Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
YardBirds13

ACC Discussion Thread

Recommended Posts

Probably? They need AT LEAST 6 more wins. Their OOC schedule was really weak, so getting to 9-7 wouldn't even gurantee them a tourney spot right now. Tonight would be a big step in the right direction tonight for Tech.

I think UNC puts Ginyard on Delaney and says enough already. If you lock down Delaney, Tech is very beatable. Ginyard can do that.

I think both road teams win in the later games tonight.

VT has set themselves up pretty well in the last week. A road win tonight at NC State puts them at 6-3. With 7 games remaining, 4 of which are at home, they should have a very good opportunity to get to at least 9-7. Really looking forward to the UVA game in Cassell this weekend.

Their schedule really has been absurdly weak, both in and out of conference. Non conference schedule is ranked 346/347 teams on ESPN. In the ACC its just as bad. We play the bottom 4 teams in the current standings twice. Everyone else, with the exception of UVA, we play only once. I am thankful we don't have to make the trip to College Park this year, though that would have been my only chance to see them live.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another tough loss for the 'Hoos tonight. We were winning down the stetch, but once again we couldn't hold on to the lead. That was a very important game for us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UVA has lost 4 ACC games....2 each to Wake and VT...two in overtime and one other that came down to the final minute...Oh, what could have been...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
UVA has lost 4 ACC games....2 each to Wake and VT...two in overtime and one other that came down to the final minute...Oh, what could have been...

1-5 in games decided by 5 points or less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1-5 in games decided by 5 points or less.

That sums it up.

I just have to keep telling myself that this team wasn't supposed to win ANYTHING.

Hell, Lunardi still has us as the "Next 4 Out" in his most recent bracket. The fact that we are one of the first 8 teams just on the outside of the tournament is amazing considering what we expected this year.

With everything we have coming back and coming in next year, with another year of Coach Bennett, I can't help but be excited about the future.

And if we can steal a win in CP tonight, I'll be pretty damn excited about the present too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That sums it up.

I just have to keep telling myself that this team wasn't supposed to win ANYTHING.

Hell, Lunardi still has us as the "Next 4 Out" in his most recent bracket. The fact that we are one of the first 8 teams just on the outside of the tournament is amazing considering what we expected this year.

With everything we have coming back and coming in next year, with another year of Coach Bennett, I can't help but be excited about the future.

And if we can steal a win in CP tonight, I'll be pretty damn excited about the present too.

Yea...you may be the 5th or 6th best team in the conference for one year!!! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yea...you may be the 5th or 6th best team in the conference for one year!!! :D

Very funny.

I have pretty high hopes that UVA will be the third best team in the ACC next year behind Duke and Carolina.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Very funny.

I have pretty high hopes that UVA will be the third best team in the ACC next year behind Duke and Carolina.

Off the top of my head, MD should claim that role next year, although they may be a year away from being #3 since they will be young.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Off the top of my head, MD should claim that role next year, although they may be a year away from being #3 since they will be young.

MD's freshmen guards better be really good if they expect to claim that role. They lose Vasquez and Hayes, not to mention Milbourne. Anyone who thinks Adrian Bowie is an ACC-caliber starting PG is crazy.

I actually think VT is in a better position next year than MD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MD's freshmen guards better be really good if they expect to claim that role. They lose Vasquez and Hayes, not to mention Milbourne. Anyone who thinks Adrian Bowie is an ACC-caliber starting PG is crazy.

I actually think VT is in a better position next year than MD.

Assuming Delaney stays (and I think he will), VT is in the mix at the top of the ACC. They lose nobody and add Chaney, a top 75 player who transferred from Florida.

I think VT will be very strong next season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Assuming Delaney stays (and I think he will), VT is in the mix at the top of the ACC. They lose nobody and add Chaney, a top 75 player who transferred from Florida.

I think VT will be very strong next season.

Where would he go?

Delaney is a tremendous college player, but he isn't an NBA guy.

He was very visibly frustrated Saturday night against UVA when he wasn't getting a lot of the calls that go his way. Apparently the refs told him "Stop Flopping", which as much as I love Delaney as a player, is a big criticism against him. He flops to get calls. And gets frustrated when he doesn't get them.

