Jump to content
Pedro Cerrano

I hate mid-majors and lesser conferences

Recommended Posts

I think the tournament is perfectly fine as it is. The only thing I would do, as people have already said, is give the "play in game" for the last 2 at-large teams to get in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you. Now I know the error of my ways. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. :rolleyes:

Nobody has ever said the point of the tournament was to reward the 64/65 best teams on paper. The goal is and always should be to reward teams who have played their way into it. Like it or not, the Atlantic Sun and SWAC and whatever other conference's tournament champion will have earned their way into it. I suppose that's where you and I differ in opinion. The Atlantic Sun, etc... conference tourney championship is not proof of merit to you, while I would argue that any championship at the Division I level is worth a tourney bid. Why would these teams bother playing under the Division I umbrella otherwise? Sure, a team like G-Town has played a tremendously tough schedule, but what have they done with it?

I suppose I'm ultra-touchy on this subject given that my school is competing this year as a top seed in a conference tourney for their first ever NCAA bid. Should they make it into the tourney I think they have a team that will be very competitive in their opening round game. When people argue that the team I've followed night in, night out for the past 4 months doesn't belong there at all, I find it ignorant. This is a chance for glory and national recognition for schools that spend much of the time out of the limelight. It would be a tremendous honor for my university to be represented in this tournament. Finally then, some people might actually know we exist. Why rain on the parade?

Good luck to your team. (which school is it by the way so I can root them on in their conference tourney)

Exactly the point I made in my last post as well, the added exposure is huge for following years OOC games and getting recruits.

Mason is ranked number #1 for all mid major schools next year for recruits and 26th overall with the 25 teams in front of them from major conferences plus Memphis. If Mason doesn't have great success in the 05-06 tournament, this wouldn't be possible. Having a great 07-08 season minus the Notre Dame game helps Mason to continue to add great players to the school.

Because I want G-Town in the tourney doesn’t mean they deserve to be in it. I’m not going to repeat everything I said in my previous post but you’re correct, yes they have the #1 toughest schedule but that doesn’t mean you should get a pass for not finishing games and losing 7 of 8 at one point. Since they beat Nova now they have a chance to make a strong case for an at large bid if they can win their last 2. That would make them 8-10 in the Big East with wins over a then #8Cuse, #15 Memphis, at No. 2 Connecticut, at No. 12 Villanova and wins over other bubble teams like Providence and the Terps thrashing. Unfortunately, as I type this the Hoyas are 11th in the Big East so hopefully Notre Dame loses to Nova. If Gtown makes it great but if not, they had their chances despite the #1 strength schedule and should of took care of business when they had their opportunities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Great paragraph, and it sums up why Pedro and Ravenbird are completely wrong about this.

As a fan of a mid-major and a high major team, I feel that I can see it from both sides.

But, there I cannot fathom not having the conference champs in the NCAA Tournament.

Who is your team, I'll root for them in their conference tourney. If they aren't in the CAA, root for my Dukes of JMU in the CAA Tournament!

Boo, Go Patriots!:D See you in the quarter finals. We can talk about this in the CAA thread.

I think the tournament is perfectly fine as it is. The only thing I would do, as people have already said, is give the "play in game" for the last 2 at-large teams to get in.

That would really be one of the most exciting games of the year, would be great if they did this. I could also see the team that wins this game just going in the NCAA's with a whole bunch of momentum and be able to make a run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is actually a good thread, I like the debate here.

Personally I'm kinda torn. As a UMBC fan and alum, I love Championship week because it gives us the opportunity to make the dance as we did last year. That was an incredible experience.

However, for me it felt a little bit weird as I was standing in Looney's with all of my Retriever garb on. I knew we weren't the 62nd best team in the country and to be honest....it felt a little unfair.

The system is probably the best right now because it means so much to many schools across the country and it's really a great event.

I wouldn't change it but I certainly understand your argument Pedro.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Within the last 10 years, my team has been the "victim" of two huge upsets. And I have to be honest, looking back now, I think it was great. I can't imagine the feeling that fans and alumni of those schools have when they win a game like that in the tournament. The "magic" of those upsets is why people love the NCAA tournament. Bucknell over Kansas is so memorable, and I wouldn't change a thing.

