Jump to content
Moose Milligan

I'm already over this offseason.

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

What should really throw Orioles fans into a fit this off season is the Pirates have signed two free agents, and they are arguably a year behind the Orioles in their rebuild.

 

35 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

The Orioles timetable seems...unique.

Can't expect them to act like a big market team like the Pirates or Rays.

I must have missed the big Pirates signings.   Who are we talking about?   Nate Kirby signing a MiL deal?   Who else?

https://www.mlb.com/pirates/roster/transactions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

I must have missed the big Pirates signings.   Who are we talking about?   Nate Kirby signing a MiL deal?   Who else?

https://www.mlb.com/pirates/roster/transactions

They signed Quintana this week.  He has some super interesting underlying stats that suggest taking a chance on him might have been a good idea (FIP under 4).  

Then there is a report they have agreed to a deal with Yoshi Tsutusgo, who did very well them late in the year.

Not big signing but when your team (Orioles) has $0 in payroll obligations outside of base salaries you expect them to take some chances.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

They signed Quintana this week.  He has some super interesting underlying stats that suggest taking a chance on him might have been a good idea (FIP under 4).  

Then there is a report they have agreed to a deal with Yoshi Tsutusgo, who did very well them late in the year.

Not big signing but when your team (Orioles) has $0 in payroll obligations outside of base salaries you expect them to take some chances.

That isn't true.  They do owe deferred payments to several players.  Cobb, Trumbo, O'Day, Cashner and Davis according to Spotrac.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

They signed Quintana this week.  He has some super interesting underlying stats that suggest taking a chance on him might have been a good idea (FIP under 4).  

Then there is a report they have agreed to a deal with Yoshi Tsutusgo, who did very well them late in the year.

Not big signing but when your team (Orioles) has $0 in payroll obligations outside of base salaries you expect them to take some chances.

Well, I would like to see them take some chances like those.   I don’t think what Elias has said rules that out, nor does the fact that we haven’t done anything before Thanksgiving.   But we’ll see — I’m not saying I expect any such signings, either.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

That isn't true.  They do owe deferred payments to several players.  Cobb, Trumbo, O'Day, Cashner and Davis according to Spotrac.

Ouch, X5. So much for "a clean slate." Ghosts of FA Xmases past...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/24/2021 at 8:27 AM, Moose Milligan said:

Matz to the Cardinals, 4 years/44 million.

That's Ubaldo money. That's Cobb money.  That's a contract this team easily could have afforded.  Even if they had to pay a little extra because we suck and the Cardinals don't, they could have gotten him.  

Yep, I'm already over this offseason, as usual there's no aggressive moves, no targeted list of players they want to go after and make offers to.  As usual, it'll be table scraps come mid February when we're looking around to see who hasn't signed and is desperate to land somewhere.  It's as plain as day to me that this franchise is going to wait until AR, G-Rod, Hall and whoever else is up before they spend anything.  

 

The point you bring up about Ubaldo and Cobb is answering your question.  Did those guys move the needle for us?

Did signing the Chad Bradford’s and David Segui’s of the world do anything to move the needle two decades ago?  

The answer is no.  

Now, I am not saying that we should keep dumpster-diving.  I personally think with the state of the minor league system, it is time to sign a Jayson Werth/George Springer type veteran to come in and take leadership in the locker room and lead the young guys by example.  But to sign a guy like Stephen Matz or DeSclafini to $10m a year plus contracts is just not a smart investment, whether you are a competing team or not.  Let’s bank that money for when we have to extend AR, or to make that splash leadership signing.   

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, ThomasTomasz said:

The point you bring up about Ubaldo and Cobb is answering your question.  Did those guys move the needle for us?

Did signing the Chad Bradford’s and David Segui’s of the world do anything to move the needle two decades ago?  

The answer is no.  

Now, I am not saying that we should keep dumpster-diving.  I personally think with the state of the minor league system, it is time to sign a Jayson Werth/George Springer type veteran to come in and take leadership in the locker room and lead the young guys by example.  But to sign a guy like Stephen Matz or DeSclafini to $10m a year plus contracts is just not a smart investment, whether you are a competing team or not.  Let’s bank that money for when we have to extend AR, or to make that splash leadership signing.   

Because we have any evidence that money not spent today will be money available tomorrow.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because we have any evidence that money not spent today will be money available tomorrow.

 

With the amount of changes made to the front office and development pipeline, I am willing to give the benefit of the doubt that they will follow what the Astros and others did and start spending when the time is right.  I never thought Peter would allow them to go into Latin America, but here we are.  I never thought we would have a legit analytics department, but here we are.  I never thought some of the guys who were let go would ever be let go, but again, here we are.  

