Jump to content

Showalter gives Fox an earful


ChaosLex

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

My guess is this is the ST equivalent of trying to bunt to break up a perfect game...

In ST the objectives are different, so I could see being up 13-3 with a minor leaguer on the mound, that you would take in that situation.

But the Tigers did score 6 more runs.

If this was a regular season game, I'm sure Buck would have no problem having him swing away.

My guess is Buck was more ticked that Fox ignored the take sign or something like that and that it was a reoccurance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is this is the ST equivalent of trying to bunt to break up a perfect game...

In ST the objectives are different, so I could see being up 13-3 with a minor leaguer on the mound, that you would take in that situation.

But the Tigers did score 6 more runs.

If this was a regular season game, I'm sure Buck would have no problem having him swing away.

My guess is Buck was more ticked that Fox ignored the take sign or something like that and that it was a reoccurance.

Yeah, I think there's more to it. He might have a hard time getting through to Fox or perhaps this is a growing trend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've gotten the impression in the past few weeks that Buck is not sold on Fox at all. He seemed to belittle his hitting accomplishments and kept emphasizing that Fox had defensive weaknesses. I have a feeling that Buck will cut him and use this as an excuse . He did the same thing with Reimold; I suspect he had no intention to even consider keeping Nolan because of the waiver situation, but was not upfront with him (and us).

I hope we don't have a manager that feeds us BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's spring training. Jake Fox could essentially be auditioning for a role with another team in a few weeks/months. And it's only spring training in case I didn't already put that out there.

Spring training to someone trying to make a team is equivalent to the playoffs.

Just putting that out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've gotten the impression in the past few weeks that Buck is not sold on Fox at all. He seemed to belittle his hitting accomplishments and kept emphasizing that Fox had defensive weaknesses. I have a feeling that Buck will cut him and use this as an excuse . He did the same thing with Reimold; I suspect he had no intention to even consider keeping Nolan because of the waiver situation, but was not upfront with him (and us).

I hope we don't have a manager that feeds us BS.

Hey!! That is his initials. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with this is that Jake Fox is playing the game the wrong way, and more importantly, he's putting his teammates at risk. You think Leyland will hesitate to drill one of our guys because of this? You can't pull this crap.

So we get a free base because leyland decides to be a jackass? We win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • They need to add the ability to trade picks other than the awarded comp picks. 
    • IMO Bradish, Grayson, Means, Kremer, Wells Kimbrel, Cano, Webb, Baumann, Baker Coloumbe, Perez, Irvin AAA - Hall, Tate, Zimmerman, Akin It makes a lot of sense. We could bring in the Japanese reliever to have optionable depth on the RH side. We could sign Robertson. We wouldn’t have to trade a big piece for Luzardo/Cease. 
    • Do I care what Frazer thinks?    Yes,  he has been around for a while with Pittsburgh, Seattle before being part of a 101 wins in Baltimore.  He has a perspective that is interesting. I like his points about why Hyde is such a good manager.   His comment about Holliday was good to hear.     Glenn kept trying to get him pumped up about the O's being special and Frazier enjoy his time here.  Thinks they are winning group of players, some special moments but overall he wants to be on winning team and says there are other places to win. He know the chances of returning to the O's are slim.   And he also wants to get paid which is not in the cards with the O's going forward. Overall a nice interview.
    • Kimbrel has always made the most sense among the free agents. He’s the best RP that will likely be available on a 1-year deal. He really wants to close. The Orioles have a closer vacancy, and some money to spend on 2024 payroll, but seem entirely allergic to multi-year contracts. Kimbrel is a LONG way from Bautista at this stage of his career but he’s still a good RP (playoff meltdown this year notwithstanding). So long as the Orioles are willing to move him out of the closer role or play lefty matchups with Hall/Coulombe if his performance warrants that, it’s probably the best acquisition we can reasonably hope for given a multi-year deal seems unlikely. 
    • Glad the O's drew the right straws here, but still don't like the lottery system. Maybe make the top 5 worst teams draw straws for the first 5 picks and then go by record after that if you really care about tanking.  None of this is really going to stop tanking though, since tanking is really about owners cutting costs rather than getting high draft picks.
    • MLBTR is reporting that that O’s are “seriously engaged” with Craig Kimbrel.  https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2023/12/orioles-seriously-engaged-on-craig-kimbrel.html He fills a need.  It would be nice just to have him in the bank.  We could pair him with Robertson, and have a really experienced back half of the bullpen.  It would get us through 162 with the potential of a Bautista September return, and a deadline deal for the playoffs.  It also frees Wells up for the open rotation spot.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...