Jump to content
YardBirds13

ACC Thread

Recommended Posts

Hey, its been a while since Duke won it...We are due.

If Duke wins tomorrow, should they get a #1 seed?

Fair enough, this one's yours. No excuses but I think we'd have won today if Lawson played.

Yes, with all of the big boys losing this week, they deserve it.

UNC

Louisville

Duke

Pitt

?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fair enough, this one's yours. No excuses but I think we'd have won today if Lawson played.
I agree but FSU did play UNC very tough with Lawson, so who knows. BTW, Duke has a very tough game tomorrow.
Yes, with all of the big boys losing this week, they deserve it.

UNC

Louisville

Duke

Pitt

Should UCONN be knocked out?

What about Memphis?

I think Duke is locked into a 2 seed, regardless of the outcome tomorrow.

Now, if Louisville loses tonight, maybe Duke has a chance at a 1 if they win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree but FSU did play UNC very tough with Lawson, so who knows. BTW, Duke has a very tough game tomorrow.

Should UCONN be knocked out?

What about Memphis?

I think Duke is locked into a 2 seed, regardless of the outcome tomorrow.

Now, if Louisville loses tonight, maybe Duke has a chance at a 1 if they win.

FSU/Duke should be a good one, no question. I almost want to root for Duke given that no "phony" ACC teams have actually won a title yet. We'll see.

I chose Pittsburgh over Connecticut because they beat them twice.

I can't stand Memphis, no way do I think they deserve a #1, but the committee might be impressed with their wins over Marshall and Central Florida. I'm not. They played 4 games against decent teams this year and went 1-3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FSU/Duke should be a good one, no question. I almost want to root for Duke given that no "phony" ACC teams have actually won a title yet. We'll see.

I chose Pittsburgh over Connecticut because they beat them twice.

I can't stand Memphis, no way do I think they deserve a #1, but the committee might be impressed with their wins over Marshall and Central Florida. I'm not.

LOL...I feel the same way...Don't see how they are more deserving of a #1 over even Mich St, much less Duke if they win tomorrow....Hell, Mizzou should get it over them if they beat Baylor IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL...I feel the same way...Don't see how they are more deserving of a #1 over even Mich St, much less Duke if they win tomorrow....Hell, Mizzou should get it over them if they beat Baylor IMO.

If Duke happens to be a #2 to Memphis #1, consider yourself lucky.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, the title is back where it belongs...UNC and Duke now tied for ACC titles.

I hate you. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Bad move and I am not going to be excited about it! I gave a list in my last posts of guys they could've taken a shot on in the rule 5. Obviously some of them aren't ready but who cares. They would've saved around 1 million dollars and as long as his glove plays who cares if you are signing a guy that going to get on base as such a low percentage anyway. I honestly thought Elias would move away from the low OBP guys that have been a staple of Orioles baseball for a long time. I understand trading Iglesias for resources ....But I don't see how signing this guy does anything but cost extra money that the Orioles are showing signs of financial distress.
    • I said I was exaggerating! I'm not incorrect in saying that this move is "Dumpster Diving" or the Bottom of Bargain Bin signing! And as @Tony-OH said they could've just gave the at bats to Martin or someone else that we have playing for the minimum. Or draft a guy in the rule 5 that perhaps has a future in MLB baseball. Like Lenyn Sosa, SS, Alfredo Rodriguez, SS , Wenceel Perez, SS , Livan Soto, SS , Leonardo Rivas, SS , Omar Estevez, 2B/SS,  Wander Javier, SS , Arquimedes Gamboa SS, Jordy Barley SS, Kevin Smith SS/3B Players that I highlighted 1) Wander Javier 60 ARM/60 GLOVE 2) Livan Soto   55 ARM/ 60 GLOVE /50 HIT 3) Leonardo Rivas 60 ARM/60 GLOVE/55 HIT (***BB PROSPECTUS 2020) 4) Arquimedes Gamboa 60 ARM/60 GLOVE /60 RUN 5) Jordy Barley 60 ARM/ 55 GLOVE/60RUN 6) Kevin Smith  60 ARM/ 55 GLOVE https://www.mlb.com/news/rule-5-draft-eligible-prospects-2020   AND DONT BE A TROLL!!  
    • Me either, but apparently they believe Galvis is a significantly better player then he's been over the last few years offensively and the major drop off last year defensively was apparently an aberration, because players normally get better at 31.  I don't hate this move, I just don't see what it does all that much. I think they could have player Sanchez at SS and probably gotten the same defense and allowed Valaika or Urias to play 2B every day to see what they have. But hey, why not bring in a 31-year old with bad defensive numbers last year and well below average stick?
    • I just dont understand why anyone would be excited about this move.
    • It was his first year back calling games in 2020 and unless Garceau started cursing during broadcasts last year, he was always going to be in the fold. 
    • We won 14 games last year and 11 games this year doing exactly what I'm saying, and Lamar won an MVP for it last year.  Brees won 12 games this year without really throwing downfield, including beating the bucs twice in the regular season.  Manning won a super bowl in 2016 without being able to throw it deep.  So no, I'm not wrong.  If you don't think Lamar specifically can succeed with midrange passes then I'd like to know why.  But there are plenty of examples of successful QBs within the past 5 years that didn't rely on deep balls.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...