Jump to content

ESPN Radio discusses Pujols to O's in Free Agency


KSDonDada01

Recommended Posts

What do you think Pujols would said to something like a 6/210 deal with a player option that could make it 7/240?

My biggest fear is the final 3-4 seasons of the 10/300 contract. With a 6/210 (or 7/240) deal, Pujols gets $5M more per season and will still likely have a chance to sign another contract or two (1-2 year deals, of course) after that contract. It's certainly not as much guaranteed money, but it gives Pujols a lot more flexibility. Especially when you think that even if he drops off to a .850-.900 OPS level, he'll still be extremely valuable (Vlad got $8M this year as a DH, imagine what that figure would be 8 years down the road). If he only drops off to a ~.950 OPS guy, he could easily sign a 2/50 contract (or more) following the 6/210 (or 7/240) deal.

At the same time the O's are freed of at least 3/60 (and maybe 4/90) in what will be the least productive years of the contract. It's likely he'll be worth $30M+ for the first 4-5 years of the deal and still a $20M+ player for the final 2-4 years. When you look at it that way, the O's are still getting good value from such a huge contract. At that to the fact that the O's really have no future 1B and it fills a huge void.

Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If Pujols goes on the FA market the chief teams will be the Cubs and Texas. And he will be competing with Fielder, who could be seen as a great bargain compared the Albert. Neither Texas or the Cubs will be offering anywhere near 10/300. St louis can probably sign him for less than they are offering now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you think Pujols would said to something like a 6/210 deal with a player option that could make it 7/240?

My biggest fear is the final 3-4 seasons of the 10/300 contract. With a 6/210 (or 7/240) deal, Pujols gets $5M more per season and will still likely have a chance to sign another contract or two (1-2 year deals, of course) after that contract. It's certainly not as much guaranteed money, but it gives Pujols a lot more flexibility. Especially when you think that even if he drops off to a .850-.900 OPS level, he'll still be extremely valuable (Vlad got $8M this year as a DH, imagine what that figure would be 8 years down the road). If he only drops off to a ~.950 OPS guy, he could easily sign a 2/50 contract (or more) following the 6/210 (or 7/240) deal.

At the same time the O's are freed of at least 3/60 (and maybe 4/90) in what will be the least productive years of the contract. It's likely he'll be worth $30M+ for the first 4-5 years of the deal and still a $20M+ player for the final 2-4 years. When you look at it that way, the O's are still getting good value from such a huge contract. At that to the fact that the O's really have no future 1B and it fills a huge void.

Just a thought.

If Pujols wants a 10 year deal, he may have to get a Manny contract, where the final two or three years are all team options. That way both he and the team have a bit of security. If he hits, the team will continue to pick up options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Pujols wants a 10 year deal, he may have to get a Manny contract, where the final two or three years are all team options. That way both he and the team have a bit of security. If he hits, the team will continue to pick up options.

I think it may actually be the $300 million that he wants. The 10 years is just to bring the average annual salary down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree...Boston just traded a lot for AGon and will be giving him a big time extension soon enough.

Now, Papi will be gone, so would they move AGon to DH? I doubt that.

You're right, if you're thinking like Theo. John Henry is a huge Pujols fan..I can absolutely see the Sox taking a run at Albert, even after what they gave up to get AGon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see it happening, but I do find it interesting that recently the talking heads would come up with a litany of reasons why no free agent would even consider Baltimore. Now they have us as the front runner for the greatest player of a generation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right, if you're thinking like Theo. John Henry is a huge Pujols fan..I can absolutely see the Sox taking a run at Albert, even after what they gave up to get AGon.

Agon is going to get at least $25M per and so will Albert when all is said and done. You really think Boston can sustain $50M+ in payroll per year on 2 players? I know their pockets are deep but there is still a huge difference between theirs and the cavernous pockets of the Yankees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a plausible scenario:

The Orioles go 81-81 in 2011. The young pitching shows decent progress, as do Adam Jones and Matt Wieters. Not All-Star season good, but good enough to believe the teams core is on an upward trend. Attendance improves a fair amount, and fans are clearly excited for 2012. At .500, the Orioles are about 10 wins away from contending.

The addition of Pujols would make the Orioles a legitimate contender. Furthermore, it would put copious amounts of fan in the seats.

Sell-outs every night, national media coverage, the ability to embarrass the Yankee's...all very enticing to Peter Angelos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, basically this, that Westburg's underlying numbers (EV, barrel %, xwOBA) seem to point at this being pretty real, or at least that there's nothing 'undeserved / lucky' about this hot streak, if it's just that. 
    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...