I'm with you though, I expect Tech to be in the top half of the ACC next year. Duke and Carolina should be head and shoulders above everyone next year, especially if Ed Davis stays in Chapel Hill, which is looking more and more likely after this wrist injury.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While he is a very good player, Malcom Delaney is not going anywhere. He is not ready for the NBA. He is projected to be a point guard in the league because he is only 6'3. His FG% is way to low his, he has to many turnovers, and is not strong enough for the league among other things. Many draft projection websites either have him to being a late selection in the second round or most likely going undrafted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welp, so much for stealing a win at Maryland. UVA slept through that game, and are now 5-5 in the ACC. Obviously FSU at home on Wednesday is a must win. They'll probably lose at Clemson.

That puts them at 6-6. They would have to win their final 4 to have a chance. At BC and at Miami certainly are games they could win. Then they have Duke and Maryland at home. While Duke and Maryland are better teams (Duke is much better), I could see UVA knocking them off in Charlottesville.

Going into the ACC tournament at 10-6 would certainly make things interesting, especially if they had a win over Duke in their pocket. Anything less than that for UVA and it's to the NIT, but with a nice first season for Coach Bennett under wraps, and the best recruiting class in a long time coming into Charlottesville.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Welp, so much for stealing a win at Maryland. UVA slept through that game, and are now 5-5 in the ACC. Obviously FSU at home on Wednesday is a must win. They'll probably lose at Clemson.

That puts them at 6-6. They would have to win their final 4 to have a chance. At BC and at Miami certainly are games they could win. Then they have Duke and Maryland at home. While Duke and Maryland are better teams (Duke is much better), I could see UVA knocking them off in Charlottesville.

Going into the ACC tournament at 10-6 would certainly make things interesting, especially if they had a win over Duke in their pocket. Anything less than that for UVA and it's to the NIT, but with a nice first season for Coach Bennett under wraps, and the best recruiting class in a long time coming into Charlottesville.

