Jump to content

Cole - Injury Risk Like Strasburg


Recommended Posts

Rick Peterson seems to thinks so. He says any pitcher palm down when they land with on their front foot is putting tremendous stress on the arm.

http://nybaseballdigest.com/?p=35906

Not sure the science of this is good enough to take another pitcher over him but if you think, e.g., Bundy is close to Cole this may be a reason to take Bundy, assuming he doesn't have the same issue.

What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rick Peterson seems to thinks so. He says any pitcher palm down when they land with on their front foot is putting tremendous stress on the arm.

http://nybaseballdigest.com/?p=35906

Not sure the science of this is good enough to take another pitcher over him but if you thing, e.g., Bundy is close to Cole this may be a reason to take Bundy, assuming he doesn't have the same issue.

What do you think?

Yikes! The poor timing and obvious hyperabduction of the shoulder is putting his arm in a very functionally weak position. The talent is there though. If he can make it to the majors in a year or two, it might be worth it to get as much out of his arm before he goes down, assuming he does go down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Cole is as bad with that palm-down bit as someone like Mark Prior or Strasburg.

That said, the palm-down thing is a really good clear indicator of potential timing issues that lead to elbow stress. Which, from the picture provided, Cole doesn't really have, at least not anywhere near the same extent as a Prior or Strasburg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rick Petersen might be a quack or he might be a very respected pitching coach who knows a lot about mechanics. I have no idea how valid his theory is but it certainly is worth discussing and not dismissing out of hand. That is, unless you think the palm down means absolutely nothing.

You are just way off, as is the opening post. First and foremost, Cole doesn't "palm down". He is generally fully loaded and ready to start the second half of his arm circle through release. Are there instances where his mechanics slip out and his arm lags? I'm sure there are. But even that picture in the article shows a loaded arm.

If I see an comment from Petersen that indicates these issues are prevelant with Cole, maybe I'll reconsider (though I think that analysis is too broad to be of great utility). This article, however, is an author that heard Petersen speak and is now incorrectly applying Petersen's lesson to a picture that doesn't show the concerns Petersen generally harps against.

What should be discussed is why the author is incorrectly applying a theory that has no ties to Gerrit Cole's actual mechanics...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. The theory may be very sound (my initial reaction is that it is, but it is essentially an indicator of a problem rather than a problem itself), but it has no real application to Cole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are just way off, as is the opening post. First and foremost, Cole doesn't "palm down". He is generally fully loaded and ready to start the second half of his arm circle through release. Are there instances where his mechanics slip out and his arm lags? I'm sure there are. But even that picture in the article shows a loaded arm.

If I see an comment from Petersen that indicates these issues are prevelant with Cole, maybe I'll reconsider (though I think that analysis is too broad to be of great utility). This article, however, is an author that heard Petersen speak and is now incorrectly applying Petersen's lesson to a picture that doesn't show the concerns Petersen generally harps against.

What should be discussed is why the author is incorrectly applying a theory that has no ties to Gerrit Cole's actual mechanics...

From the video I've seen before, it always looked like Cole's arm action was borderline, but generally his timing seemed ok. I was most concerned before that his arm got too high above his shoulder and put it in a more functionally weak position. The picture here may be an extreme example of his arm slot out of whack, but I wouldn't not draft him over it. The potential for what he could offer in the original years under control is too much to pass up on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more Cole falls down draft boards, the happier I am. What if we snagged him? Matusz/Britton/Arrietta/Cole in 2013. Dear god.

Unfortunately, you can also say Yanks/Soxs/Rays/Jays in 2013. Not that it wouldn't be great to have that rotation, but would it amount to what we want in 2 years with the possibility of injury (macdonald & lowen), overhype (riley, cabrera), traded away (bedard), etc. That is why you take the best player available and if that is Cole you take him and not because of some potential great future rotation. Although it is always great to dream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, you can also say Yanks/Soxs/Rays/Jays in 2013. Not that it wouldn't be great to have that rotation, but would it amount to what we want in 2 years with the possibility of injury (macdonald & lowen), overhype (riley, cabrera), traded away (bedard), etc. That is why you take the best player available and if that is Cole you take him and not because of some potential great future rotation. Although it is always great to dream.

