Jump to content

Jim Baker and the hot forks of your inquisitiveness


DrungoHazewood

Recommended Posts

Jim Baker writes for Baseball Prospectus. He used to be one of Bill James' assistants back in the 80s.

He might be my favorite writer, he's one of those guys who seems to share my sense of humor 100%. Every chat he does on BP has me rolling on the floor.

Tell me this stuff isn't golden! You can't!

Jim Baker: Good evening. Sorry for the delay. I was ready, but my internet connection was not. It only does this at moments like this or when I'm trying to get a column finished upon deadline. Machines know more about us than they're letting on. They are plotting. For now, they are satisfied with creating small inconveniences. In time, they will work their way up to unleashing the end times. For now, though, let's talk some baseball.

gecko1 (Cupertino, CA): Will we soon have to rename the "Jody Reed Money Left on the Table" award after A-Rod?

Jim Baker: Let's get right to the Rod. No doubt, we will return to this topic many times tonight. I want everyone to take a moment and imagine Alex Rodriguez standing forlornly outside a spring training site. He'll be in a generic uniform with his hat on backwards so he can lean in closer to the fence to watch his former opponents and teammates working out. His glove will be tucked under his arm. One hand will be gripping the chain links of the fence the way people always seem to do when they're being kept out of something. There might be a tear of regret on his cheek

Mr. Blackwell (Wal-Mart Men's Dept.): Who has the worst uniform in baseball?

Jim Baker: I don't know, but I know this much: I used to love seeing the old pics of the New York Giants black uniform. "Why can't teams have black uniforms again?" I would ask strangers at bus depots and soup kitchens. Now that they all seem to have a black jersey and I'm sick of it. "Oooh -- black is so badass." And don't they always seem to wear them on the hottest days? When will the union step in and stop this black jersey madness? Won't somebody think of the children?

Billy Mumphrey (Lincoln, NE): How do you feel about team memorabilia that doesn't conform to team colors? I saw a royal blue Red Sox hat today, and it was kind of jarring.

Jim Baker: I've never understood that. The red Yankees cap? Huh? We need more order in the universe, not less. If elected, I will see to it that nothing ever changes and conformity remains the watchword of a carefully-constructed social order. Thank you.

Dave R (Quakertown, PA): Tonight at 7pm eastern time I listened to a surreal Grady Little/Dodgers GM conference call to announce his "resignation" (I'm sure it took several takes to explain the meaning of this word to Grady but he eventually got it and went along). The whole thing is pretty wild. The Dodgers were talking to Girardi and now Torre while they had a manager that, in theory, was given the opportunity to come back for 2008. Grady says he wanted out. Now Torre almost certainly will be given a 3 year contract there. Your thoughts?

Jim Baker: You know something I didn't know until this very minute? Grady is the brother of Bryan Little. Do you remember him? He either bunted or pretended to bunt on every single one of his 1,072 trips to the plate as a big leaguer. God, it was maddening!

Little should stop managing right now. He's got a career .552 winning percentage. That's pert near top 20. I think he realized that and up and quit. Had nothing to do with Torre.

Brian M (RI): Speaking of the once great braves, what about A-Rod to Atlanta, moving chipper to left and frenchy to CF or have I just been going insane because of all these red sox fans?

Jim Baker: See? You can do this with any team and it feels good, right?

One more question and then I have to soak my wrists in brine.

Billy (Ft. Lauderdale): Pick the 2008 world champion. Sox again? Will the Tigers be back in it?

Jim Baker: It's very hard not to pick the team that is two days removed from completing a sweep. I don't think I would have picked the '05 White Sox, but I would have certainly picked the '66 Orioles or the '63 Dodgers to repeat. Drew will have a better year next year and so will Lugo (only because he can't get worse). Pedroia and Ellsbury...you know where I'm going with this.

So, before the majority of the moves are made, they would have to be the favorite to repeat. This prediction is not binding and may be revoked by formal prospectus prior to April 1, 2008.

I'm not so sure about the Tigers at this juncture. Getting Magglio Ordonez and Curtis Granderson to repeat is going to be a trick. Will their rotation rebound? Too many questions at this juncture for me to be definitive.

Jim Baker: Thanks one and all for tuning in and poking my brain with the hot forks of your inquisitiveness. Enjoy the offseason to the best of your abilities.

I would write like that, but it would be like Deivi Cruz trying to hit like Barry Bonds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...