Jump to content

I think this winter (maybe sooner), it will be time to pick a direction


Frobby

Recommended Posts

I was just reading the Fielder thread, and as I was thinking about it, this winter (and maybe sooner) I think we need to get off this "middle course" we've been on. We've been trying, for years, to not go into total rebuild mode, but not get overcommitted to big time free agents, either. As I look at the other teams in our division, I just don't think it's going to work. I might have felt differently if BRob had been healthy the last two years, if Nick had blossomed into the star we all thought he would be, if Wieters was the offensive force he was projected to be, and/or if our pitching had really taken off. But those things have not happened, and even though this year's team appears to be a little better than in recent years, maybe even poised for a run at .500, it doesn't look like a team that is going to mature into a contender over the next couple of years, unless there is a major infusion of talent.

I'm sure SG will say this has been obvious all along. Well, I don't think it had to turn out this way, for the reasons I listed. But simply put, our "core" doesn't appear to be that good. Not as good as I hoped, anyway.

So, I think we need to start trading for younger guys and/or positioning ourselves to get a lot of draft picks, or we need to start spending up the wazoo on big name free agents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Why do all your posts have to have some T-shirt in them? I don't get it.

Its his idea of a signature I think...Not allowed and I know Paul has said something to him about it...Its pretty annoying.

As for the OP, it has been obvious for a while the Orioles were not heading into the proper direction in terms of this team and this division.

Again, the MAJOR LEAGUE foundation/core is/was in place...But we simply do not have the owner/GM combo needed to win in this division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that we probably should look to head in one direction or another this winter, but I just don't see it happening. I think they'll resign Hardy, and let Lee and Vlad walk without offering arb (even if they're Type B) and just do the same thing again next year. I don't see Angelos changing paths, since we've been doing basically the same thing for 14 years. I think that he thinks that the O's are going to give him one good year doing it this way and he ain't changing until they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its his idea of a signature I think...Not allowed and I know Paul has said something to him about it...Its pretty annoying.

As for the OP, it has been obvious for a while the Orioles were not heading into the proper direction in terms of this team and this division.

Again, the MAJOR LEAGUE foundation/core is/was in place...But we simply do not have the owner/GM combo needed to win in this division.

What level of payroll could the O's reasonably afford if attendance climbed back to the 3 million mark?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're closer to another rebuild than contention. The core is mediocre. We developed some guys who would be OK bottom of the order hitters and mid-to-back of the rotation pitchers. But they are nowhere close to a core that will take a team to the playoffs.

But all of this is just talk. While Angelos is the owner and MacPhail is the GM, we won't take any major steps toward contention, whether it is through spending on free agents or investing in the minor league system, or a REAL rebuilding process. MacPhail traded 2 players in Bedard and Tejada. That was the extent of our rebuild.

There's a reason we've been the same team for 13 years. And as long as these people are in place, it will continue to be that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll say it so that it's not just SG. It's been obvious all along. While I think the organization is significantly healthier than it was a few years ago despite the falling live attendance, the O's once again have to look at what to do over the next few years knowing they didn't do everything they needed to do the last few years to set themselves up. They strived for good and hoped for great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that we probably should look to head in one direction or another this winter, but I just don't see it happening. I think they'll resign Hardy, and let Lee and Vlad walk without offering arb (even if they're Type B) and just do the same thing again next year. I don't see Angelos changing paths, since we've been doing basically the same thing for 14 years. I think that he thinks that the O's are going to give him one good year doing it this way and he ain't changing until they do.

Couple reasons to hope for change:

1. Buck

2. Realization that the current core isn't quite what we hoped

3. It's clearer than ever that NY, Boston, Toronto and Tampa aren't cycling down. Our success will be based on doing something new - not just waiting them out.

4. Cal is coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, the MAJOR LEAGUE foundation/core is/was in place...But we simply do not have the owner/GM combo needed to win in this division.

Well...the regression of Nick and the absence of Roberts really highlights this. If both of these guys were performing at career average levels I don't think this would bother us as much. But their quick aging really reshapes our approach to the contracts we have to be willing to give out.

It's not really true to say our core is in place if Roberts barely plays this year and next and Markakis continues to slump. That really only leaves Jones/Wieters to sustain us in our core, and while they may be in the roster it's certainly not getting the job done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's still unrealized upside with a lot of our core: Britton/Matusz/Arrieta/Jones/Wieters. These are the guys we need to keep, everyone else is expendable, IMO, to bring as much young talent as possible that can be here right around 2014/2015 when the next wave is here: Bundy/Machado/Schoop/Esposito.

