Jump to content

Deadspin 100 Worst Baseball Players Of All Time


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

Ponson and the great Manny Alexander are in part 2. I sort of wish Alexander was around today so we could see posts about him having "some pop" at the plate when Hardy or Roberts are hurt. Tony Muser is at 95, hell hes better than some of the guys we've had at first in the past decade :)

93. Drungo Hazewood, 1980 (Orioles)

In spring training 1980, Drungo LaRue Hazewood was batting .583 for the Baltimore Orioles when he was demoted by manager Earl Weaver. Hazewood, then 20 years old, was a former No. 1 pick and already a successful minor leaguer. In 1979 he hit 21 home runs and got on base at a .378 clip in AA ball. "I've never cut a guy hitting that high before," said Weaver, "but he was making the rest of us look bad with that average." Hazewood never recovered. He came up for a bitter cup of coffee in September of 1980, striking out four times in six plate appearances —then spent three anonymous seasons hitting home runs, reaching base at high rates, and stealing bases in the minors before finally leaving baseball after 1983. In his short big league stint, Hazewood was terrible. But blame his presence on this list on Earl Weaver. And Ken Singleton, who gave Weaver incentive to find a room for a young right fielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

The ironic thing about Steve "Bye Bye" Balboni is that when he was on the biggest stage of his baseball career in the 1985 World Series, he batted .320 with an OBP of .433, going 8-for-25 with 5 walks ............ And his 8 hits ??? ALL SINGLES. :eek:

It was the complete antithesis of what he was for the rest of his entire career (lots of home runs and extra base hits, low batting average, low OBP).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's where I insert the observation I make about all of these lists: The title should be "The 100 Worst Baseball Players of All Time Selected From The Top 0.001% of All Baseball Players In the World When They Were Active."

Put a 25-year-old Mario Mendoza in your local adult men's baseball league and he'd win the triple crown and the Gold Glove and the MVP award and hit .675. And for good measure he might be the best pitcher in the league. He was probably the best player on almost every team he played on from age 5 to age 18.

And the list is no good anyway. By #3 you can tell it's all screwed up. Fred Merkle as the 3rd-worst player of all time? He had six years where he was at least an average MLB regular, he had a career value of almost 15 WAR, and was getting meaningful at bats in the majors under John McGraw before he turned 20. He's probably not among the 10000 worst major leaguers of all time.

The rest of the list seems populated with a good number of good or even very good players with one outstanding weakness or even one big mistake. I didn't get all the way through, but I'd assume they think the ball that went through Bill Buckner's legs was more than enough to counter his 2800 or so career hits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found Curt Blefary being on the list rather hilarious, mainly because half the time when I think of him I think of Oldfan#5 ranting about some incredible play that Blefary made that he never actually saw.

Thompson saw a play, described it, OldFan's grandfather heard the call on the radio, told OldFan about it much later, OldFan tells us about it decades later. That kinda airtight anecdotal evidence is good enough to convince me Blefary's reputation was undeserved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thompson saw a play, described it, OldFan's grandfather heard the call on the radio, told OldFan about it much later, OldFan tells us about it decades later. That kinda airtight anecdotal evidence is good enough to convince me Blefary's reputation was undeserved.

As we know from UZR discussions, the best way to characterize someone's defensive ability is to be fartherest removed from actually paying attention to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's where I insert the observation I make about all of these lists: The title should be "The 100 Worst Baseball Players of All Time Selected From The Top 0.001% of All Baseball Players In the World When They Were Active."

Put a 25-year-old Mario Mendoza in your local adult men's baseball league and he'd win the triple crown and the Gold Glove and the MVP award and hit .675. And for good measure he might be the best pitcher in the league. He was probably the best player on almost every team he played on from age 5 to age 18.

And the list is no good anyway. By #3 you can tell it's all screwed up. Fred Merkle as the 3rd-worst player of all time? He had six years where he was at least an average MLB regular, he had a career value of almost 15 WAR, and was getting meaningful at bats in the majors under John McGraw before he turned 20. He's probably not among the 10000 worst major leaguers of all time.

The rest of the list seems populated with a good number of good or even very good players with one outstanding weakness or even one big mistake. I didn't get all the way through, but I'd assume they think the ball that went through Bill Buckner's legs was more than enough to counter his 2800 or so career hits.

Yes, yes, we know, heck Deadspin knows it would be why they said this at the start of the piece

But by worst 100 baseball players I don't just mean the objective worst, the statistical worst, the most physically discomforting to watch. I mean the players whose failure was enduring, endearing, perplexing,and spectacular. It's easy to identify bad players—sabermetrics has made a truly effective science of it—and it's easy to name cup-of-coffee guys who never had the ability, physical or mental, to stick in the major leagues. But a list like that might mean leaving out guys like Jose Lima, Ray Oyler, or the Rev. Aloysius Stanislaus Travers. In other words, while Rafael Belliard does appear below, nobody wants to read about 100 versions of him.

It was an entertainment piece, pure and simple. Sorry you didn't find it entertaining but you probably should have known better then to click the link if you were going to take it that seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Growing up in the south, I was a big fan of Rafael Belliard. He couldn't hit anything, but I remember him being a defensive wizard (though backup to Jeff Blauser). I don't know what advanced metrics would say, but as a kid that played SS I loved watching him play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • The at-bat by Cowser may have been the worst at bat I've ever seen given the moment. He made his mind up he was swinging before the pitcher even released the ball. Struck out swinging on a pitch that hit him with the bases loaded and broke his hand all on the same play.
    • I'm totally comfortable calling a team that has won 192 regular season wins and has an 0-5 playoff record an epic failure. The team had a superior record to the Rangers last year. They just got swept at home to a team that was 4-9 down the stretch. Do you believe the those two teams had a better team? I don't. If that isn't an epic failure, what is it to you?
    • Just because the players like him and each other doesn’t necessarily mean the culture is good though. They definitely loved each other in that clubhouse, but does a very talented team with a strong culture go winless in their 5 most important games over the last 2 seasons? Or completely unravel in seemingly every pressure situation? I would argue no. After calming down a bit from the disappointment of the last 3 months, I feel pretty indifferent towards Hyde. If he’s gone, I think it’s because the team just mentally broke at some point and never recovered, and bringing in someone new would likely be a kick in the ass that their play got their well liked manager fired. If he’s back, I don’t have any concerns with him. 
    • This doesn’t surprise me in the least. Classic “CYA” by these clowns. They’ll announce Adley was injured and crow on and on about how we’re getting guys back next year and they’ll look to “enhance” the roster. YAWN.
    • 8M is a bit expensive for that HR rate.  Interested to see what they do there, unless folks think it is obvious he will not be retained.
    • They need 1 top end RP, one top end SP, a depth SP option, and a righty that can mash lefties.  Should be doable but pitching will be expensive.  Would also be nice to see extensions for some of the core and investment in upgrades to the stadium.  From an organizational standpoint, really need to start seeing some benefits at the MLB level from the international player development side of things.
    • This really sums it up. I thought Waltimore was a good idea, but then they constructed the lineup with a bunch of LHH that can't hit lefties well enough to take advantage of RF. And the RHH bats were neutralized because they are largely pull guys that don't have a consistent ability to slap oppo and they didn't have consistent enough super strength to take it over Waltimore.  So while Waltimore did help neutralize opposing offenses, in the process it did the same to the O's and teams with LHPs in rotations or the bullpen could easily take down the O's.  I do wonder if they split the gap and maybe bring the wall in 15-20 feet, but still keep the height.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...