Jump to content

Larry Bigbie is a MAJOR RAT!


blueberryale77

Recommended Posts

The only mention of Brian Roberts is by Larry Bigbie. He claims that he introduced Roberts and Segui to Radomski and that Segui purchased something from Radomski after that meeting but Roberts was not present. He later says that in 2003 Roberts admitted to him that he had injected himself "a couple of times." He said that he did not suspect Roberts before that. NO mentions of Roberts other than this hearsay by Bigbie!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 278
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The only mention of Brian Roberts is by Larry Bigbie. He claims that he introduced Roberts and Segui to Radomski and that Segui purchased something from Radomski after that meeting but Roberts was not present. He later says that in 2003 Roberts admitted to him that he had injected himself "a couple of times." He said that he did not suspect Roberts before that. NO mentions of Roberts other than this hearsay by Bigbie!

You know that Bigbie introducing BR and Segui to Radmomski isn't hearsay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know that Bigbie introducing BR and Segui to Radmomski isn't hearsay.

It is not hearsay that Roberts met Radomski. That doesn't prove he bought anything. Why didn't Radomski mention Roberts if he was squealing like a pig and Roberts had bought something from him? The only mentions of Roberts are by Bigbie and DO NOT provide any concrete evidence. That doesn't prove he didn't do anything, but it doesn't prove he did either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting, and ironically enough I just saw Larry Bigbie the other night. We have some mutual friends, and we had a few drinks together while we were out.

I even brought up the Mitchell Report, but he didn't have much to say about it and changed the subjct quickly. I wonder if this is why...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hearsay:

1. Unverified information heard or received from another; rumor.

2. Law Evidence based on the reports of others rather than the personal knowledge of a witness and therefore generally not admissible as testimony.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting, and ironically enough I just saw Larry Bigbie the other night. We have some mutual friends, and we had a few drinks together while we were out.

I ever brought up the Mitchell Report, but he didn't have much to say about it and changed the subjct quickly. I wonder if this is why...

Um, ya think?!

Honestly, it is highly irresponsible to see Roberts named in here with so little evidence (actually none). All my suspicions about Mitchell's unscrupulousness have been confirmed. They obviously tried to find who Roberts got stuff from and couldn't, or they would have included that information. Bigbie may very well have been telling the truth, but there is simply no proof of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • He threw that fastball right down the shoot on a 1-2 count. That was not a case of Trout being Trout. It was a case of horrible location. I have to believe that it was not his intention to throw it there after he watched us beat Trout several times the night before with hard stuff up in the zone (Trout's only weakness). Maybe the extra day messed up something with Rodriguez's ability to execute? Maybe he just had a bad night? But this was not the case of the Angels being good. It was Grayson who was really bad.
    • But, but they lost. They absorbed a loss. 
    • That’s probably true and Elias said he also didn’t want to call him up if he wasn’t ready to be an everyday player.   So ………. something to keep an eye on.
    • Yea he has looked bad but while it’s fair to point that out, it’s also fair to point that some of this could be attributed to rust, an injury, not having a real ST, not playing in the field as much (I assume since he’s not catching?), etc…I think his timing is likely off and he’s working himself back into things. He has played 15 games. He has a multi hit game in 1/3 of his game so far. You point out all the Ks…what’s funny is all the Ks came in 5 games and he hasn’t struck out the last 4. To me the only thing that bothers me as of right now is the zero walks but it’s not something that would concern me long term.
    • This indicates that his timing is off. And as many have already mentioned, he is pulling off the ball. This probably due to his lower confidence (because he has been scuffling) and not trusting himself enough to stay back and go with the pitch. This will get corrected in due time.
    • That's fine we each are entitled to our opinions.  I think we both want the same thing, which is for Holliday to get it going. As to how he get's there, we will have to see how it plays out.
    • Maybe not so good that his front hip is almost in the first base dugout and he has to get fully extended just to reach a ball on the outside corner.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...