Jump to content

Beato throws 3 more scoreless innings


Frobby

Recommended Posts

1) It's 17 innings.

2) It's 17 innings with a leverage index well below 1.00, so it's almost all mopup work.

3) His walk rate of 1.6 per nine is half of his established level in the minors.

4) His K rate of 5.6 per nine is well below average for a reliever, but in line with his minor league resume.

5) His BABIP is a fantastically unsustainable .191.

6) In the minors, facing far inferior batters, he allowed a homer every 10 innings. So far with the Mets he's allowed none.

7) He's allowed four unearned runs.

Maybe Beato makes the O's look foolish in the long run. But I think it's just as likely that he allows 12 runs in his next 9 innings and folks go back to wondering when he's returned to Baltimore's system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add to what Drungo said, his swinging strike % is poor, as are his contact %s. Combine with the BABip and I think it's pretty clear he's getting some lucky contact. Being in mop up situations, it seems likely that he is getting some antsy hitters trying to hit 5-run homers instead of taking walks or waiting for good pitches.

His FIP is still great, while not zero, but that is based on his BB rate being so much lower than it normally is. If he keeps up a 1.6 rate then he'll be a pretty good reliever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) It's 17 innings.

2) It's 17 innings with a leverage index well below 1.00, so it's almost all mopup work.

3) His walk rate of 1.6 per nine is half of his established level in the minors.

4) His K rate of 5.6 per nine is well below average for a reliever, but in line with his minor league resume.

5) His BABIP is a fantastically unsustainable .191.

6) In the minors, facing far inferior batters, he allowed a homer every 10 innings. So far with the Mets he's allowed none.

7) He's allowed four unearned runs.

Maybe Beato makes the O's look foolish in the long run. But I think it's just as likely that he allows 12 runs in his next 9 innings and folks go back to wondering when he's returned to Baltimore's system.

To add to what Drungo said, his swinging strike % is poor, as are his contact %s. Combine with the BABip and I think it's pretty clear he's getting some lucky contact. Being in mop up situations, it seems likely that he is getting some antsy hitters trying to hit 5-run homers instead of taking walks or waiting for good pitches.

His FIP is still great, while not zero, but that is based on his BB rate being so much lower than it normally is. If he keeps up a 1.6 rate then he'll be a pretty good reliever.

All fair enough points. I wasn't trying to make the case that he's likely to have sustained success. I was just observing that he's been successful so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All fair enough points. I wasn't trying to make the case that he's likely to have sustained success. I was just observing that he's been successful so far.

Don't backtrack Rick. You said he's making the Orioles look foolish for not protecting him. That means you are expecting him to have sustained success or else why would the Orioles be foolish for not protecting him? Can't have it both ways my friend. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if he's going to make us look foolish or not but I do think the O's did a poor job of managing Beato's minor league career. While I recognize that starters are more valuable than relievers and it makes sense to give players a chance to cut it as a starter first, many of us were noting that Beato was languishing in that role for too long - and chewing up valuable service time

Perhaps more importantly, knowing that we had a decision to make on Beato this past offseason, I feel strongly that we should have pushed him to more advanced levels more quickly -- especially considering his pedigree.

The only "advantage" to having a poor MLB team like we did last year is that it gives the team a chance to audition players for the future. We really had nothing to lose. The MLB team was going nowhere. If he got blasted a few times, we've learned something and he's probably less attractive to other teams in the Rule 5. If he holds his own or better, we should work harder to find space for him (and we had the space).

I think we mismanaged this one even if he gets returned. It just didn't make sense. I hope we are looking ahead and push players for whom a decision is needed this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't backtrack Rick. You said he's making the Orioles look foolish for not protecting him. That means you are expecting him to have sustained success or else why would the Orioles be foolish for not protecting him? Can't have it both ways my friend. ;)

Hey, I said "he's making us look foolish for not protecting him so far." Look it up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, his earned run-less streak will continue for quite a while longer, as he's been placed on the DL. Elbow tendinitis, which is usually what's reported when all they know is it hurts too much to play, but nobody has any idea why.

Usually a DL stint for a Rule 5er is met with coughs and laughter, since it's often just cover for wanting a real player on the roster. But this looks legit, since he's been pitching pretty well and has been replaced with a retread journeyman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Generous? You are aware that multiple players have hit the 10M mark as an Arb 1 right?  
    • Its a low risk scenario, so we may grab someone to get a look at them in spring training, but I don't expect the Orioles to keep anyone on the roster. There just isn't space.  The bullpen may have a spot or two open, but several arms are lacking options and a Rule-5 guy wouldn't be able to be sent down. Elias (and most teams) like to have at least a spot or two that can be used to shuttle guys up and down in case of overwork. I don't see a guy worth taking a spot like that on a team that just won 101 games. 
    • Why not try and snag an arm in the rule 5?  Not glamorous enough?  What relievers are drafted/signed and turned to relievers before AA/AAA ball?  Ben Joyce?  So everyone is a failed SP. Either because of injury or performance. So why not take a flier on an arm when upper level pitching depth is a weakness of our org? We might never guess the player, but I think we can see that RH P is a need for us at the top of the system. The Yankees have a nasty bullpen. If they’ve been delaying converting a SP to a reliever then we should be all over that. That’s not being poor. That’s being smart, but we are poor. 
    • That’s a lot cheaper than the alternatives.  Matz has kind of been up and down and has never been an innings eater.   He finished real strong his last six starts but a lat strain ended his season.  In some ways he has Oriole written all over him.   The fact that he’s 32 and his career high in IP is 160 makes me question if he really is their kind of guy.
    • If the team decided that Wells had just reached his innings limit and we just shut him down last year then I think the opinion of Wells’ 2023 season as a SP would be much different.  We need a SP and a high leverage reliever for next year. What role is Wells in 2023?  What’s best for Wells and the team long term?  Is this decision going to be about Wells, or more based on what FA takes our offer?  Whether that be a reliever or SP. People just write off Wells as a #5, but at the ASB you could make an argument for Wells, or Bradish, as who was our best SP. Wells was leading the AL in WHIP. Wells showed last year that he can be at least a #3 type of SP. Everyone has known since we took him in the Rule 5 draft that it was going to take some time to build him up to even 150-160 IP. Ok, so big deal… that didn’t happen in year two, and his first year starting full time. I don’t think the org just gives up on him as a SP like a lot have. I think he could be an All Star Closer. He would be our 3rd closer in a row to do that. That’s a very valuable role for us. But give me the SP that only gave up more than 3 ER three times in his first 18 starts. 
    • Matz is owed 2yr/$25 million. There’s no way that we’re paying that let alone trading for it. Trading isn’t a bad idea and I think it’s on the table for us if need be. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...