programs standing.  But there's a reason the school has had such sustained stretches of success in the past.  Even under Turgeon the team was generally a top 25ish team. If you get fired for being generally top 25ish, that's because people have higher expectations for the program.  And they should.  Because the school has all the advantages to be a top 20 team annually.   Now, that's not saying this hire will end up well for MD.  They could conceivably get worse.  But that won't be because of the program's potential.
    • I think you're looking at it the wrong way by placing too much emphasis on the current state of the program.  I of course don't think thry are currently a top-25 program.  But Maryland was able to lure away P5 coaches from schools that are on your list for their last 2 coaching hires, including during a time when they were facing NCAA sanctions.  On top of that, they were really close to luring away a coach (Sean Miller) from a program that I had listed as better than us.  That's fact, not theory.  I don't believe for a second that Turgeon's tenure here dropped the desirability of this job down to where we aren't still close to that level, nor do I think that the other schools closed the gap so significantly that we are worse than all of them.   Let's look at it another way.  If Iowa lost its coach and were looking for a coach this offseason, would they beat us out in terms of hires?  Would TAMU?   Would Alabama?  Would USC?  With Iowa and TAMU I feel very strongly thay they wouldn't. Especially since we already poached one coach from TAMU.  Alabama?  Maybe depending on how much a coach values environment over Benjamin's, but I also don't think Alabama would pay a coach top dollar unless it's someone like Nate Oats and has proven success with the program.  USC?  Only for someone who wants to be in LA.  FSU?  Absolutely not.  Auburn?  similar to Alabama IMO but maybe more tilted in favor of Auburn.  Arkansas?  Debatable as well.   Regardless there are enough schools on this list where I think Maryland comes out clearly ahead in this exercise that I feel comfortable putting this HC position as a top-25 job.
    • Well, Westry is out.  Smith hurt his ankle And Young was sick.  It could mean they just want more depth and that none of them are out. The McCrary thing is interesting.  Wonder if they give him carries tomorrow?
    • 2022 MLB Draft - Top 200 Prospects — Prospects Live   I posted this a month ago.  Check out his swing at No. 7.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...