Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Give me a break.

Duke wins way more than anyone...They play smarter defense than anyone(and thus foul less)...They are more aggressive than most teams.

Lots of reasons why they get more foul shots...TO look at numbers like that is a joke and you know it.

They do NOT play smarter defense. They appear to play smarter defense because they can get away with things that other teams can't.

Look, you can protest all you want. We all know what the reality is. And we all know that there are numbers to back it up.

If you'd just admit that there's an inherent advantage, you might actually consider taking pride in it. At least that's what I'd do in your situation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And it is not the difference of 4-6 wins...It is that Duke is almost always winning the game at crunch time...It is not some back and forth struggle, where no teams are fouling.

You can not look at raw foul figures...It clearly does not tell the story and anyone who thinks it does is crazy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And it is not the difference of 4-6 wins...It is that Duke is almost always winning the game at crunch time...It is not some back and forth struggle, where no teams are fouling.

You can not look at raw foul figures...It clearly does not tell the story and anyone who thinks it does is crazy.

That's preposterous. If Dook is winning more games, they are also winning more games by blowout. And we all know that teams don't bother fouling at the end of a blowout. So it all balances out. The FTA numbers tell an awful lot.

You can't have it both ways.

Oh, and BTW, don't think we don't all notice the parade of patsies they line up early in the season that further pads the record. All of those are huge blowouts without fouling at the end, so don't tell me that the numbers should be so skewed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They do NOT play smarter defense. They appear to play smarter defense because they can get away with things that other teams can't.

Look, you can protest all you want. We all know what the reality is. And we all know that there are numbers to back it up.

If you'd just admit that there's an inherent advantage, you might actually consider taking pride in it. At least that's what I'd do in your situation.

I did say that Duke has an advantage...But to act like they are the only team is a joke and to act like they do not have an advantage because they are much better, are winning most games and are more aggressive is also a joke.

All good teams shoot more FT's than their opponents make.

I think Duke is even better about that this year because of JJ and how he drives and is intelligence with his head fakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's preposterous. If Dook is winning more games, they are also winning more games by blowout. And we all know that teams don't bother fouling at the end of a blowout. So it all balances out. The FTA numbers tell an awful lot.

You can't have it both ways.

Oh, and BTW, don't think we don't all notice the parade of patsies they line up early in the season that further pads the record. All of those are huge blowouts without fouling at the end, so don't tell me that the numbers should be so skewed.

LOL.....Pasties? They play as good a non conference schedule as anyone...The mid majors they play are always teams that win their conferences or are very good in their conference.

Unlike MD who plays crap mid majors.

And btw, every team plays those teams so why are you even bringing that up? You are such a child when you talk about Duke.

Hatred or not, let's see some intelligence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All good teams shoot more FT's than their opponents make.

Just not as many more as Dook does.

I showed you 5 top programs in the ACC. The numbers were pretty obvious. All of them are good teams. Dook should be slightly better, but not as much as they are.

Look, Carolina also gets the benefit of calls a lot. It's the nature of having a high-profile, high-tradition program. That's why you see UNC's number at 67%, but Maryland's at only 83%.

Dook's number compared to UNC's this year (55% to 67%) MIGHT be attributable to the difference in their talent levels this year. I don't think you can explain that much of a difference away so easily, but let's assume that's true.

It still means that Dook gets the benefit of about 5-15% more calls than do programs like Maryland, BC, and NC State.

I don't think that's something you can argue with. Like I said, it's oemthing you might even take pride in and flaunt.

But my reasons given for this difference still hold. K is a bully and he gets his way whether Dook deserves it or not. There's an advantage for both UNC and for Dook, but the advantage to Dook has taken on a life of its own in the past few years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice mature response...Almost relevant here.

Kind of like this one...:rolleyes:

What an idiotic statement, although i would not expect anything different from you.

Pot, kettle, black.:rolleyes:

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL.....Pasties? They play as good a non conference schedule as anyone...The mid majors they play are always teams that win their conferences or are very good in their conference.

Unlike MD who plays crap mid majors.

And btw, every team plays those teams so why are you even bringing that up? You are such a child when you talk about Duke.

Hatred or not, let's see some intelligence.

It's funny that I'm the only one producing quotes and stats, and yet I'm the one who's being childish.

I'm only trying to represent what we all know is true in a more well-defined way. There is more than just anecdotal evidence in this case. The numbers back it up, and the quotes from respected basketball sources, including opposing coaches who are liable to be fined for their comments, also lead to the same conclusion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look, the last thing I'd do is defend Dook, but SG himself admitted it was an awful no-call late. One thing I will say, refs in general do not like blowing the whistle that late and have a game decided on the stripe, happens all the time. That said, a whistle should have been blown.

