Jump to content

8/12/11 - Detroit @ Baltimore


nevadaO

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply
.

OK ........... I think that the pitch that was so far out of the strike zone that almost hit Jhonny Peralta, but wound up being a strike anyway because it hit his bat ............ will wind up being the turning point in this game. Instead of a 2-0 count with the bases loaded, one out, and a run already in, it was a 1-1 count. And then he proceeded to hit into a double play on the very next pitch. IT COULD BE tonight's turning point !!! :)

:eektf: :eektf: :eektf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

OK ........... I think that the pitch that was so far out of the strike zone that almost hit Jhonny Peralta, but wound up being a strike anyway because it hit his bat ............ will wind up being the turning point in this game. Instead of a 2-0 count with the bases loaded, one out, and a run already in, it was a 1-1 count. And then he proceeded to hit into a double play on the very next pitch. IT COULD BE tonight's turning point !!! :)

Were you there when Alfredo Simon got out of the first inning with only one earned run, by nearly beaning John E. Peralta? :laughlol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

Technically, we haven't trailed in this game. After one-half inning, the score was "Tigers 1, Orioles coming to bat." One full inning must be complete for there to officially be a deficit. That's the reason why they use the phrase "coming to bat" when they announce the score in between the top and the bottom of the first inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were you there when Alfredo Simon got out of the first inning with only one earned run, by nearly beaning John E. Peralta? :laughlol:

The other day, when we were getting blown out early 4-0, Juan Pierre got thrown out trying to stretch a double into a triple. I said that that could prove to be the turning point of the game. And what do you know ??? Zach Britton settled down, we chipped away at the lead, and then went ahead 5-4 in the sixth inning when J.J. Hardy hit a three-run home run. :eek: ......... only to have the bullpen blow the game in the 7th inning. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

Technically, we haven't trailed in this game. After one-half inning, the score was "Tigers 1, Orioles coming to bat." One full inning must be complete for there to officially be a deficit. That's the reason why they use the phrase "coming to bat" when they announce the score in between the top and the bottom of the first inning.

That's not accurate. Of course the Orioles trailed in this game.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not accurate. Of course the Orioles trailed in this game.

That is accurate. And that is why the announcer uses the phrase "coming to bat" in between the half innings of the first. Otherwise they would say "Tigers 1, Orioles, 0." And they never use that phrase after that from the second inning on. Only in between the top and the bottom of the first, when one of the teams has not yet come to bat at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is accurate. And that is why the announcer uses the phrase "coming to bat" in between the half innings of the first. Otherwise they would say "Tigers 1, Orioles, 0." And they never use that phrase after that from the second inning on. Only in between the top and the bottom of the first, when one of the teams has not yet come to bat at all.
It doesn't mean they were never trailing. That doesn't make sense.

Let's say the Tigers scored 5 runs in the top of the 1st, and the Orioles scored 6 runs in the bottom of the 1st. Wouldn't you say that the Orioles came back from a 5-0 deficit? That it was a comeback victory? I certainly would, and it would be listed in the statistics as a come-from-behind victory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...