Jump to content

New Maryland Head Coach: Mark Turgeon


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Agree......this hire is definitely more like a Edsel.

IMO, Anderson didn't miss the boat this time.....he sank it. And I have a sinking feeling that Maryland football and basketball are going to be painful to watch for a while. :(

I know what you mean. Between his successful track record and the ringing endorsements from most of the basketball community, all signs point to failure. MD should probably just eliminate the basketball program now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy with the hire, now I just want to know if we can keep Faust, Gibbs, and Stoglin.

I just spoke with Stoglin online. He said he's excited and actually was recruited by Turgeon at Texas A&M. Doesn't look like we have to worry about him going anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just spoke with Stoglin online. He said he's excited and actually was recruited by Turgeon at Texas A&M. Doesn't look like we have to worry about him going anywhere.

From what I've read, Turgeon seems like a guard-centric coach, so I would imagine that the guards should be pretty excited about his hiring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree......this hire is definitely more like a Edsel.

IMO, Anderson didn't miss the boat this time.....he sank it. And I have a sinking feeling that Maryland football and basketball are going to be painful to watch for a while. :(

You are the most negative hippie ever. Do you sit on your porch and complain about whippersnappers too? Lighten up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this guy is the type of coach we want:

  1. Program builder - so he should retain and build on Gary's work
  2. Seems to be a guy who does things 'the right way', which means he avoids violations. Yes, maybe this costs some recruits, but it keeps the pipelines flowing long term
  3. Hard working tenacious personality, the fan base expects no less after Gary

Concerns:

  1. Gotta recruit the locals better then Gary did. Hopefully the assistant coaches have enough connections to give in the start he needs
  2. Offense. Can a MD fan base tolerate teams scoring in the low 60's on a regular basis? Win or loss? Can you win in the ACC like this? And I mean, win it all, not just have 2011 FSU seasons now and then.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know what you mean. Between his successful track record and the ringing endorsements from most of the basketball community, all signs point to failure. MD should probably just eliminate the basketball program now.

Funny. I mean seriously, how is this a horrible signing? The guy has a great track record. I'll wait until I see his first few draft classes before getting too excited or to down on this hiring and at least four years before making any true opinions on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny. I mean seriously, how is this a horrible signing? The guy has a great track record. I'll wait until I see his first few draft classes before getting too excited or to down on this hiring and at least four years before making any true opinions on him.

Along those lines, Dave Telep of ESPN just mentioned the following on Twitter:

Mark Turgeon has already begun making calls to AAU and HS coaches.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One other thing to consider. If the Kansas job ever opens up, would Turgeon bolt for the Jayhawks if asked?

Probably. But Bill Self is still relatively young and is doing very well there. So I see no reason why that would be something to be concerned about in the near future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, I don't think Turgeon is going to win a NC every year, but what about this hire makes you think it will be "painful" to watch Maryland BB? What in his past as a coach would indicate that AT ALL? Some people are being silly.

I didn't follow A&M basketball at all, but it does seem that Turgeon preferred a very deliberate, slow-paced offense that usually produced scores in the 50's and 60's. As long as he's winning, I certainly wouldn't call it painful, but dull maybe. Of course he may have played that style simply to suit the talent he had there, and if (when) he's able to get better players at MD, he'll open it up much more. Hopefully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By all accounts this is a real smart, even brilliant, mind. With that said, my hope is he can gin up a faster-paced offense that Maryland is used to. Maybe he can adapt his scheme to fit the kind of talent he can hopefully acquire.

This has real strong potential here. I hope he fulfills every bit of potential it seems like he has for this gig. Like Edsall, there are a lot of disappointed fans. But Edsall is winning people over and I hope this guy does, too.

As for Anderson. One day he sits there and says he wants to play Navy every year, or make the football OOC schedule a lot better than it has been. Then he turns around and upsets everyone with an infuriating process of coaching searches. The guy is driving me nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't follow A&M basketball at all' date=' but it does seem that Turgeon preferred a very deliberate, slow-paced offense that usually produced scores in the 50's and 60's. As long as he's winning, I certainly wouldn't call it painful, but dull maybe. Of course he may have played that style simply to suit the talent he had there, and if (when) he's able to get better players at MD, he'll open it up much more. Hopefully.[/quote']

Turgeon wants to run, run, run. He's a Roy Williams disciple. The reason he slowed it down at A&M was because he had to in order to win. That was the personnel he had. Defensively he doesn't press a lot to try and speed up the game, but he wants to run after the rebound or even as the ball comes through the net.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
    • Paging @Tony-OH to the thread.  🤣 I've actually advocated for this in the minors forums...letting other teams draft and try to develop guys to see which have a shot of sticking and which don't.  Essentially let other teams make mistakes in the draft and trade for guys that are still in the lower levels in other systems but you think have a shot.  I do believe that's part of Elias's strategy....as risk adverse as he is, he's not going to take risks on drafting pitching if he views that's the biggest risk in the draft. All I'm saying it'd be nice to have a Skubal come through our system.  Does anyone really disagree with drafting and developing a Cy Young winner or is that something you guys aren't interested in?
    • Oh, I get that. I just think you'd be hard pressed to say year in and year out the Central is anything but a mediocre division.  Typically, the AL East has at least 3 strong teams, with some seasons where 4-5 of them have winning records or close to it.  But it doesn't matter. As said before, I've been saying for weeks prior to the end of the season that the Tigers were a very good team. I just wouldn't trade our org, team, farm, whatever for the Tigers. 
    • Does it matter if they get drafted and developed vs. traded for and developed? Hell, the O's starting rotation was a strength this year. Here's a breakdown of how it was constructed: Burnes - traded for (Elias) Suarez - free agent (Elias) Kremer - traded for (Duquette) Eflin - traded for (Elias) Grayson - drafted (Duquette) Bradish - traded for (Elias) Povich - traded for (Elias) Irvin - traded for (Elias) Tyler Wells - Rule V (Elias) Rogers - traded for (Elias) McDermott - traded for (Elias) Means - drafted (Duquette) I'm excluding Bowman being an opener and getting a starting credit.  But that said, out of all of the starters that the O's used this year, none were drafted by Elias, and only 2 were drafted by the O's (GRod, Means). 8 were acquired via trade (7 by Elias, 1 by Duquette), and 2 via FA or Rule V.  I don't necessarily think that Elias needs to draft starters to build a rotation, but it would be nice to see a couple make it before being traded, TBH.  That said, I don't think the above is sustainable, but the strategy would be sustainable if you have free agency play a bigger part. Look at the Royals. Their best 3 starters weren't drafted by them (Ragans - traded for, Wacha - FA, Lugo - FA). 
    • Unfortunately, it's looking like there is a lot of truth in that statement.  I believe Steve Bisciotti (Ravens owner) once said, he wanted to have a good team every year, get into the playoffs enough, eventually things go your way and win the Super Bowl.  This was in response to playing salary cap games for a few seasons and then eventually having to pay the piper with the dead money and being uncompetitive for a few years. Hopefully the O's can be consistently good and get hot at the end of the season and make a run through the playoffs.  Go back to June 1st and the five best teams in the league were the Orioles, Yankees, Guardians, Phillies and Dodgers.  Two are already out, Guardians fading fast with the Yankees and Dodgers still alive.   A Tigers - Mets World Series would be quite fitting.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...