People get all up in arms on our board when Duke is on all the time, Carolina and Duke get all the calls, blah, blah, blah. Well, seeing a school like Belmont almost beat Duke is why the world fell in love with College Basketball. The Davidsons and George Masons of the world are what it's all about. I love every second of it every year.

Edited by beaner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's remember something...The only seed to never win a game is the 16 seed and I bet that happens sometime in the next 5 years...For example, I see Lunardi projecting Bowling Green as a 16 seed right now...I know the MAC isn't as good as it has been before but still, that isn't some crappy conference and that could be a dangerous game to play.

There are a lot of solid 15 seeds now and because of that, there will be some solid 16 seeds...Its not like it used to be...There are maybe 2 or 3 real gimme games per tourney and that's about it anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Carolina and Duke fans come through with back to back solid posts. A couple of Maryland fans are the ones whining. Seems like perhaps a couple people are just worried their mid-level program might miss out on the dance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let's remember something...The only seed to never win a game is the 16 seed and I bet that happens sometime in the next 5 years...For example, I see Lunardi projecting Bowling Green as a 16 seed right now...I know the MAC isn't as good as it has been before but still, that isn't some crappy conference and that could be a dangerous game to play.

There are a lot of solid 15 seeds now and because of that, there will be some solid 16 seeds...Its not like it used to be...There are maybe 2 or 3 real gimme games per tourney and that's about it anymore.

Speaking of the MAC, I was looking at the standings and in one division every team is over .500, and in the other one, every team is under .500. Weird.

I agree with what you said here, but am not sure we'll see a 16 over a 1 anytime soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Carolina and Duke fans come through with back to back solid posts. A couple of Maryland fans are the ones whining. Seems like perhaps a couple people are just worried their mid-level program might miss out on the dance.

Not to sound like an elitist jerk here, but maybe Rob and I have a different perspective given that our teams aren't "bubble" teams. Who knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not to sound like an elitist jerk here, but maybe Rob and I have a different perspective given that our teams aren't "bubble" teams. Who knows.

No, I think you do, and I don't think you sound elitist.

Maryland is on the bubble. If they just took the Top 65 teams, they would get in. All the "little conferences" are keeping Maryland out of the tournament.

Well, well, if we took the Top 120 teams UVA would get in! I think we should double the size of the field and take the Top 120 or so teams. That would help my team out and get us in the tournament, so it's totally the most fair way to do it. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Speaking of the MAC, I was looking at the standings and in one division every team is over .500, and in the other one, every team is under .500. Weird.

I agree with what you said here, but am not sure we'll see a 16 over a 1 anytime soon.

Well, with the play-in game, one of the MEAC and SWAC teams are always going to be eliminated, so that will help things some in terms of giving a 16 seed a chance.

But the MEAC has had some success..Coppin and Hampton against 2 seeds.

And Morgan ST beat MD this year...MD has beaten 2 of the best teams in the country this year.

You just never know.

The idea of a 16 seed winning is much more possible right now than it ever has been.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not to sound like an elitist jerk here, but maybe Rob and I have a different perspective given that our teams aren't "bubble" teams. Who knows.

If the 13-16 seeds were totally not competitive year in and year out, I would probably be on Pedro's side here.

But the fact is that they usually are.

Now, I am a proponent of more teams in the tourney....The field went to 64 teams in I believe 1985....The amount of D1 schools has grown tremendously since then...I am not advocated a lot more teams...Just 8 or so but I do think there should be more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, I think you do, and I don't think you sound elitist.

Maryland is on the bubble. If they just took the Top 65 teams, they would get in. All the "little conferences" are keeping Maryland out of the tournament.

Well, well, if we took the Top 120 teams UVA would get in! I think we should double the size of the field and take the Top 120 or so teams. That would help my team out and get us in the tournament, so it's totally the most fair way to do it. :rolleyes:

I root for Maryland to an extent, and think they should be in over Miami and Virginia Tech. Gonzaga, Creighton, and maybe VCU/Mason are the conferences Maryland has to worry about in my opinion. Maybe the BYU/Utah one too, but i think if the Terps win tomorrow and at UVA, they'll be fine.

