Jump to content

Nationals Manager Riggleman resigns because of contract


sbauer

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't know I see this as pretty badass. I am 100% a believer in commitment and honoring commitments but who here hasn't left a job? There's probably a lot more to this (and it seems like there is) but even at face value who am I to judge? Face value: He was honest about what he wanted and they were honest about what they wanted and the two didn't match up so he left. I mean, I've done that.."dear employer, I would like this, this, and this I want my role to be ___" and if it doesn't happen you leave. How is this different?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know I see this as pretty badass. I am 100% a believer in commitment and honoring commitments but who here hasn't left a job? There's probably a lot more to this (and it seems like there is) but even at face value who am I to judge? Face value: He was honest about what he wanted and they were honest about what they wanted and the two didn't match up so he left. I mean, I've done that.."dear employer, I would like this, this, and this I want my role to be ___" and if it doesn't happen you leave. How is this different?

He didn't just leave his job. He turned his back on the players. That is unforgivable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He didn't just leave his job. He turned his back on the players. That is unforgivable.

I mean, I guess, in our world....we hold these people up to such a high standard. If you're involved in baseball we treat you like a saint, we make these lofty standards..compare it to a regular job and see if you can make the same assessment. I understand the commitment, he signed a year long contract to be a Manager, but from the sounds of it, he doesn't seem to have a whole lot of control over what players are on his team...and even if he did, hes looking for a certain contract. The franchise said to him that he wasn't worth an extension and he responded by saying he will no longer be the manager...I think its pretty fair.

We can hold them all up on some pedestal, but at the end of the day this is their job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This makes no sense. At some point all contracts have a cut off date. If you extend him for two years in two years you have another season with a drop dead date. Is he going to demand that his contract be extended before he plays that last season? Must he always be signed up for the season after the current one? It is dumb. It logically makes no sense.

He should of waited till the end of the year and if they wanted him back ask for a three year deal then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading up on this it seems he wanted some authority to dominate the players more. That some of them seemed to not respect him because they thought he was out the door perhaps. He wanted them to realize he was there for a while. The management didnt want to give him that comfort.

Regardless.

He has to play it out. Has to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone describe what this is? It's blocked at work and I'm curious now.

He is at a bar drinking with two very young ladies. Dont know when it was taken. Perhaps last night after he quit he went out for some adult beverages. Just kinda funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boswell's column:

Jim Riggleman called General Manager Mike Rizzo 45 minutes before Thursday afternoon’s game and asked for a meeting. Minutes later, Riggleman told his boss that he wasn’t getting on the team bus after the game unless Rizzo agreed to have a meeting with him in Chicago to discuss picking up his contract option to manage in 2012.

Riggleman says he just “wanted to have a conversation in Chicago” on the subject. Rizzo says it was an ultimatum. It’s a distinction without any difference whatsoever. The only words that mattered are, “I’m not going to Chicago unless . . .”

Not getting on the bus? Not getting on the plane? Talk turkey or I quit? In three hours? Try that with your boss. Give me $700,000 for next year or I’ll resign in the middle of a long winning streak and say I didn’t get proper respect and fair treatment.

In Rizzo, Riggleman couldn’t have found a worse boss to nag about a new deal or one who would respond worse to his lobbying in the media (me included) for help.

Why? Because Rizzo faced the same obstacles when he became GM. Instead of whining about a longer deal, he did such a strong job that the Nats did what was obvious: They gave him a five-year contract. Rizzo replaced Jim Bowden on an interim basis in 2009. Then, the next year, he was on a short leash like Riggleman this year.

Rizzo said ex-president “Stan Kasten told me, ‘Forget the [expletive] contract. Own the job. Just be the [expletive] GM. Prove you’re the guy.’ ”

And Rizzo, even though he’d spent his whole life working up the baseball chain to be a GM, swallowed and did it. Talk about playing the wrong card with the wrong guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One BIG difference between the two situations.

Speaking of Davey, sounds like he'll take the job if it's offered to him.

Davey and two Bob's formerly managed and are with the Nats' front orifice....also odd that his interim replacement was replaced by Rigs in Seattle when he was fired ....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nationals/nationals-put-john-mclaren-in-charge-for-now-but-plan-on-finding-another-interim-replacement/2011/06/23/AG6yzHiH_story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...