I hope Buck's in it for the long haul and wouldn't want to leave if we took that direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure SG will say this has been obvious all along. Well, I don't think it had to turn out this way, for the reasons I listed. But simply put, our "core" doesn't appear to be that good. Not as good as I hoped, anyway.

So, I think we need to start trading for younger guys and/or positioning ourselves to get a lot of draft picks, or we need to start spending up the wazoo on big name free agents.

The rebuild has not been a slam dunk, but it's not a failure either. The real problems have been:

- Roberts injury problems

- Nick's incredible regression

- Failure of "plug-in" free agents to perform

The young core has been fine. Britton, Matusz are what we thought they were. Arrieta is a rotation piece. Jones is breaking out this year, and I think you can kind of argue that for Wieters as well. Reimold is playing well. I think we have a competitive left side of the infield for the first time in 6-7 years.

I firmly believe if you put a top talent at 1B (like Fielder or, miraculously, Puljos), and find at least a competent 2B, you can put a team that can compete for the playoffs in 2012-13. ESPECIALLY considering the possibility of wild card expansion.

I just don't believe doing an all-out rebuild is a very successful strategy. I can only think of one team it works consistently for, and that's the Marlins. A better path is putting the best product you can on the Major League field and adding/subtracting where needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rebuild has not been a slam dunk, but it's not a failure either. The real problems have been:

- Roberts injury problems

- Nick's incredible regression

- Failure of "plug-in" free agents to perform

The young core has been fine. Britton, Matusz are what we thought they were. Arrieta is a rotation piece. Jones is breaking out this year, and I think you can kind of argue that for Wieters as well. Reimold is playing well. I think we have a competitive left side of the infield for the first time in 6-7 years.

I firmly believe if you put a top talent at 1B (like Fielder or, miraculously, Puljos), and find at least a competent 2B, you can put a team that can compete for the playoffs in 2012-13. ESPECIALLY considering the possibility of wild card expansion.

I just don't believe doing an all-out rebuild is a very successful strategy. I can only think of one team it works consistently for, and that's the Marlins. A better path is putting the best product you can on the Major League field and adding/subtracting where needed.

You don't have to keep rebuilding. You have to keep developing players or finding talent through trades, internationally, etc. And that is something the Orioles are horrible doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • Up 550,000.  I’d hardly call that awful.  You can’t lose 100+ games three times in four years and have a pandemic in the other and expect to recoup all your attendance from the last time you were a playoff team in two years.  
    • We have gone over this repeatedly. Hicks' salary through 2025 is locked in based on his contract with the Yankees. Unless someone wants to pay him more than the 9.5M per year his Yankee contract will pay, he will simply sign for the minimum and the remainder of the 9.5M per year will be paid by the Yankees.
    • I mean I do agree with the many people who say here that if Cowser or Kjerstad or some other hitter emerges as good or better than Santander, then yes of course it makes sense to trade him.   But I just don't trust prospect rankings.  Don't assume a player will be as good as high as he ranked until he proves it over a period of time.  In 2016 Jorge Mateo was the Yankees top prospect, just ahead of Aaron Judge -- just to name one example.  For this reason I think Santander hangs around a little awhile -- unless the O's trade for or sign a replacement outfield bat prior to the season -- in addition to trading Santander.  
    • But the Rays did lock up some of their best hitters -- mainly Evan Longoria and Wander Franco.  I know Santander is not at that level, but I think there's a good chance Santander is with the team to start next season.  I think it's a mistake to assume someone is ready to take over for him until he proves it.  If not then trade for or sign someone who is -- if he must be traded now or pretty soon.  I don't trust prospect rankings.  In 2016 Jorge Mateo was the Yankees top prospect, just ahead of Aaron Judge.   Also, the Orioles don't really have the pitching in the minors the way the Rays always seem to.  Can't imagine Means or any decent pitcher getting traded for that reason.  And for a long time the Rays weren't a very good hitting team, which I think is a big reason the Rays never tried to lock up their position players until guys like Evan Longoria started to emerge, though there may be a bit more to it than that.  
    • 49ers QB Brock Purdy had UCL repair with InternalBrace. Here’a a summary comparing the two. I’m sure Bautista and his medical team will closely consider the best course for his circumstance.    https://www.armoredheat.com/armored-heat-blog/tommy-john-vs-ucl-repair
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...