Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
SurhoffRules

Hobgood's Start Tonight in Salisbury

Recommended Posts

I don't think he hit the strike zone with his change up but he only threw it two or three times that I could tell.

Actually it looks like he got a swinging strike with the change on the 2nd pitch in the first sequence. Nice pitch on the outside corner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually it looks like he got a swinging strike with the change on the 2nd pitch in the first sequence. Nice pitch on the outside corner.

That was an amazing three pitch strike out and he did get the swing and miss on that change (it had GREAT drop) but he never threw it in the zone strike. It's not meant as a knock on Hobgood as he's still working on the pitch and it could be a very good one if he gets that action on it consistently (I should note the others didn't drop nearly as much, I just happened to catch the best one of the night). It's just an observation, nothing more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quotes from Melewski:

"I thought it was a really good outing. My fastball control wasn't as good as the last time I pitched against them, but it was good enough along with the combination of my curveball being really on tonight.

"I felt really good and located the fastball well enough. Broke a few bats vs. right-handed hitters and overall felt really good," the 19-year-old righty said.

Hobgood threw 92 pitches and retired the last seven batters he faced.

He has issued one walk with ten strikeouts over his last two outings.

Hobgood said the Shorebirds have already developed a winning feeling in their clubhouse.

"Our chemistry is great. Everyone gets along with each other and messes around. We like each other, the chemistry is really good. From what I've heard it's the talk of the four minor league teams we've got. I think we are going to have a really good year."

http://masnsports.com/steve_melewski/2010/04/matt-hobgood-talks-about-his-start-tonight.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Our chemistry is great. Everyone gets along with each other and messes around. We like each other, the chemistry is really good. From what I've heard it's the talk of the four minor league teams we've got. I think we are going to have a really good year."

Awesome, let's hope they keep it up. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That was an amazing three pitch strike out and he did get the swing and miss on that change (it had GREAT drop) but he never threw it in the zone strike. It's not meant as a knock on Hobgood as he's still working on the pitch and it could be a very good one if he gets that action on it consistently (I should note the others didn't drop nearly as much, I just happened to catch the best one of the night). It's just an observation, nothing more.

Also, it's just one pitch, but it looks like he doesn't have quite the same arm speed with the change as with the FB. Nice movement, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone who was there, does he seem to have that bulldog mentality that people spoke about last year?

I was sitting behind the scouts with the mentality gun, and Hobgood sat at boxer most of the game, occasionally touching bull terrier. He only muscled up to bulldog once in the game.

Matzek sits at bulldog and touches bull mastiff. Also, he's paper trained and has all his shots.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hobgood sat at boxer most of the game, occasionally touching bull terrier. He only muscled up to bulldog once in the game.

I'm picturing a Jack Russell terrier myself, from his interview with Melewski. Sounds like he was having a great time out there tonight "getting the ball" and setting down 21 of 24 BF over 7 innings of shutout work. Who wouldn't be chasing their tail?

And, the one time he muscled up to bulldog? I'd bet money it was against Skipworth who got the HR off him last game. You didn't see that happen this time, did you? In his 3AB against Hobgood, he had 2Ks and a GO.

THAT'S the bulldog in Hobgood.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One stat I really like -- 92 pitches in 7 IP. Most 19-year olds are not that pitch-efficient.

I agree, having only 3 baserunners helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was sitting behind the scouts with the mentality gun, and Hobgood sat at boxer most of the game, occasionally touching bull terrier. He only muscled up to bulldog once in the game.

Matzek sits at bulldog and touches bull mastiff. Also, he's paper trained and has all his shots.

ROFLMAO! :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's some video from tonight's game. As I said before I'll post the HD cuts once I get somewhere with a decent connection.

Hogbood - 4th Inning - 0 Out - Strikeout

Hobgood - 4th Inning - 1 Out - Strikeout

Hobgood - Pitching Motions - 3rd Base View

Smith - Lefty on Lefty

Townsend

I'm going to try to go see Beal tomorrow morning if the weather holds up.

Great video! I especially appreciate the multiple angles as well as being able to see where the ball ended up from behind the plate.