ND, ALL great programs during their hey-day get the calls. When Pitino was with Kentucky, when Dean Smith was at UNC and I'm sure when the likes of Wooden and as far back as Rupp (although I wasn't alive for their periods of greatness). It's the nature of the beast. Today, Coach Ratface gets the calls and if anything, it should make a victory over Dook that much sweeter, knowing you beat their group of overrated bums as well as the refs on any given night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ND, ALL great programs during their hey-day get the calls. When Pitino was with Kentucky, when Dean Smith was at UNC and I'm sure when the likes of Wooden and as far back as Rupp (although I wasn't alive for their periods of greatness). It's the nature of the beast. Today, Coach Ratface gets the calls and if anything, it should make a victory over Dook that much sweeter, knowing you beat their group of overrated bums as well as the refs on any given night.

I don't dispute this one bit. In fact, it's what I've been saying all along. But the fact is that Coach Ratface is the beneficiary of this advantage now. That is virtually indisputable as well. And if you'd like to know the reasons, it's because a) they are a premier program; b) they are the national media darlings; and c) he bullies the refs in a way that Pitino, Smith, and Wooden wouldn't dared to have done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's funny that I'm the only one producing quotes and stats, and yet I'm the one who's being childish.

I'm only trying to represent what we all know is true in a more well-defined way. There is more than just anecdotal evidence in this case. The numbers back it up, and the quotes from respected basketball sources, including opposing coaches who are liable to be fined for their comments, also lead to the same conclusion.

This has nothing to do with "pasties" on the schedule.

Although, i suppose you are going to tell me Cleveland St and Gardner Webb are elite programs. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Look, the last thing I'd do is defend Dook, but SG himself admitted it was an awful no-call late. One thing I will say, refs in general do not like blowing the whistle that late and have a game decided on the stripe, happens all the time. That said, a whistle should have been blown.

ND, ALL great programs during their hey-day get the calls. When Pitino was with Kentucky, when Dean Smith was at UNC and I'm sure when the likes of Wooden and as far back as Rupp (although I wasn't alive for their periods of greatness). It's the nature of the beast. Today, Coach Ratface gets the calls and if anything, it should make a victory over Dook that much sweeter, knowing you beat their group of overrated bums as well as the refs on any given night.

Someone who gets it.

BTW, i think the call was not made because i think only one ref was there and he was out of position...He was behiond Sheldon so from his vantage point, it may have looked like a no call or a block.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't dispute this one bit. In fact, it's what I've been saying all along. But the fact is that Coach Ratface is the beneficiary of this advantage now. That is virtually indisputable as well. And if you'd like to know the reasons, it's because a) they are a premier program; b) they are the national media darlings; and c) he bullies the refs in a way that Pitino, Smith, and Wooden wouldn't dared to have done.

Which is why i brought up UNC and MJ to begin with...Great players/programs get the benefits of calls...As a UNC fan, you should know this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SG, please make sure to yank the stick from your rear before reading a thread with the title "Dook" again. It might make people think you aren't an idiot for once.

(*Self-edited slightly after reconsideration of content*)

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • Bailey appears to have been stretched out as a starter in the minors; understanding that he is a once through the order kinda guy, what’s the thought about him being a starter for us? An opener?
    • Now that the Rule 5 is over, Givens looks like the next domino to fall. I just don’t see him building value during the season. We’re going to be in such a mad scramble to cover innings with multi inning relievers. Givens won’t be used in a traditional “closer” role. He’d be used in a “fire stopper” role and wouldn’t see too many easy innings to pad his stats.  The reliever market looks like its moving too. The Yankees know Givens’ value, and need a Betances replacement. Now that the Rule 5 is over we can trade without having to worry about players not being protected from the MLB and MILB Rule 5 draft. 
    • I’m still holding out hope that the “look for bad contracts” quote that Connolly reported was to attempt to trade Davis. The taking back money part could be to take back a littler more than the 69 million left on his deal. 
    • Just wait until Ed Howard comes out driving the ball this spring or Reid Detmers gains a couple ticks of velocity or Zamora’s bat takes off. Not saying those things will happen, but there are guys who could jump into that top 3 discussion. Plus I’d argue Gonzales should already be in that discussion.
    • I was thinking the same thing. Look at the 2019 draft from pick #8 on. We also picked up Hanhold and Sulser at the end of the year. Now we’ve added these 8 pitchers. All NCAA pitchers with the exception of Diplan.  Its clear that we have a plan. It will make the losing at the mlb level easier next year. We’re going to see some deep staffs from Delmarva - Norfolk. Two thoughts... we still have trade chips, and we still have waivers. Last year we picked up Alberto and Austin Brice off of waivers. Both had huge years. It’s just a shame we let go of Brice, but that was before Elias had a chance to evaluate our pitching. 
    • Two guys that both can go multi innings and will help the depth of the MLB staff next year. Elias has really improved the depth of pitching in the org since last June’s draft. It’s going to be noticeable from Delmarva - Baltimore, with Baltimore lagging behind, but we’re going to see some really deep milb staff’s to give us hope for the future. 
    • Both have a chance to stick.   Bailey is pretty short at 5-10, 175.   Big jump from AA makes them more likely to begin in the pen.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...