Jump to content

O's to take Archie Bradley? Nope, Dylan Bundy!


Recommended Posts

Scouts.com also had the O's taking Bradley.

But who did they have us taking 3 days ago?

Gotta watch around the boards today, now that this rumor is out there, some places will adjust based on that info so they look like they had it right. A lot of places Mock based on where they think a player is going to go, not where they should go. Hard to tell the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 712
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Good, bad, or indifferent: if you go against what the scouts say, either you or the scouts shouldn't be employed by the organization. They're paid to tell you who's the best pick.

This high of a pick the scouts really have little to no impact. This high of a first rounder is pretty much made by the top of the food chain and that's it. The further down the picks go, the more various input you'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This high of a pick the scouts really have little to no impact. This high of a first rounder is pretty much made by the top of the food chain and that's it. The further down the picks go, the more various input you'll see.

So you think, in a draft that's this close to the top, a GM will just ignore his scouts and go with what scouting services say?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone likes Bradley's upside over Hultzen. I think most people would take anyone in the discussion's upside over Hultzen.

Yep, but Hultzen's floor is WAAAAY higher. People call it "playing safe" but with most HS picks you have to have a little question IF they will ever make it to the majors, because they have so much developing left to do. With Hultzen, it's a question of when he gets there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you think, in a draft that's this close to the top, a GM will just ignore his scouts and go with what scouting services say?

No, a GM has mostly no input on this. It's the scouting director's decision. None of them listen to scouting services. As you move further into the draft they will start talking with their cross-checkers and area scouts, but at the top of the first round Jordan has seen them all in person and will make his own decision. Hence why he said the Hobgood pick was on him and him alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, but Hultzen's floor is WAAAAY higher. People call it "playing safe" but with most HS picks you have to have a little question IF they will ever make it to the majors, because they have so much developing left to do. With Hultzen, it's a question of when he gets there.

How does his floor compare to other college guys who also have a higher ceiling though (excluding Cole)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does his floor compare to other college guys who also have a higher ceiling though (excluding Cole)?

Archie Bradley? Well he could never develop a viable third pitch and end up a solid late reliever. He has three more seasons of development to hurt his arm before he reaches the age of college JR.s. Just about any first round (and also second and third round) arm is safer than Bradley. Hultzen is one of the safest in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, a GM has mostly no input on this. It's the scouting director's decision. None of them listen to scouting services. As you move further into the draft they will start talking with their cross-checkers and area scouts, but at the top of the first round Jordan has seen them all in person and will make his own decision. Hence why he said the Hobgood pick was on him and him alone.

Jordan is a scout, hence his title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles can't afford to pooch this pick and if one of Bundy, Starling or Rendon are there, you've got to take one of them.

Bradley is another Rich Stahl, Matt Hobgood, Adam Loewen etc. waiting to happen.

Based on Jordan's comments, I would think this Bradley thing is a smokescreen unless MacPhail stepped in.

How do you know Buck isn't having a heavy hand in this like you telling us earlier?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archie Bradley? Well he could never develop a viable third pitch and end up a solid late reliever. He has three more seasons of development to hurt his arm before he reaches the age of college JR.s. Just about any first round (and also second and third round) arm is safer than Bradley. Hultzen is one of the safest in the draft.

Sorry, I meant to ask if Hultzen's floor was so much higher than those of the other college arms to take the guy with the lowest ceiling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets put it this way, if there is a pick after us that signs for more than ours, then we'll know. I'm not talking about $50k.

Starling will likely sign for a LOT more than Hultzen. It's a completely plausible scenario that we take Hultzen before Starling is picked. So again, we won't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does his floor compare to other college guys who also have a higher ceiling though (excluding Cole)?

Floor could be what you see right now, which may never make it out of A ball. That's what is so hard about HS guys, you are taking them based on their potential which is sky high, but there is no guarantee they will ever develop. The further they have to go developmentally, the more risk, and Bradley needs to work on command, needs to develop a 3rd and 4th pitch, and needs to see how his velo is going to play based on a pro schedule. Lots of variables. Some of the college guys at the top could step into Frederick or Bowie right now, I'm not 100% convinced Bradley could pitch in Delmarva right now although I want to think he could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
    • I agree…just not sure the Os will feel that way.  
    • Yeah I can see Rivera at DH. That’s probably a better choice than Kjerstad against Skubal. I’d definitely go with Mullins and Cowser over Slater. Slater has been really bad against LH this year. Only a .543 OPS. He’s actually worse than Cowser against LH and slightly better than Mullins. 
    • Not that it matters, but for some reason I took a lot of heat for suggesting mid season that Basallo would end up #1. It’s all good. We don’t have to agree 100% on everything. 
    • I don’t think he’s gonna be a part of any playoff roster, but kudos for him to rehab all the way back just to be an option for us if needed.  Also, hopefully now he’s shaken the injury and can have a normal offseason and normal fall instructs.  He’s a dude that if he could just be another Dean Kremer, would be huge for this org. 
    • My guess is vs Skubal or Ragans, the Os will go with an IF of Gunnar, Westy, Mounty and Urias.  Rivera will DH. Santander starts in RF. Obviously one of Cowser or Mullins starts but do both of them start?  Would they start Slater? Lefties hit Ragans much better than righties do this year. Everyone is terrible vs Skubal although lefties are worse.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...