I definitely understand where some might not give them the benefit of the doubt, and that is OK.  It’s also not our money, no matter what side of the discussion we sit on.  Either way, I also don’t see spending that kind of money on middling 30 and over starters as being something that is going to move the needle.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ThomasTomasz said:

The point you bring up about Ubaldo and Cobb is answering your question.  Did those guys move the needle for us?

Did signing the Chad Bradford’s and David Segui’s of the world do anything to move the needle two decades ago?  

The answer is no.  

Now, I am not saying that we should keep dumpster-diving.  I personally think with the state of the minor league system, it is time to sign a Jayson Werth/George Springer type veteran to come in and take leadership in the locker room and lead the young guys by example.  But to sign a guy like Stephen Matz or DeSclafini to $10m a year plus contracts is just not a smart investment, whether you are a competing team or not.  Let’s bank that money for when we have to extend AR, or to make that splash leadership signing.   

That’s right. You’re exactly right. Every 4/44 contract or a contract in that range won’t move the needle. Ever. We should never sign another player to a deal like that ever again. 
 

Lesson learned. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because we have any evidence that money not spent today will be money available tomorrow.

 

We definitely have evidence the opposite is true, i.e. overspending on bad contracts means more constraints on future payroll. We also have no evidence to the contrary.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

That’s right. You’re exactly right. Every 4/44 contract or a contract in that range won’t move the needle. Ever. We should never sign another player to a deal like that ever again. 
 

Lesson learned. 

I agree with you completely, a lot of this type of contract gets signed and succeeds. This is what I will say about contract though.  Anecdotally it feels to me like the 2/$32-34 contracts work out a lot more often.  LeMahieu, Morton...

Also I would say this, if a small market team realizes its window is four years long it should not be signing these deals in year 3 or 4.  

You have to be real about it when you are a small market team, sustained competitive windows dont exist.  (Obligatory Tampa is an outlier statement here).  Plan for four year windows or get wrecked.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Camden_yardbird said:

I agree with you completely, a lot of this type of contract gets signed and succeeds. This is what I will say about contract though.  Anecdotally it feels to me like the 2/$32-34 contracts work out a lot more often.  LeMahieu, Morton...

Also I would say this, if a small market team realizes its window is four years long it should not be signing these deals in year 3 or 4.  

You have to be real about it when you are a small market team, sustained competitive windows dont exist.  (Obligatory Tampa is an outlier statement here).  Plan for four year windows or get wrecked.

I like the thinking here. Again, it seems the task for Elias now is to arrive at greater confidence in when the real window starts. Previous premature announcements of "the Cavalry" come to mind to suggest caution. Statements like "This is the best looking crop of young prospects, etc. etc." only go so far. More hard data and performance benchmarks are needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, now said:

I like the thinking here. Again, it seems the task for Elias now is to arrive at greater confidence in when the real window starts. Previous premature announcements of "the Calvary" come to mind to suggest caution. 

"Cavalry"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2021 Orioles Stats

2021 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • But as a GM they don't just pray for the best.  They evaluate the risk.
    • Lol…you realize that I’m aware of this, right?
    • Yea, I think you are one of those delusional MD fans to be honest.  The program just isn’t what it was.  I think you saying it’s definitively better than jobs I listed, when those schools are winning more and out recruiting them, is hilarious.   Again, it’s not a bad job..it’s still an excellent job.  But it’s not among the top 20ish job anymore…it’s lost luster.     It’s like UCONN…UConn was amongst some of the best jobs and now it’s not.  
    • Yes, this is a thread about hitting, and yes, I'm sure others have noted this, but when commenting about our anticipated SP success or failure, it seems most are not considering the impact AR will have.  Setting aside his above-average framing skills, I can absolutely foresee him helping raise the level of each and every pitcher with whom he teams up.   I'm quite sure we saw this impact when Wieters would catch for Tillman.  I really believe Tillman's success depended heavily on MW being there to guide him through jams and particularly to get him through outings when he didn't have his best stuff.  There are limits, of course, but I can't wait to see how much influence Rutschman's presence has on whatever staff we have in place. 
    • I've watched him a ton...  dare I say shades of Tony Gwynn?   But with more power!
    • Best HS bat in the draft, and most experts feel one of the best HS bats in a very long time.   Green has by far superior tools, and will be an elite outfielder, but Johnson is the better hitter with much better contact ability.   I love the idea....  I'm not sure he'd go much under slot, though...
    • I reject the idea that MD isn't an easy top 20 gig in the country.  Maybe  a little luster is off because of leaving the ACC (worst decision ever), but you're talking about a large fanbase for college basketball; top-notch facilities; a long and storied history; a campus in a large and attractive urban market; and you're the home town team, and really only major player, in probably a top 5 area for amateur talent in the country. There's no reason that MD shouldn't consistently be in the Sweet 16 and a coach/AD who can't produce those results should not be tolerated.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...