Jump to content

Jose Bautista is off to an incredible start


commish

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If only we had kept him and Werth. Think of the tons of threads we would have had last year on why we needed to trade them before they got cold.

Correct me if I'm wrong but we had Bautista so long ago that he wouldn't have even been under the O's control last year. He really is freaking amazing, though. I was absolutely sure last year was a fluke.. I saw him maybe hitting 30 homers again but he's on pace to blow that out of the water.

Really wish I was the guy who picked up Bautista off waivers in my fantasy league last year. Marked him as a keeper and guaranteed him Bautista in the last round this year. 50+ homers with your last pick, amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct me if I'm wrong but we had Bautista so long ago that he wouldn't have even been under the O's control last year. He really is freaking amazing, though. I was absolutely sure last year was a fluke.. I saw him maybe hitting 30 homers again but he's on pace to blow that out of the water.

Really wish I was the guy who picked up Bautista off waivers in my fantasy league last year. Marked him as a keeper and guaranteed him Bautista in the last round this year. 50+ homers with your last pick, amazing.

We picked him up as a Rule 5 in 2004 from Pittsburgh, he then went to Tampa, KC and the Mets (I don't think he ever got an AB in NY) and then back to Pittsburgh where he was until they traded him a year later to Toronto for a PTBML. What a tale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At some point folks are going to have to start talking about Toronto as one of the better front offices around. Some really great decisions over the past two years...

This is definitely true, but some other stuff I would write off more as luck than as a testament to AA's skill. That Wells dump was huge for Toronto, but unless AA sent in some black ops guys to drug Tony Reagins, I would chalk that up mostly to colossal stupidity on the part of the Angels front office. I mean even Bavasi's Bedard trade was semi-justifiable--they thought they were one arm away from contention. Reagins was out on the prowl looking to do something stupid and reactionary and AA was at the right place at the right time.

AA's handling of the draft, however, has been incredible. And obviously that Bautista extension is highway robbery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...