Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A lot of people have Starling over Bundy, which I find interesting.

I understand that pitchers are generally risky because of the potential for major injury, but as far as who the more finished product is today, isn't that Bundy by a fair margin? Barring injury, isn't it more likely that he hits his upside or close to it than it is for the talented but somewhat raw athlete/hitter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Rendon-but he won't be there at #4

2) Cole- he probably is gone too

3) Starling- really love his potential but Jordan will pass unfortunately

4) Bundy- The guy I think we will get and I like a lot

This draft will be very interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My own personal preferences....

1. Rendon- won't fall to us but he is going to be a special hitter if stays healthy.

2. Bundy- I really have a good feeling about his potential as TOR starter down the road and I love the work ethic, brothers angle, etc.

3. Cole- would be more than happy but likely won't fall either.

4. Hultzen- have seen him at Charlottesville several times, excellent makeup, composure...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Cole (Nasty, FILTHY Stuff)

2. Bundy (Not the ideal power frame, but his repetoire and makeup, plus the family link bumps him for me)

3. Rendon (His plate discipline is outstanding, but having watched him this season at Rice, I just don't see the power. Not particularly speedy, and the injuries (ankle, shoulder) concern me. I'm much more down on him than most, and I've seen him play in person quite a few times. REALLY hope I'm eating crow in 2-3 years.

4. Starling (On pure upside potential: Safer pick, with legit upside for me is Jungman here)

Note: Very wary of Hultzen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Rendon

2. Cole

3. Gray

4. Jungmann

My four has changed. They hype is just too much. It is now:

1. Rendon

2. Cole

3. Bundy

4. Gray/Starling/Bauer/Hultzen/Bradley

Bundy just sounds like such a perfect high school prospect. I know he's not a college pitcher, and I know the risk associated with the difference, but damn he sounds good.

Jungmann's velocity last week worries me just enough to stay away. There's too much talent at the top of this draft to take a guy with a late and random red flag. Maybe it's nothing, but what if it is and there's no new medicals to show it?

I'm undecided between Gray, Starling, Bradley, Hultzen and Bauer at #4. The most exciting pick is Starling, followed pretty closely by A. Bradley. It's incredible that high school talent is shooting up this draft in the way it seems to be doing. Gray and Bauer are neck and neck to me. Each seems to pitch bigger than his size.

I'd still be happy with Hultzen as well, though I wouldn't love the pick. He seems like a guy who gets a team to the playoffs, but doesn't win in them because he doesn't overpower big hitters. Maybe that's not fair?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...