Jump to content

What was Matusz' velocity / stuff like today?


glenn__davis

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

He hit 92. He sat around 89-90 for most of the game. I can deal with him being around 89-90. The potential to be effective is there, but like Palmer said he has to be perfect. There are some guys in this league who can throw a fastball or breaking ball right down the middle of the plate and get away with it because they are so nasty. Matusz is definitely not one of them. Still, he does seem to be regaining some of his stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say it's both. He located poorly, but his stuff is poor enough that big league hitters just crushed it. I feel like it's mostly a stuff issue. Every starter makes dozens of location mistakes a game. His just get hammered.
You are wrong.

With better command and location, Bmat can be excellent, as he has proved.

He doesn't have blow you away stuff but he can change speeds well and if he has command of all of his pitches, he can be a very good #2 starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are wrong.

With better command and location, Bmat can be excellent, as he has proved.

He doesn't have blow you away stuff but he can change speeds well and if he has command of all of his pitches, he can be a very good #2 starter.

Yeah if he had Glavine Like control. What lefty starter pitches like a #2 throwing 89 consistently? I bet there is no more than 1-2, if that. Matusz doesn't have any worse control than Clayton Kershaw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah if he had Glavine Like control. What lefty starter pitches like a #2 throwing 89 consistently? I bet there is no more than 1-2, if that. Matusz doesn't have any worse control than Clayton Kershaw.
Matusz...last year.

When you start citing velocity and act as if it is more important than command and location, it tells me that you know very little about pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matusz...last year.

His ERA+ was 97 last year. No matter how you slice or dice it. That's what it was. So he struggled in the beginning of the year. You can't take that away. He has never put in a full season of an ERA+ of 120. That's a #2 starter quality. He isn't even close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you start citing velocity and act as if it is more important than command and location, it tells me that you know very little about pitching.

You are underestimating stuff. Clayton Kershaw, arguably the best pitcher in the NL so far this season establishes his fastball belt high in the middle of the plate and is a pure ace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are underestimating stuff. Clayton Kershaw, arguably the best pitcher in the NL so far this season establishes his fastball belt high in the middle of the plate and is a pure ace.
And of that was all he had, he would be Brad Pennington.

I am not underestimating stuff but it is 5th on the totem pole behind command, control, location and movement. If you want to put locate and command in the same category, that's fine.

Either way, other things are more important.

And my point was that BMat proved that you can throw in the 89 area and be a very good starter. No, he didn't show it through a full season..yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And of that was all he had, he would be Brad Pennington.

I am not underestimating stuff but it is 5th on the totem pole behind command, control, location and movement. If you want to put locate and command in the same category, that's fine.

Either way, other things are more important.

And my point was that BMat proved that you can throw in the 89 area and be a very good starter. No, he didn't show it through a full season..yet.

I think (or at least hope) that everyone knows that you don't have to be a flamethrower to be effective; Matusz didn't need to prove that it was possible. However, the main point is that we want Matusz to show that he can be effective without being a flamethrower for an entire year. I'm optimistic it can be done, but it has yet to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Why is everyone so high on this guy anyway? His K rate is still good but it’s been on the decline for the last few years. Walk rate is high, HR is ok but not great.    His ERA was sub 2 in 2023 but he had a 219 BABiP(easily the best of his career), his xFIp was 4.5, his FIP was just under 4 and his xERA was 3.35.  This was his first sub 3 ERA season since 2019.    He’s going to get way overpaid because of a sub 2 ERA this year when in reality, he’s probably a 3.5ish ERA pitcher with some declining stats, although his statcast numbers are pretty solid.
    • They COULD do both.  I wouldn't want to sign Hader to anything more than 4 years.   Gunnar and Holliday could be under contract at relatively low salaries for that time.   
    • Oh, they’ll select someone.  I just don’t think they’ll keep him.  
    • I totally get this, happens to all of us.  Though I don't voice my appreciation enough I love this site for all of the information at our disposal.  Thank you for your expert coverage and creating a community for Oriole fans around the world!  
    • If those signed those 2 guys to a contract today, it would have absolutely zero impact on the payroll this year, next year or 5 years from now.    Those players are already signed for the next several years. They aren’t going anywhere. All the long term extension does is keep them under contract an extra 1-2 years. Thats it.  
    • I don't either.   But I expect Ortiz and Cowser to help the Os this year,  and I don't think Cease is a sure enough of an upgrade to trade them both for him.   In the right deal I'd certainly let them both go as they certainly aren't untouchable.  But I think 2 of our top 6 prospects is too steep a price for Cease.
    • I loved what Wells did in the first half last year.  I loved what he did in the first half of 2022.  I loved what he did in the first half of 2021.  But after three years, here are his career splits: 1st half: 231.2 IP, 3.42 ERA 2nd half: 47.2 IP, 6.61 ERA No matter what role he’s been in, he’s been excellent in the first half and absolutely fallen off a cliff after the all star break, three years in a row.   I’d love to see him prove that he can get through a whole year and remain effective.   But how do you plan for it?  What contingency plan to you have if the same pattern holds for a fourth year in a row?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...