How do you see the ACC shaping up the rest of the way in terms of ACC tourney seedings 1-12?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Correct. He and clement had cup of coffees.
    • To state the obvious, some drafts are better than others, both regarding the amount of talent available and the choices made by the teams.      To illustrate, I had a brief look at the top 30 picks in every draft from 2000-2014.    I stopped after 2014 because many of the players picked in 2015 or later are still in the minors or have only played 1-2 years in the majors, so the data on those years is woefully incomplete.    Even in this synopsis, the data on years from 2010 on are still very much in progress.    But, I think you can determine which drafts were strong and which were weak, in terms of available talent and the wisdom of the choices. 2000 Players over 10 WAR: 4 Players over 0.0 WAR: 6 Players who made the majors: 16 Top 5: Utley 64.4 (15), A. Gonzalez 43.6 (1), Wainwright 40.5 (29), Baldelli 10.2 (6), S. Burnett 5.9 (19)   2001 Players over 10 WAR: 5 Players over 0.0 WAR: 15 Players who made the majors: 19 Top 5: Mauer 55.3 (1), Teixeira 50.6 (5), Prior 16.6 (2), Floyd 15.7 (4), Lowry 10.0 (30)   2002 Players over 10 WAR: 11 Players over 0.0 WAR: 18 Players who made the majors: 24 Top 5: Greinke 71.0 (6), Hamels 59.5 (17), Cain 29.1 (25), Span  28.1 (20), Fielder 23.8 (7)   2003 Players over 10 WAR: 7 Players over 0.0 WAR: 18 Players who made the majors: 22 Top 5: Markakis 34.2 (7), Hill 24.4 (13), Danks 20.2 (9), Billingsley 17.2 (24), Maholm 11.9 (8)   2004 Players over 10 WAR: 6 Players over 0.0 WAR: 22 Players who made the majors: 27 Top 5: Verlander 71.6 (2), Weaver 34.6 (12), Walker 20.0 (11), S. Drew 15.9 (15), Butler 11.9 (14)   2005 Players over 10 WAR: 12 Players over 0.0 WAR: 20 Players who made the majors: 26 Top 5: Braun 46.8 (5), McCutchen 44.8 (11), Tulowitzki 44.5 (7), Zimmerman 38.5 (4), Gordon 35.0 (2)   2006 Players over 10 WAR: 7 Players over 0.0 WAR: 17 Players who made the majors: 23 Top 5: Kershaw 67.9 (7), Scherzer 60.1 (11), Longoria 56.0 (3), Lincecum 19.6 (10), Kennedy 17.6 (21)   2007 Players over 10 WAR: 6 Players over 0.0 WAR: 16 Players who made the majors: 22 Top 5: Price 39.4 (1), Heyward 36.9 (14), Bumbarner 36.8 (10), Porcello 19.8 (27), Wieters 18.2 (5)   2008 Players over 10 WAR: 7 Players over 0.0 WAR: 20 Players who made the majors: 26 Top 5: Posey 41.8 (5), G. Cole 23.8 (28 – not signed), Hosmer 16.7 (3), Lawrie 15.6 (16), J. Castro 12.1 (10)   2009: Players over 10 WAR: 6 Players over 0.0 WAR: 17 Players who made the majors: 22 Top 5: Trout 72.8 (25), Strasburg 33.5 (1), Pollock 19.2 (17), Minor 17.7 (7), Leake 16.9 (8)   2010 Players over 10 WAR:  7 Players over 0.0 WAR: 14 Players who made the majors: 21 Top 5: Sale 45.3 (10), Machado 36.7 (3), Harper 31.8 (1), Yelich 31.8 (23), Grandal 17.2 (12)   2011 Players over 10 WAR: 9 Players over 0.0 WAR: 23 Players who made the majors: 27 Top 5: Rendon 29.1 (6), Lindor 27.6 (8), Springer 25.4 (11), Cole 23.9 (1), S. Gray 18.1 (18)   2012 Players over 10 WAR: 5 Players over 0.0 WAR: 15 Players who made the majors: 21 Top 5: Correa 24.5 (1), C. Seager 15.7 (18), Stroman 14.7 (22), A. Russell 10.7 (11), Gausman 10.0 (4)   2013 Players over 10 WAR: 2 Players over 0.0 WAR: 15 Players who made the majors: 22 Top 5: Bryant 23.9 (2), J. Gray 10.1 (3), T. Anderson 8.7 (17), M. Gonzales 6.2 (19), Renfroe 6.1 (13)   2014 Players over 10 WAR: 5 Players over 0.0 WAR: 15 Players who made the majors: 20 Top 5: Chapman 19.8 (25), Nola 19.4 (7), T. Turner 14.1 (13), Conforto 12.4 (10), Freeland 10.6 (8)   The 2002, 2005 and 2011 drafts were pretty amazing, both in terms of the number of players chosen in the top 30 who reached the majors and the ones who were/are pretty good.    If I get a chance, I'll add to this post some of the better players who were chosen outside the top 30.      Note that only 20 of 75 players chosen in the top 5 in this 15-year period have actually been among the top 5 of the first 30 chosen players: 7 no. 1's, 4 no. 2's, 3 no. 3's, 3 no. 4's and 3 no. 5's.      We'll see how the class of 2020 pans out.    
    • Here is a list of the top 5 selections for college bats for the last 17 years.  Everyone made it to the majors with 13 having good to great careers.   The O’s should draft a college bat either Torkelson or Martin. 2000 none 2001 Teixeira 2002 none 2003 Weeks 2004 none 2005 Gordon, Clement, Zimmerman, Braun 2006. Longoria 2007 Wieters 2008 Alvarez, Posey 2009 Ackley, Sanchez 2010 none 2011 none 2012 Zunino 2013 Bryant 2014 schwarber 2015 Swanson, Bregman 2016 Senzel, Ray 2017 none    
    • My bad, it was Jeff clement.   Both he and Sanchez did have a cup of coffee in the bigs.
    • I do not want any of those widespread issues brought up by you or discussed in this thread.    Please, no response. 
    • I’m sure they were blinded by all the shinny new objects that Hall was buying them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...