Jump to content

Home run/Lineup predictions. Starting 9.


OriolesMagik11

Recommended Posts

Roberts - 10

Markakis - 18

Scott - 28

Guerrero - 20 (hoping he is traded for blocked 1B)

Lee - 23

Reynolds - 40

Jones - 20

Wieters - 17

Hardy - 8

184 Total. I am going conservative as I don't want to get my hopes up too much. But I think our team total will be over 200 this year. Obviously this is all dependant on health of the players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply
This thread should give people a lot of perspective.

The Blue Jays hit 251 home runs last year.

And finished in 4th place.

I like the move yesterday, but 'cmon!

I don't think anyone has said that more HR = more wins. But hey, atleast it's SOMETHING to get a little excited about. God knows we haven't had much of that the last decade+. I think we all know that we still need alot to go right to have a shot, but we can dream and hope. Thats what fans do. Are we better then NY or Bos? No, but i think we have improved enough to where if somethings go right for us, and Bos and NY slip a little, we can be a WC surprise. A .500 record and say 3rd place may still put us on the map for guys like Prince Fielder or other FA's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Career bests:

Roberts - 18

Markakis - 23

Lee - 46

Guerrero - 44

Scott - 27

Reynolds - 44

Jones - 25 (AAA)

Wieters - 27 (A/AA)

Hardy - 26

=280

2011

Roberts - 15

Markakis - 24

Lee - 26

Guerrero - 28

Scott - 30

Reynolds - 41

Jones - 25

Wieters - 18

Hardy - 17

=224

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone has said that more HR = more wins. .

Well, I'll say it. For this team, more HR = more wins. The lack of power last year was a big reason we scored so few runs.

And these guys also draw a lot of walks. Easily 100 more than last year. 100 more walks, 60-70 more homers, maybe 150 more runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think markakis will have a huge year and easily hit 20 hr.. I'm suprised by the projections for kakes being so low by most posters...Finally having some protection this year will make a huge difference and allow him to relax more at the plate..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think markakis will have a huge year and easily hit 20 hr.. I'm suprised by the projections for kakes being so low by most posters...Finally having some protection this year will make a huge difference and allow him to relax more at the plate..

Protection's a myth. Getting more runners on base in front of Nick might help his numbers, but it probably won't matter a wit who bats behind him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
    • My point was an overly uppercut swing isn't going to result in that low a launch angle.  Not unless he is somehow consistently topping the pitches, which seems pretty unlikely.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...