Jump to content

At what point was it clear to you MacPhail was not "the guy?"


JTrea81

Recommended Posts

I was just curious when some reached their breaking point with Andy MacPhail (for those that have of course).

Mine's easy as most everybody knows the Tex fiasco pretty much sealed it for me as it did for others, but a very small group knew it from the beginning, while others seem to have had this year's results finally be the last straw.

So when did you determine that he's not the guy and needed to be replaced?

What was that move or non-move that did it or was it just a combination of things?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I started to have my doubts when he went a year in between the Bedard deal and the Pie trade/Nick extension time period without doing anything to help the team in any kind of significant way.

People bashed me for saying that but you just can't go that long without making major improvements on a crappy team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think at the time he was the best man for the job. Angelos had never really turned the keys over to the team to a GM in quite a long time. At least with MacPhail I believe he had most of the say in what was going on with the team. If I have a choice of a figurehead GM that really has no say and has to get everything approved through Angelos and a GM that has experience and the trust of the owner I will take the second scenario every time.

The problem stems from having a GM that is very conservative and a team that is in need of an out of the box thinker. I am just not sure our owner is going to trust any other individual to come in and make bold moves.

This is why we all can sit here and complain about Macphail but the alternative may be much worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When he noted that we are not aggressively, or even to the same level as our competition, pursuing International talent. Combined with not being able to develop talent that was drafted. Could he still turn it around? Only if the big three young pitchers become a force next year and we acquire at least 1 impact bat. Too many what ifs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When he noted that we are not aggressively, or even to the same level as our competition, pursuing International talent. Combined with not being able to develop talent that was drafted. Could he still turn it around? Only if the big three young pitchers become a force next year and we acquire at least 1 impact bat. Too many what ifs.

Same here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Such a silly conclusion. As was said, there's no way to tell whether he's 'the guy' or not so long as PA is in charge.
I agree with this...but I think there are certain things that get done that has nothing to do with PA.

Hard for me to believe that PA even knew who Atkins, Gregg and Gonzalez were, much less telling AM to sign them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the last few years have taught me anything it's that we will never win with Angelos. MacPhail wasn't spectacular by any means but I don't particularly think there was any man who could have gotten the job done with Pete still calling the shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with this...but I think there are certain things that get done that has nothing to do with PA.

Hard for me to believe that PA even knew who Atkins, Gregg and Gonzalez were, much less telling AM to sign them.

True that he likely doesn't know who these specific players are, but if AM is given the directive to add veterans at positions of weakness, and a limited budget to do so, there are only so many directions he can go in.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started to have my doubts when he went a year in between the Bedard deal and the Pie trade/Nick extension time period without doing anything to help the team in any kind of significant way.

People bashed me for saying that but you just can't go that long without making major improvements on a crappy team.

This was when I started to have my concerns as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure that MacPhail is not "the guy".

I think Connor messed up the pitching staff. He is clearly Buck's problem.

I think injuries have been a problem and if MacPhail is held to a budget by PA their may not be enough money to get the kind of backup players that Boston or New York would have. So is it MacPhail's fault that the budget has to balance with revenues. The responsible lies somewhere between PA and MacPhail but I don't know where. I doubt that changing GM's helps that problem and could make it worse if PA ends up not trusting the new GM.

Non performance of the FA's. Yes, MacPhail has a responsible here, but when 72% of the Hangout think he did a good job this winter it hard to say he picked the wrong players and have any credibility in making the comment.

I'd like to see a better solution, but change or the sake of change does appear to be the right move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Glad to see that Manny’s Padres are likely to get in now.  With Tatis out and Soto being a huge disappointment, Manny has really carried that team.  When you look at what he has meant to that team, he deserves serious MVP consideration, though I suspect Goldschmidt will win based on gaudier offensive numbers.   Goldie has a much stronger supporting cast though.  Manny’s been doing it all by himself.  
    • We had a 9-8 season series lead on Tampa and ended up losing the season series 10-9, losing the final two. We had a 9-7 season series lead on Boston and ended up losing the season series 10-9, losing the final three. We had a 6-2 season series lead on Toronto and have allowed it to get to 8-8.   We’ll lose that season series unless we win 2 of the final three. New York?  Different story, they’ve kick our butts all year.   We easily could have won the season series with Tampa, Boston and Toronto and have squandered the first two.  Boston in particular really  irritated me.   Losing the season series to Toronto after dominating them early would really add insult to injury. 
    • Yeah, it's hard for me to complain about a handful of winnable games in a season full of surprises. I never thought they would be a playoff team even when they were tied, or maybe ahead in a WC position earlier. There's a lot to look forward to for 2023... there's also a lot of work to do this off season.   
    • I feel like there's a default assumption that he's not a great blocker because most great pass catching TEs not named Kittle aren't.  But I've been looking out for him on running plays and this man is straight mauling people in run blocking.  He's easily Boyle's equal as a blocker even when Boyle is healthy.  But he's almost never playing tight end.   With the way he's pretty much permanently our slot receiver, having him as one of the main blockers on WR screens should be terrifying for DBs that have to shed this guy while tackling the receiver.  We put Ricard out wide a lot too, imagine Ricard and Andrews blocking for a WR screen to Bateman or Duvernay in trips.
    • Good post.  For me it doesn’t sting very much.   The team came a very long way this year.   But they were never more than a team with a puncher’s chance at the playoffs.   I’d still like to see them finish by playing a little better than they have for the last couple of weeks, to leave a good taste in our mouths after a fun season. 
    • I would want at least 3 years left for any pitcher we get in a trade.  I still think one of the young Astros starters makes the most sense.  The Astros were interested in Mullins before to upgrade their center fielder.   Elias knows that system so I like that as advantage.  Garcia, Valdez, Javier and Urquidy would be better fits because of at least 1 more year of control.  Javier would be my first choice because he has more strikeout stuff compared to other 3.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...