Jump to content

Aberdeen stinks, again!


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Hang in there. Maybe you will get some recent draft signees soon.

Yes you will. Mike Wright, Matt Taylor and Devin Jones have been assigned while Sam Tavares, James Brandhorst, Cody Young and Brandon Holloway were released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What questions does it raise? Wouldn't just be easier to look at the draft over the last two or three years and look at them. Aberdeen's record doesn't necesarily mean we've drafted poorly. We have guys from the 2009 draft, 2010 draft, and hardly any from this year's draft on the team. Which picks do you have a problem with?

BTW, I'd be curious to know how the Ironbirds stack up age wise to the other teams. Sawyer, Narron, and Bridwell are still teenagers. Wirsch and Baker are just 20. Our best prospects on the team are the youngest ones.

Sam Tavares, James Brandhorst, Cody Young and Brandon Holloway.

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me like Baltimore really sees Aberdeen as a "developmental" stage. Almost like an extended spring training, except that people actually keep track of the stats and standings. It just seems like they send guys there just to get their feet wet and get some experience, and that winning games there really is even less of a priority than it is elsewhere in the minors.

I'm sure there are others who have better information than I do, but that's sort of how I see things from a distance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aberdeen certainly does stink, you're right about that. I think much has to do with the slower than usual rate of signing new draftees and getting them on the field. I believe that as of today, only two 2011 draftees have actually played for Aberdeen. Davis has six at bats and Howard has logged one inning. It would be nice to gauge some of our 2011 class this season through Aberdeen. Hopefully, the recent signings will get new, more talented guys there and let Aberdeen shed some of the dead weight, like they did yesterday.

There are a few other reasons for the poor record as well:

1) Anyone good from Aberdeen last year was promoted. In fact, the only regular from last year's squad is Knight and he's been as bad this year as last year. This leaves several ho-hum players getting more ABs than they should until this year's crop is signed. Read: Leonora, Knight, Clinton, Goolsby, Hoppy, Petersime, etc).

2) Bluefield was terrible last year and much of the best talent from there (Schoop, Machado, Petrini, Pettit, Martin, even Ohlman and Webb) and from the GCL (Berry) bypassed Aberdeen this seasonfor full season teams.

3) Our best talent at Aberdeen is young. We have six top-10 draft pick there from previous years right now (Sawyer, Givens, Narron, Wirsch, Bridwell, and Cowan). All of these guys except for Cowan were playing HIGH SCHOOL ball just two years ago. I think we need to remember that. Contrary to the draft strategy this year, in 2010 and 2009 we drafted a lot of high schoolers early.

4) The Orioles have been aggressive in promoting these young player, even when the situation may not warrant it. For example, Narron had a ~400 OPS last year in the GCL (limited ABs, I realize) and now he's a struggling 19 year old at Aberdeen with a ~550 OPS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have tried to watch most of their home games online when I get the chance. Seems like they are really having trouble getting the needed hits at the right time. Not sure if that should be blamed on age or not, or just bad luck maybe. It seems every time I watch at least a few times a game they have a runner in scoring position with no one out or one out. Just can't seem to get the big hit at the right time. I feel for the most part the starting pitching has been decent. Not a lot of run support, but looking beyond that they seem to be pitching well. The bullpen situation hasn't been very fun to watch. I almost feel like I'm watching my Texas Rangers when I watch Aberdeen. I sure hope they can get it turned around and start getting some wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fear not the cavalry, part deux is coming!

"Right-handers Matt Hobgood and Ryan Berry are expected to pitch one more time for the Gulf Coast League O's, probably July 11, and then move to Aberdeen."

http://www.masnsports.com/steve_melewski/2011/07/hobgood-and-berry-will-likely-be-aberdeen-bound-soon.html

I hope Hobgood doesn't steal my Rip's BBQ sandwich!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aberdeen certainly does stink, you're right about that. I think much has to do with the slower than usual rate of signing new draftees and getting them on the field. I believe that as of today, only two 2011 draftees have actually played for Aberdeen. Davis has six at bats and Howard has logged one inning. It would be nice to gauge some of our 2011 class this season through Aberdeen. Hopefully, the recent signings will get new, more talented guys there and let Aberdeen shed some of the dead weight, like they did yesterday.

There are a few other reasons for the poor record as well:

1) Anyone good from Aberdeen last year was promoted. In fact, the only regular from last year's squad is Knight and he's been as bad this year as last year. This leaves several ho-hum players getting more ABs than they should until this year's crop is signed. Read: Leonora, Knight, Clinton, Goolsby, Hoppy, Petersime, etc).

2) Bluefield was terrible last year and much of the best talent from there (Schoop, Machado, Petrini, Pettit, Martin, even Ohlman and Webb) and from the GCL (Berry) bypassed Aberdeen this seasonfor full season teams.

3) Our best talent at Aberdeen is young. We have six top-10 draft pick there from previous years right now (Sawyer, Givens, Narron, Wirsch, Bridwell, and Cowan). All of these guys except for Cowan were playing HIGH SCHOOL ball just two years ago. I think we need to remember that. Contrary to the draft strategy this year, in 2010 and 2009 we drafted a lot of high schoolers early.

4) The Orioles have been aggressive in promoting these young player, even when the situation may not warrant it. For example, Narron had a ~400 OPS last year in the GCL (limited ABs, I realize) and now he's a struggling 19 year old at Aberdeen with a ~550 OPS.

Other than #4, which is an organizational philosophy issue, don't all ML organizations face the same sort of issues when it comes to short-season A leagues? The teams the IronBirds are obviously not having as much trouble as Aberdeen is. And they probably all face situations where their best players from 2010 were promoted, few 2011 draftees have signed, and they have lots of high school guys only 1-2 years out.

Moreover, Frobby posted the records going all the way back to 2005. They've had one winning season out of six.

I think Frobby's questions are worth asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

College players that log time at short season A ball are guys that sign early, and thus are not overslot. Non-college players at short season A ball are generally upside high schoolers that signed in a previous year and international signees who have logged time at rookie ball. Baltimore has lacked early "slot" signing college players (think supplemental and 2nd round picks) and as we all know are generally barren of international talent. That means Baltimore is missing out on two primary sources of talent that would generally be found on a short season club. If Baltimore were bringing in an extra supplemental/2nd round college talent each year, as well as promoting an extra 2-3 international talents and an extra high school signing from the previous year, they'd have a stronger club at Aberdeen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...