Jump to content

Is it time to bring back the cartoon bird logo?


ChaosLex

Is it time to bring back the cartoon bird logo?  

212 members have voted

  1. 1. Is it time to bring back the cartoon bird logo?

    • Yes, Yes, YES!!!
    • No, please GET OVER IT!!!


Recommended Posts

While making some of my earlier comments I thought about this also; there are some folks out there who would prefer that to the '66-'74 hat, though I think the '66-'74 is one of the greatest MLB hats of all time (OF ALL TIME!).

The 66-74 hat is my favorite. I would love for that to come back, although I would be fine if it were all black instead of the orange bill. As Roch said, as long as it does not have the white panel, I am all for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If we do go back...I want this one....because it's ridiculous and awesome.

http://shop.mlb.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2208326&cp=1452344.1452610.1168145

I own that one. And I wear it with... my orange jersey!

Here's a concept...

What if we do something like what the Caps did. They updated a cool retro logo that people loved, into something more modern. It fits both the people that wanted to old school back and the people that wanted something fit for the times.

washington_capitals_1992.gif2010100800002065.jpg

Could we update the cartoon bird in a similar way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I own that one. And I wear it with... my orange jersey!

Here's a concept...

What if we do something like what the Caps did. They updated a cool retro logo that people loved, into something more modern. It fits both the people that wanted to old school back and the people that wanted something fit for the times.

washington_capitals_1992.gif2010100800002065.jpg

Could we update the cartoon bird in a similar way?

No. Perfection cannot be updated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few years ago they did a bunch of Turn back the clock games - I think they did one from each decade or something. I was at the game where they wore the sleeveless alternates from the late 60s, and I had to say I was a big fan of those uniforms. Somebody else mentioned the idea of having a "retro" alternate for Sunday games. I'd love to see them use those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I'm watching the Ninth Inning of Baseball, and almost the first thing they show is the 1970 World Series and St. Brooks of 33rd Street.

As I watch, I realize that I like almost everything about those uniforms. I like the scripts on the jerseys, I like the designs with the colors. But that cartoon bird just looks so out of place. It looks like something that belonged in that late-70s and early-80s period, but came along a decade too early.

That said, I can understand those who have a dislike for the present logo. Whether it is due to the design, or the stigma of losing, or any other issue, I see that.

So, why not a compromise logo?

Some form of stylized bird that avoids being too cartoony and too realistic at the same time.

For example, I found this in a Google Image search:

IMG_7027.jpg

That could be a starting-off point (and also includes a B, which many have proposed as well).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that cartoon bird just looks so out of place. It looks like something that belonged in that late-70s and early-80s period, but came along a decade too early.

The Cartoon Bird was ahead of it's time. Let it be for all time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • A couple of things that I find interesting, Yaqui Rivera - Acquired in the Tanner Scott/Cole Sulser trade with the Marlins. Juan Nunez - Acquired in the Jorge Lopez trade.   Creed Willems - still only 20 and already in A+.  He got off to a big start last year as well and then struggled the rest of the year.  We're a little spoiled with prospect success from the college guys and HS phenoms Mayo, Holliday, and Gunnar.  The HS position players take some time.  
    • Perez threw an inning of rehab last night with Norfolk.  His velocity was down about 1.5 MPH on his sinker, and everything was down a tick, but he was getting some work in and doesn't look too far away from being ready.
    • I don’t trust that guy to be very useful despite the strong start. He’s a good regression candidate. Would rather have Kopech. 
    • O's have Fabian behind Bradfield and Mullins will likely decline after '25 when he becomes a FA. I think one of those two should be able to hold down CF. Beavers could be in the mix as well.
    • Its a total joke that Wagner isn’t it in yet. 
    • I see no dilemma. He’s under team control right now during his best season’s. When he becomes a FA he will be out of his prime. I mean I love Mullins as a player and what he brings. But when we are talking about priorities for extensions, he is nowhere near the top considering you have an MVP caliber 22 year old, an ultra talented top prospect who is 20, and your team leader is 25. Those 3 are the engine that will drive this bus toward postseason glory most probably, not Cedric Mullins. If the Yanks want to give him that kind of contract while we retain 2 out of the 3 if Henderson, Rutschman, and Holliday; then so be it!  What I shudder to think about is a prime Henderson or Holliday crushing it for one of our competitors so that we can have a declining CF. Didn’t we just do that the last go around? Where we choose to resign the (predictably) declining player while we let the younger/more talented player leave? Yes, I agree that Bradfield Jr’s development is important. But since Elias/Sig have been here they haven’t struck out on any first round picks. Also, if Bradfield proves to be a bust, they can always draft and/or develop another CF type.
    • Thanks, I missed that detail probably multi-tasking in the game thread. I do think Kimbrel has a good shot*...Wagner should go in next cycle, and the electorate in the coming years will be wrestling with how Epstein, Friedman, etc. have improved per pitch efficiency by downsizing the workload literally any individual pitcher can shoulder.      There can't not be any Hall of Famers with all this run prevention going on.    I think now that he's officially retired Strasburg will be a good debate.    Bumgarner too, though I don't believe I've seen that guy yet admitting any retirement. *better shot if say he can get the last out of an important postseason series or three in 2024.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...