Jump to content

Bundy or Starling?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
What would be interesting to me, is if Cole, Rendon, Hultzen are off the board; and the O's go with some else (not Bundy or Starling). I wonder how it would go over with the board, if the O's went with J.Bradley, Gray, Bauer, Anderson... or someone else?

It's so deep this year I wouldn't argue much with about 4-5 different people besides Bundy and Starling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tough to answer without having seen any video of Bundy. Just going by reports, I feel Bundy is actually the safer pick with less chance of bust. All things being equal, I'd prefer the position player here. I guess the brother angle is nice as well. If I felt better about Starling being a surer thing, I would have said Starling. I say Bundy as of now.

Here are some videos of Bundy

From MLB.com:

http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=14729855

From last year, courtesy of Baseballbeginnings.com:

http://baseballbeginnings.com/2010/07/12/dylan-bundy-video

Hitting a HR:

Workout Warrier (w/ brother Bobby) at age 14:

<iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/tP75ZTK5EcI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like both players a lot. However, Starling fills a void in our system and on our major league squad. We need impact bats more than anything! If you want to beat the Yanks and Red Sox you must have middle of the order bats.

Starling has that kind of talent potentially. You must take risks with these HS bats. Case in point Eric Hosmer. These are the kind of guys we need and don't currently have.

Machado and Starling in the 3,4 spots in the order down the road sounds awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is tough to answer without knowing them at all, not having seen them other than showcase games and video.

What projection does Bundy have left? Seems not much. I wonder what his medical charts look like. Just how much wear and tear has he had. Seems like we have been hearing about him for three years. Guys like that scare me a bit.

Starling is a risky pick because of the money he would need to leave football completely. Not a finished product, but with his football background and athleticism I would like to have the chance to take the risk.

No guarantees with either. I would rather have a star middle of the order type bat every day than a starting pitcher every fifth day, unless they are a true TOR starter (i.e. Halladay, Sabathia, Verlander). I can sometimes dream on tools....guilty. But I have seen too many starting pitchers around Bundy's height and build get hurt, or never get any better with stuff or command. I would take Bubba over Bundy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like both players a lot. However, Starling fills a void in our system and on our major league squad. We need impact bats more than anything! If you want to beat the Yanks and Red Sox you must have middle of the order bats.

Starling has that kind of talent potentially. You must take risks with these HS bats. Case in point Eric Hosmer. These are the kind of guys we need and don't currently have.

Machado and Starling in the 3,4 spots in the order down the road sounds awesome.

Been trying to avoid drawing a comparison, but Rowell filled a void in our system and was a top HS bat in his draft with less questions than Starling has. In fairness those questions are mostly whether he will sign and forgo football, which I hear isn't as hard to do with him as it was with say Tate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say Starling since we do not have an impact bat like that anywhere. Also we can spread the bonus over a few years since he is a two sport prospect and that could help us as take some chances later in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...