He's both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have heard that Cole, Hultzen or Bundy could all go #1. Rendon could go #2, but so could Starling if the Mariners wanted another hitter. I am pretty sure that 5 of Cole, Rendon, Starling, Hultzen, Bundy, Bauer and J Bradley will go in the top 5 of this draft, but two years ago most people had Hobgood as a #13-#20 overall type talent and the Orioles reached for him. You see it in almost every draft so I would bet there will be a shocker or two in the first 5-10 picks. I just hope the Orioles doesn't over think things and pick whoever is left out of the Cole, Hultzen, Bundy, Rendon and Starling group. I would be happy with anyone of those guys, but I hope that Bundy or Starling is the pick at #4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I’d say Tampa.    I don’t want to see Arozarena in a playoff series. Ever. He kills us and I’m sure he’d go off on a big stage.  Their pitching is really good.     
    • There's a new test called the S2 cognition test that is supposedly a better predictor of QB success rates than Wonderlic, which has a lot of high profile misses, Lamar included.  (Dan Marino, Jim Kelly, Steve McNair among others.)  S2 picked up on Brock Purdy being a possible diamond in the rough.  It started being taken around 2015, so its likely Lamar took it, but his score hasn't been publicized.   People made a big deal about it this past draft cycle because CJ Stroud did terribly on it apparenty.
    • The way I read this, anyone on the 40 man is eligible, even if they are in the minors. Then there are exceptions for players who aren't on the 40an. So yes, I am not expert in roster rules but I believe Grayson, Kjerstad etc could be optioned and still make the postseason roster as long as they stay on the 40 man roster.
    • If we’re just talking internal candidates then I think it’s pretty easy to put something accurate together. Personally, I don’t believe for a second that Holliday has a real chance at breaking OD. I think Urias at 3B, Henderson at SS, and Westburg at 2B is the most likely every day configuration if they’re not adding anyone significant from outside the organization.   If we start talking about potential moves for outside players then this gets a lot more dicey, but fun. Personally, I’d like to see two mid-rotation starters added. Give me something like Jordan Montgomery and Logan Gilbert. Tell me that a rotation of Rodriguez, Bradish, Montgomery, Gilbert, and Means is not one of the most balanced rotations in baseball. Insert similar names for the additions, I’m not particularly hung up on specifics right now. That’d push Wells and Kremer to the BP full time.  Id probably resign both Fuji and Hicks, if he’s interested. That leaves a bullpen with something like Cano, Fuji, Webb, Coulombe, Hall, Wells, Kremer, and Perez. I gotta agree about Bautista, unfortunately.    Big if, but if we are thinking that Holliday is a legit consideration then I’d be moving Urias. Mateo seems like a easy DFA. Ortiz can be the backup infielder. I may even consider moving Urias anyways and slotting Ortiz at SS until Holliday is ready.    Anyways, that’s really just an addition of a couple mid rotation starters (one through FA, one through trade), an okay bullpen addition, and possibly a veteran presence if Hicks is okay with a backup role in the OF. I don’t really feel the veteran presence is totally necessary, but judging by offseasons of the past, Elias finds it very necessary no matter how redundant the piece may be.    Also, there’s no room for all of Hays, Mullins, Santander, Cowser, Kjerstad, and Stowers. I’m thinking at least one of these OF guys can be part of the aforementioned trade for a mid rotation starter. Does something like Kjerstad, Basallo, and Urias get Gilbert? I dunno…getting too specific now. 
    • Adley’s going to reach base 250+ times this season.  Joe Mauer did that 4 times.  Mike Piazza did it twice. Johnny Bench once. Buster Posey never did.  Neither did Carlton Fisk, Gary Carter, Yadier Molina,  Jorge Posada or Ivan Rodriguez.  
    • That would certainly explain why O’Hearn is not allowed to hit against a LHP ever. 
    • I don’t think it will need to happen. I can see them DFA guys or just option guys they know won’t be on the postseason roster. Jorge Lopez is a perfect example of this.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...