Jump to content

Soriano off the market.


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Smart move by NY IMO...Now, you will have shorter games...assuming of course that Soriano can stay healthy and perform.

Their starting pitching may not be great but if their pen is stellar, they may be ok.

On top of this, the DRays get much better with their draft picks...Sucks double for the Orioles.

Haha, dumb..Just dumb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a great way to spend money, but irrelevant for the Yankees. They get a good reliever.

Loss of 1st Rd pick is not good, but I fully expect them to spend a bunch on a stacked Latin American Class, so they will be less affected than another organization might.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boy the Angels are really screwed now.

No Lee, Crawford, Beltre or Soriano.

It's going to be hard to sell no improvement to their fanbase especially after the season Texas had and what they did in the offseason.

Moreno has apparently morphed all the way into Peter Angelos mode.

First he spent money, and now he's closed the wallet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boy the Angels are really screwed now.

No Lee, Crawford, Beltre or Soriano.

It's going to be hard to sell no improvement to their fanbase especially after the season Texas had and what they did in the offseason.

Moreno has apparently morphed all the way into Peter Angelos mode.

First he spent money, and now he's closed the wallet.

There's always Bruce Chen to hope for...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. I'll say that this move COULD have a big impact on the Yankees success in 2011, but if it doesn't they will be really regretting this deal in years two and three.

Assuming Rivera doesn't fall off the table, I'd guess Soriano will only have the possibility of being the Yankees closer a maximum of one of these three years...the third year. Relievers often fluctuate greatly in performance from year to year. Now, Soriano has had three or four really good years and a truly great season in 2010, but there are countless examples of why it's tough to rely on relievers, especially ones with injury histories such as Soriano's.

If Soriano maintains his recent level, the Yankees will really have a great 8th/9th inning combo, which is very significant, and is why I won't jump on this as a totally stupid move. However, even for the Yankees, $12 M a year and three years for a 31 year old set up man is a very big risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smart move by NY IMO...Now, you will have shorter games...assuming of course that Soriano can stay healthy and perform.

Their starting pitching may not be great but if their pen is stellar, they may be ok.

On top of this, the DRays get much better with their draft picks...Sucks double for the Orioles.

Who do they have in their bullpen besides Soriano and Rivera? Unless I'm missing someone their bullpen is far from stellar. They are going to have a dominant 8th and 9th inning guy but the bullpen guys before that don't necessarily scare me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree that this a horrible contract, I'd rather have seen the Yankees alternatives in the 8th than Soriano. As has been noted, it also helps the Rays. It makes the one team that doesn't have to worry about a farm system better, and it makes a team that knows how to draft and scout better as well. As SG stated, this is worst case for the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think that it's smart for the Yankees to pay a reliever nearly $12 mil per year for 3 years, and give up a first round pick - which Cashman swore he wouldn't do for any player other than Cliff Lee?

Okay...:rolleyes:

P.S. a first round pick to a division rival, which will also recieve a supplemental pick, and already has one of baseball's deepest farm system?

I think it's smart for the Yankees to use their huge advantage. And their huge advantage is money. $35M is nothing to them. It's likely they could add $50M or $100M to their payroll without impacting anything. They got a little stronger, and all they lost is money, which they have in spades, and a draft pick, which they can compensate for by making more international signings (essentially, more money).

And the Rays just added two high picks, poaching them from a division rival, adding to their main strength.

Don't see how either side of this could be good for the Orioles. Of course, the O's signing Soriano would have been mind-numbingly stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think that it's smart for the Yankees to pay a reliever nearly $12 mil per year for 3 years, and give up a first round pick - which Cashman swore he wouldn't do for any player other than Cliff Lee?

Okay...:rolleyes:

P.S. a first round pick to a division rival, which will also recieve a supplemental pick, and already has one of baseball's deepest farm system?

Its smart in that it doesn't matter to the Yankees. Them spending 3/35 on Soriano is like us spending 2/10 on him(or what we paid for Gregg).

Now, its not smart that they lost the pick but again, it doesn't matter to the Yankees. They just buy what they want and when you look at what is left out there and what they need to do to be good, this was a good move for them.

They are always trying to win right now and this move makes them a better team and makes them much harder to beat in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It's almost a can't-win [contract] for the Yankees," one rival official mused. "There are so many ways for it to go wrong, and almost no way it can go well, aside from a one-year contribution."

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/blog?name=olney_buster&id=6021139&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fmlb%2fblog%3fname%3dolney_buster%26id%3d602113

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't agree more. I think this is up there for one of the worst decisions this offseason.

It depends on how you look at the decision.

If you look at in a vacuum and say, was it smart to lose a pick for a set up guy, even a potentially dominant one? The answer is no.

But if you look outside of that vacuum, see that the team that signed him is the Yankees, that the money doesn't matter and that they are trying to win right now, then the decision doesn't look as bad.

From our perspective, we have to hope Soriano's injury history becomes an issue and that this is a terrible contract for NY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Their 55 relief innings are a MLB low ytd as all the starters have done well.    I think they probably want to ride those horses as much as they can as one of my takeaways from the first series was how slow all the relievers throw. Witt's a good MVP rabbit for Gunnar to chase, and he might bring up the question if a Club can still get a Prospect Promotion incentive bonus pick if the player is technically out of pre-Arb by virtue of having signed a LTC. Here are the ERA starting numbers of the lowest-tier of AL SP in strikeout rate: 6-4-8-6-8-1-10-4-7-7-6-7.    Marsh and Lugo have two of the low numbers there. Maikel Garcia has gone ice cold, a bit surprising as he looked All World against us.    They are just now getting perhaps intended starting 2B Michael Massey back from a spring injury (Adam Frazier all singles so far on the season). Burnes-Ragans rematch should have our guy's dander up...we pulled it out against the bullpen but he was outpitched by a lot that night.    Doesn't matter now but it looks like Ragans has never thrown more than about 2200 pitches in a season, in case they end up needing him for more than 26.5 regular season weeks.
    • Well, he didn't know he was going to have a short stint when he was pitching.
    • Not trying to throw hate on Bobby Witt Jr because I think he’s an elite talent. When does his baserunning become a detriment to the team? Last year he was thrown out 15 out of 64 attempts and this year 3 out of 7 attempt's. I was always under the impression you wanted to be in low 80 percent steal percentage. I heard a guess this week talk about him saying well he went what 30-50 last year. I thought to myself Gunnar could probably go 30-40 this year if he got thrown out 30 percent of the time.
    • Still hate the Royals.  But they're tough.  We were fortunate to take 2 out of 3 in our home.  Game 3 we were down 3-0 going into the bottom of the 8th and dropped 2 in the 8th and 2 in the 9th.  I would be very happy with taking 2 and ecstatic with a sweep.  Please nothing less!
    • The Orioles should just walk "OLd Man" Perez every time they can. For some reason he seems to own us the last few years. The Royals pitching has been amazing this year so far but something has to break. They are not going to pitch to a 2.79 ERA all year. The Orioles offense has been fairly hot overall so either the Royals are going to cool the bats, or the Orioles are going to bring the Royals pitching back to earth.  Burnes vs Ragans on Saturday should be a heck of a pitching duel. Of course that means the game will end 9-8. 
    • Great recap and story. Thanks for sharing. I was only 6 and 7 years old back then so knew of these guys, but didn't remember anything about them when they played for the Oriole.   Holtzman had a nice career and in the end, he got several pieces that helped us when an AL pennant in 1979 and our only World Series championship in the last 50 years in 1983. 
    • If we're going to use n=1 samples, I see your Chris Davis and raise you a Roy Thomas.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...