I think it's amazing that a guy out of high school is already mixing up a fastball, changeup and curveball to get Ks at the low-A level. I couldn't help but feel sorry for the kid at the plate, wondering what the heck just happened. :laughlol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brief writeup from ESPN Daily Futures

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/insider/news/story?page=dailyfutures100421&addata=2009_insdr_mod_front_xxx_xxx

Living Up To Expectations

Matt Hobgood, RHP, Baltimore Orioles (Low-A Delmarva)

Monday's stats: 7 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 1 BB, 6 K

Hobgood was seen as an overdraft by many when the Orioles took him with the fifth overall pick in the 2009 draft, but what he lacked in ceiling, he countered with as much certainty as a high school arm can provide. At 6-foot-4 and 245 pounds, he has a frame built to eat innings, and he has well above-average command and control of slightly above-average stuff. On Monday night, he sat at 88-92 mph with his fastball, showcased a true plus curveball, and even broke out a solid changeup that projects as big league average. He could move quickly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the glowing reports.

A big curve that he can throw for strikes is a major weapon that should serve him well all of the way to the majors.

A boring fastball with a lot of movement but 88-92 velocity seems to be a potential weapon with more velocity, or a Bergesen-esque groundball machine that MUST be well located. Similar to Britton, adding a few MPH would seem to do a lot for his prospect status.

The change seems to be a work in progress, as expected.

His command appears to be at least good, which is a nice sign for a young pitcher.

So, it's a nice outing but I can see how many think he's a #3 and not a future #1. It's obviously way too early to know how his FB and CH will develop, so that's what I'll be looking for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, it's a nice outing but I can see how many think he's a #3 and not a future #1. It's obviously way too early to know how his FB and CH will develop, so that's what I'll be looking for.

Though they are very different pitchers, this comment is one reason I have likened Hobgood to Matusz. When drafted, people thought Matusz was a 3 worst case and a potential 1/2 - obviously Joe Jordan expected the better case. There seems to be a similar consensus on MH.

It will be nice to see Hobgood add a few ticks to the FB to turn that into a plus pitch.

It's been a relatively calm thread with no one as far as I can tell clamoring for or hinting a promotion is due. If MH is going to continue putting up donuts (or at least very positive results), I wonder if our FO will leave him in DelMarva all year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • The weather clause only "trumps" the equipment malfunction clause in the sense that, IF the equipment didn't malfunction (or was unintentionally used improperly), THEN the equipment malfunction clause isn't grounds for suspending the game anyway. If the equipment malfunction (or unintentional misuse thereof) IS the proximate cause (the most direct event) of the game being unable to be completed today, then the rule kicks in and the game is suspended.  Think about it this way: "But for" the grounds crew's failure to use the tarp properly, the game would have resumed less than an hour after the rain started, because there wasn't enough rain to call the game under "normal" circumstances, because a reasonably deployed tarp would have kept the infield playable after a small amount of work on it after the rain. There is no amount of rain that can fall in 15 minutes that would prevent a reasonably competent 21st century grounds crew from successfully using a tarp or other device (e.g. closing a roof) to prevent the field from getting so wet that the game can't be resumed the same day. The only way the Orioles should've been entitled to a 5-game win today is if the rain was so persistent, or the volume of it so high, that despite correct procedures being taken, the amount of time required to wait out the rain and then make the field playable would've been unreasonably long in the judgment of the umpires. But that didn't happen, so one of two things should have happened today: either (1) the grounds crew correctly deployed the tarp, and we resumed the game about an hour later, or (2) the grounds crew did not correctly deploy the tarp, and we resume the game another date.  Seems perfectly straightforward to me. This is how law in the US works, by, the way. If someone punches you in the face, you can't then fall on the ground and decide to intentionally roll around in a bed of nails, then sue for both the punch and the injuries from the nails. The guy who punched you is responsible for the punch, but not for you deciding to roll around in the bed of nails.  Here is the precedential case law: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palsgraf_v._Long_Island_Railroad_Co.
    • There's a whole discussion in the last few pages of the game thread.  Rules have different things to say about games where the weather says you can't resume, or games where non weather causes like electrical or grounds crew failures.  All the specific rules are quoted there, and they are hard to interpret.  Go there for the gory details if you want.
    • So what happens if players are no longer there, like the baserunners? Do we just replace them with someone else, like a pinch runner?
    • BTW, Kevin Gausman is tossing a gem in the same game. Although as I type that, Gabe Kapler just pulled him in the 7th after he gave up a single with just 80 pitches. KG is not happy.  
    • o   The Orioles did everything that they possibly could to make this happen ........ now, they'll have to wait until Friday to make it official.    o
    • They are both interesting, for different reasons.     Would be nice if you could combine their two skill sets into one pitcher.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...