Maybe we can petition the NCAA just to allow Virginia in every year regardless of record. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If the 13-16 seeds were totally not competitive year in and year out, I would probably be on Pedro's side here.

But the fact is that they usually are.

Now, I am a proponent of more teams in the tourney....The field went to 64 teams in I believe 1985....The amount of D1 schools has grown tremendously since then...I am not advocated a lot more teams...Just 8 or so but I do think there should be more.

Agreed, how many 15s have won? I can count 4 by memory, Hampton, Coppin, Richmond, and Santa Clara.

I know that plenty of 14s and 13s have won, even getting to the Sweet 16.

I would like to see 8 teams added as well. Good idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I root for Maryland to an extent, and think they should be in over Miami and Virginia Tech. Gonzaga, Creighton, and maybe VCU/Mason are the conferences Maryland has to worry about in my opinion. Maybe the BYU/Utah one too, but i think if the Terps win tomorrow and at UVA, they'll be fine.

Maybe we can petition the NCAA just to allow Virginia in every year regardless of record. ;)

Seconded on your petition!

Anyways, no worried for MD about the CAA this year. The league isn't getting an at-large bid, just didn't do enough in OOC play. The tournament is gonna be great this weekend though. JMU needs to get by W&M Friday night to get a shot at Mason in the Quarters. I'd LOVE to knock them off on Saturday evening. That would be sweet!

Memphis is another team MD fans really need to root for as well. I'd throw Xavier/Dayton in as well. And might as well root for Siena, Davidson, Utah State etc to win theirs as well just so the committee isnt tempted to put them in.

And I root for any ACC bubble team to make the tournament (unless they are playing UVA, or UVA is on the bubble and them losing would help us out). I'm holding out hope for 9 teams in the tournament. That would be unprecedented and show how good this league really is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Meeting Joe in the spring of 84, as well as attending an O's/Red Wings exhibition game in Rochester that same spring, made me an Orioles fan for life. I can't overstate how amazing it was for a rural Upstate NY kid to get to meet guys he only knew through baseball cards, or via watching them win the Series on TV 8 months prior. Joe was a great guy. RIP.   
    • Fair enough on the 2nd point, but we disagree on the first. He developed well enough to be a stud at Oregon, but there's no evidence to go on that he is a stud in pro ball yet. I think we agree he has an excellent chance at being one! I just want to see it.  
    • I didn't get why Akin was graduated, and Harvey not when Cot's has Harvey with more service time, but small beer - Akin and Kremer feel similar as many full seasons of minor league polish types where now we see if they can make it 25 turns in the Show. McKenna and Stowers getting 45-tiered with Kremer/Baumann above 40+ Jahmai and just plain 40 Lowther/Diaz was noticeable. Longenhagen's write-ups suggest 3B Gunnar (too big) and 2B Westburg (arm) already off SS Island so if it falls that way you can see the whole Late 2022 lineup save SS if guys develop well (letting Gunnar hype flow a little there). Sorting the table by Age, it was new to me how ancient Tyler Wells and Ashton Goudeau are, 26.5 and 28.6 by Opening Day respectively.
    • His development mostly happened at Oregon State. I think calling him (or most athletes) naturals do them a disservice.  I'm sure he's put a lot of work into being a "natural at everything".
    • I think that characterization is a little misleading. What does that mean, really? Is it that he projects to an average major league CF with speed? I would take that. 
    • And from everything I've heard or read about him, he was a first class person as well as a great baseball man. 
    • You're definitely not the only one. Barely played in 2019, got mono. No season all of last year. Delayed season in 2021. His development is really behind, IMO. Luckily he's supposed to be a natural at everything, but we simply haven't seen him play pro ball for anything but an extremely miniscule amount of time.  He needs to play a ton, and he needs to hit. Kind of tired of reading about his receiving, his maturity, his ability to work with pitchers, etc. Those are great but not why he was a #1 pick. I want to see him hit the cover off of the ball with regularity. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...