Jump to content

2018 1st round pick (11) Grayson Rodriguez - RHP - Central Heights HS TX


Recommended Posts

6' 5 220lbs DOB: 11/16/99

Signed: $4.3M   Slot: $4.375M  Savings: $75,100

http://riveraveblues.com/2018/05/2018-draft-prospect-profile-grayson-rodriguez-172063/

Quote

Checking in at 6’5″ and between 230 and 240 pounds, Rodriguez has the look of a Yankees pitcher. He’s a tall, thick, and imposing figure on the mound, and he has the powerful fastball to back that up,

https://www.minorleagueball.com/2018/6/3/17418886/2018-mlb-draft-grayson-rodriguez-rhp-nacogdoches-texas

It seems like a big hard-throwing right-hander from Texas appears in every draft class. For the 2018 MLB draft that man is Grayson Rodriguez, right-hander from Central Heights High School in Nacogdoches, Texas.

Rodriguez was known to scouts for his successful high school and showcase performances where he showed an intriguing low-90s fastball. Nine months ago the thinking was that he was rather raw, would probably attend college at Texas A&M, develop further and be an early pick in the 2021 draft.

That timetable has moved up.

He was a different pitcher this spring, with better physical conditioning boosting his fastball and improving his game all-around. He’s up to 96-98 peak velocities now and works at 93-94. A previously-slurvy breaking ball has developed into two distinct pitches, a hard power slider and a slower but convincingly bendy curve.

There’s a change-up, too, and while it isn’t as advanced as the breaking stuff it projects as a solid pitch. His mechanics are more consistent this year and his command is good for his age. Mound presence and maturity under pressure are also positives and it doesn’t take much imagination to see him as a future number two starter.

Rodriguez has moved into first-round status and some observers like him as much, if not more, than arms like Ethan Hankins and Carter Stewart who received more pre-spring attention. It appears quite unlikely that Rodriguez will get to college at this point.

 

Luke's Take: A major pop-up guy this spring, Rodriguez added muscle and leaned up over the winter. His FB is now a solid plus pitch, sitting in the mid-90s, touching 98. He's athletic for a big dude, repeats his delivery well, and even manipulates his tempo without throwing off his mechanics. He does a good job of staying on top of his fastball and it has heavy downward plane. He recently developed two separate breaking balls that both have potential. His hard slider is the better of the two with bat missing horizontal run. It has the potential to be a true out pitch. The curveball is promising as well, it has good shape but it appears his release gives it away to some extent. There is reportedly the feel for a changeup, but I didn't see much of it in available video. 

Rodriguez when he signs, for reportedly a slightly underslot bonus, will arguably have the best arsenal of pitches in the Orioles system. He gets to his velocity with an easy delivery and a quick arm and has the potential for solid command eventually. He's got a frame that has bad body potential if he doesn't keep up with his conditioning, but could be a plus with a strong work ethic. You can definitely dream on this guy reaching a #2 starter ceiling, but he has a long developmental path ahead of him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

Another HS pitcher? Rajsich must feel no pressure. High risk, high reward. Personally not a fan of High School pitchers in the 1st round, but let's hope this guy is special. 

You know I wanted a lefty. Oh well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per usual, I'm disappointed with the Orioles choice of 1st-round draft pick. I hope I'm wrong. Good luck to the young man.

EDIT: To be more clear, I would have taken others before GR, but did/do like him, as I'd rated him about 25th. The disappointment is based on my own rankings and who was still available at our pick. Naturally, I hope he's awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know that much about the kid but superficially he reminds me of Hobgood: big-boned HS RHP who had a big velocity jump his senior year.  I would have preferred Liberatore, although to have fallen that far I'm guessing it's signability issues with him.  I would have also preferred Gorman or Winn.  Maybe the O's will save some money with this pick and are planning to draft some high-upside HS guys later.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Otter said:

I don't know that much about the kid but superficially he reminds me of Hobgood: big-boned HS RHP who had a big velocity jump his senior year.  I would have preferred Liberatore, although to have fallen that far I'm guessing it's signability issues with him.  I would have also preferred Gorman or Winn.  Maybe the O's will save some money with this pick and are planning to draft some high-upside HS guys later.  

Gorman scares me.  I wanted no part of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Otter said:

I don't know that much about the kid but superficially he reminds me of Hobgood: big-boned HS RHP who had a big velocity jump his senior year.  I would have preferred Liberatore, although to have fallen that far I'm guessing it's signability issues with him.  I would have also preferred Gorman or Winn.  Maybe the O's will save some money with this pick and are planning to draft some high-upside HS guys later.  

But this guy is a high upside HS guy. 

I read he has some of the best fb spin rates in the draft. Nasty breaking pitches. Of course he could better his change up, but how many guys really throw 4 pitches?  

I read D.Betances as a comp. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Otter said:

I don't know that much about the kid but superficially he reminds me of Hobgood: big-boned HS RHP who had a big velocity jump his senior year.  I would have preferred Liberatore, although to have fallen that far I'm guessing it's signability issues with him.  I would have also preferred Gorman or Winn.  Maybe the O's will save some money with this pick and are planning to draft some high-upside HS guys later.  

I agree - I'm hoping the pick is somewhat underslot to get someone who requires a little extra $ at #37.

I think he looks better than Hobgood, both as a pitcher and as an athlete.  But there is probably some injury risk with him (more than just the average random pitcher).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I'm going to cop out to an extent in that an elite CF changes how you look at the OF defense especially RF.  If EBJ hits enough with an 80 D he gets into the gaps and a more stationary RF like Kjerstadt is more palatable.  So to me especially in the OF it's balance between positions but an elite CF such as EBJ (as advertised) changes things.  Good defense makes for good pitching.
    • I agree with Will Clark, Chris Young, even Albert Pujols (but for different reasons than he stated). He needs to stay up.  Every pitcher he's seen has said, "I'm not going to be the one you beat" and has pitched him like he was, well, Juan Soto for lack of a better comparison in this instance. So many pitches that have painted the corners inside, outside, up, down. He's really gotten a baptism by fire.  So after 100+ plate appearances, reevaluate. I think he will have had something click in the next week and all of this hand-wringing will become history. If he's still struggling and then sent down, will he miss seeing ML pitching? Perhaps. But it's been noted that the Os farm system tries to indoctrinate good pitch selection habits before they're brought up. If he didn't have enough time to get that,  it could be the one thing he'd gain that the ML just moves too fast for. 
    • Interesting comparison to Bregman.  I recall seeing him in BP at OPACY one night and he had a tablet with him that he'd check after every BP turn.  We didn't have anything like that at the time and I was fascinated by it, but more relevant was the fact that he continued, after that initial struggle, to minutely monitor his swing every chance he got in an attempt to constantly improve.
    • Pro Athletes never have problems with confidence or failure?  Then why do teams feel the need to hire sports psychologists?   Not directed at you but the brick wall you’re discussing this with.   Players are human.  They aren’t robots.   
    • Sure, just saying Stewart isn't that fair an example since you aren't getting the good with the bad.
    • He was a -10 defensive player at a premium position. Would he not be happy with a Jeter? It wasn't that hard to figure out what I was talking about if you had stopped and thought for a second.
    • Just personal preference, thats why the thread exists. I don’t want to have to laugh off bad plays. Im not sure Nelson Cruz would be a fun player to have on your team if he was playing the field every day. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...